Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Biol ; 33(3): 517-532.e5, 2023 02 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640763

ABSTRACT

The development of neuronal connectivity requires stabilization of dynamic axonal branches at sites of synapse formation. Models that explain how axonal branching is coupled to synaptogenesis postulate molecular regulators acting in a spatiotemporally restricted fashion to ensure branching toward future synaptic partners while also stabilizing the emerging synaptic contacts between such partners. We investigated this question using neuronal circuit development in the Drosophila brain as a model system. We report that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activity is required in presynaptic axonal branches during two distinct temporal intervals to regulate circuit wiring in the developing Drosophila visual system. EGFR is required early to regulate primary axonal branching. EGFR activity is then independently required at a later stage to prevent degradation of the synaptic active zone protein Bruchpilot (Brp). Inactivation of EGFR results in a local increase of autophagy in presynaptic branches and the translocation of active zone proteins into autophagic vesicles. The protection of synaptic material during this later interval of wiring ensures the stabilization of terminal branches, circuit connectivity, and appropriate visual behavior. Phenotypes of EGFR inactivation can be rescued by increasing Brp levels or downregulating autophagy. In summary, we identify a temporally restricted molecular mechanism required for coupling axonal branching and synaptic stabilization that contributes to the emergence of neuronal wiring specificity.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Axons/physiology , Drosophila/genetics , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Autophagy , Synapses/physiology , Receptors, Invertebrate Peptide/metabolism
2.
Cell Rep ; 37(12): 110145, 2021 12 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34936868

ABSTRACT

Variability of synapse numbers and partners despite identical genes reveals the limits of genetic determinism. Here, we use developmental temperature as a non-genetic perturbation to study variability of brain wiring and behavior in Drosophila. Unexpectedly, slower development at lower temperatures increases axo-dendritic branching, synapse numbers, and non-canonical synaptic partnerships of various neurons, while maintaining robust ratios of canonical synapses. Using R7 photoreceptors as a model, we show that changing the relative availability of synaptic partners using a DIPγ mutant that ablates R7's preferred partner leads to temperature-dependent recruitment of non-canonical partners to reach normal synapse numbers. Hence, R7 synaptic specificity is not absolute but based on the relative availability of postsynaptic partners and presynaptic control of synapse numbers. Behaviorally, movement precision is temperature robust, while movement activity is optimized for the developmentally encountered temperature. These findings suggest genetically encoded relative and scalable synapse formation to develop functional, but not identical, brains and behaviors.


Subject(s)
Brain/growth & development , Brain/metabolism , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila/metabolism , Neurons/metabolism , Synapses/metabolism , Temperature , Adaptation, Physiological , Animals , Axons/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Neurogenesis , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/metabolism
3.
Nat Commun ; 11(1): 1325, 2020 03 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32165611

ABSTRACT

Brain wiring is remarkably precise, yet most neurons readily form synapses with incorrect partners when given the opportunity. Dynamic axon-dendritic positioning can restrict synaptogenic encounters, but the spatiotemporal interaction kinetics and their regulation remain essentially unknown inside developing brains. Here we show that the kinetics of axonal filopodia restrict synapse formation and partner choice for neurons that are not otherwise prevented from making incorrect synapses. Using 4D imaging in developing Drosophila brains, we show that filopodial kinetics are regulated by autophagy, a prevalent degradation mechanism whose role in brain development remains poorly understood. With surprising specificity, autophagosomes form in synaptogenic filopodia, followed by filopodial collapse. Altered autophagic degradation of synaptic building material quantitatively regulates synapse formation as shown by computational modeling and genetic experiments. Increased filopodial stability enables incorrect synaptic partnerships. Hence, filopodial autophagy restricts inappropriate partner choice through a process of kinetic exclusion that critically contributes to wiring specificity.


Subject(s)
Autophagy , Brain/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Pseudopodia/physiology , Synapses/physiology , Animals , Attention , Axons/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Kinetics , Mosaicism , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/metabolism , Proteolysis , Synaptic Transmission/physiology
4.
Science ; 367(6482): 1112-1119, 2020 03 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139539

ABSTRACT

The genome versus experience dichotomy has dominated understanding of behavioral individuality. By contrast, the role of nonheritable noise during brain development in behavioral variation is understudied. Using Drosophila melanogaster, we demonstrate a link between stochastic variation in brain wiring and behavioral individuality. A visual system circuit called the dorsal cluster neurons (DCN) shows nonheritable, interindividual variation in right/left wiring asymmetry and controls object orientation in freely walking flies. We show that DCN wiring asymmetry instructs an individual's object responses: The greater the asymmetry, the better the individual orients toward a visual object. Silencing DCNs abolishes correlations between anatomy and behavior, whereas inducing DCN asymmetry suffices to improve object responses.


Subject(s)
Brain/growth & development , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Individuality , Neurogenesis , Visual Fields/physiology , Visual Pathways/growth & development , Animals , Brain/anatomy & histology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Genetic Variation , Orientation/physiology , Visual Pathways/anatomy & histology
5.
PLoS One ; 10(6): e0128490, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26053791

ABSTRACT

Most animal tissues and organ systems are comprised of highly ordered arrays of varying cell types. The development of external sensory organs requires complex cell-cell communication in order to give each cell a specific identity and to ensure a regular distributed pattern of the sensory bristles. This involves both long and short range signaling mediated by either diffusible or cell anchored factors. In a variety of processes the heterophilic Irre Cell Recognition Module, consisting of the Neph-like proteins: Roughest, Kin of irre and of the Nephrin-like proteins: Sticks and Stones, Hibris, plays key roles in the recognition events of different cell types throughout development. In the present study these proteins are apically expressed in the adhesive belt of epithelial cells participating in sense organ development in a partially exclusive and asymmetric manner. Using mutant analysis the GAL4/UAS system, RNAi and gain of function we found an involvement of all four Irre Cell Recognition Module-proteins in the development of a highly structured array of sensory organs in the wing disc. The proteins secure the regular spacing of sensory organs showing partial redundancy and may function in early lateral inhibition events as well as in cell sorting processes. Comparisons with other systems suggest that the Irre Cell Recognition module is a key organizer of highly repetitive structures.


Subject(s)
Cell Adhesion Molecules/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Sensation , Sensilla/metabolism , Wings, Animal/metabolism , Animals , Cell Shape , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Models, Biological , Protein Binding , Protein Transport , Pseudopodia/metabolism
6.
J Neurogenet ; 23(1-2): 48-67, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19132596

ABSTRACT

One of the most challenging problems in developmental neurosciences is to understand the establishment and maintenance of specific membrane contacts between axonal, dendritic, and glial processes in the neuropils, which eventually secure neuronal connectivity. However, underlying cell recognition events are pivotal in other tissues as well. This brief review focuses on the pleiotropic functions of a small, evolutionarily conserved group of proteins of the immunoglobulin superfamily involved in cell recognition. In Drosophila, this protein family comprises Irregular chiasm C/Roughest (IrreC/Rst), Kin of irre (Kirre), and their interacting protein partners, Sticks and stones (SNS) and Hibris (Hbs). For simplicity, we propose to name this ensemble of proteins the irre cell recognition module (IRM) after the first identified member of this family. Here, we summarize evidence that the IRM proteins function together in various cellular interactions, including myoblast fusion, cell sorting, axonal pathfinding, and target recognition in the optic neuropils of Drosophila. Understanding IRM protein function will help to unravel the epigenetic rules by which the intricate neurite networks in sensory neuropils are formed.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila/cytology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal , Cell Fusion , Drosophila/embryology , Eye/embryology , Eye Proteins , Myoblasts, Skeletal/cytology , Neurons/cytology , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Species Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...