Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Continuing/standards , Family Practice/education , Rheumatology/education , Communication , Curriculum , Ethics, Clinical , Family Practice/standards , Humans , Physician's Role , Physician-Patient Relations , Rheumatology/ethics , Rheumatology/standards , State Medicine/standardsABSTRACT
A targeted screen of babies at risk of having a sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using the auditory brainstem response has been in place since 1987 in Bradford and Airedale. The aims of this paper were to ascertain what proportion of a 4-year cohort of children with SNHL should have been identified by the programme; was identified by the programme; and the reasons for failing when children were missed. The cohort of 49 children had moderate to profound SNHL (> 50 dB) and were born between 1 April 1991 and 31 March 1995. Although 92% had at risk factors (higher than in other series), 80% was the maximum that could have been prospectively detected by the programme and only 37% were actually diagnosed as a result of the screening programme. Apart from a generalised under-recruitment, children with risk factors arising because of in utero, perinatal and postnatal events (as opposed to family history, craniofacial abnormalities and syndromes) tended to be missed (P < 0.01). The overall yield of the screening programme was 0.5/1000/year. While the yield of a universal neonatal screening programme based on otoacoustic emissions should be double this, a targeted infant distraction test later in infancy will be an essential backup. Improved liaison with paediatricians in particular as well as simplification of the referral criteria should improve targeting children at risk.
