[The role of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of endometrial hyperplasia]. / Ruolo dell'isteroscopia nella diagnosi e nel controllo dell'iperplasia endometriale.

BACKGROUND: Preneoplastic lesions of endometrium such as endometrial hyperplasia (simple and complex with or without cytological atypias) represent an important cause of abnormal uterine bleeding. Among diagnostic techniques, hysteroscopy presents several advantages: it is an out-patient procedure, minimally invasive, repeatable, of rapid execution and with low cost. The hysteroscopic pattern of endometrial hyperplasia appears with an over-development of the endometrial mucosa with increased glandular openings, increased vascularization, cystic dilatations, polypoid aspects. METHODS: Since October 1984 to January 1995 at the Gynecologic Endoscopic Service of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the University of Bologna, 13,438 hysteroscopies were performed: 291 (2.16%) in patients submitted to hysteroscopy for previous diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. The first diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia was made in 125 (42.3%) patients through hysteroscopic biopsy, while for 166 patients (57.04%) the first diagnosis was made by endometrial curettage of VABRA. RESULTS: The results showed that the endometrial hyperplasia is typical in perimenopausal age and this finding is more frequently symptomatic. The histological diagnosis after hysteroscopy was: simple hyperplasia in 106 patients (84.8%), complex in 12 patients (9.6%) and atypical in 6 patients (4.8%). One case of simplex hyperplasia was associated with endometrial cancer (0.8%). The comparison between histological diagnosis and hysteroscopic diagnosis showed that agreement is reached in 113 cases (90.4%). However, it is to note that diagnostic agreement of complex hyperplasia cases was about 100%, but in 22 cases the hysteroscopic diagnosis was simplex hyperplasia rather than complex or atypical. The errors of hysteroscopy were observed in 10 cases (8%). CONCLUSIONS: The hysteroscopic diagnosis should not replace histological diagnosis, mostly in hysteroscopies performed after progestagen therapy, because the changes induced by drugs make more difficult the interpretation of hysteroscopy. However, hysteroscopy is complementary to histological analysis since permits a global evaluation of endometrial mucosa, directs biopsy on dishomogeneous areas and represents the only means to make diagnosis when biopsy is not practicable.

[Outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: 14,000 cases]. / Isteroscopia diagnostica ambulatoriale: 14.000 casi.

Hysteroscopy is a technique which plays a fundamental diagnostic role in gynecological practice. The possibility of obtaining a direct intracavitary view and performing specific biopsies give it a greater level of diagnostic accuracy than intrauterine curettage. The authors' personal experience of 13,923 case enables the correct method of performing this procedure to be codified in order to avoid the inherent risks and complications. The main indication is abnormal uterine bleeding which is the most frequently observed pathology in gynecological practice. In cases of metrorrhagia in women of child-bearing age benign organic pathology accounts for 45% of patients and malignant pathology 0.3%. Post-menopausal patients reveal an increase in the incidence of organic pathology in general and neoplastic pathologies in particular (8.1%). Complications linked to this type of technique are extremely rare and in overall terms affect 1% of cases. The analysis of results shows that hysteroscopy today represents an extremely reliable and repeatable outpatient procedure. However, in spite of these advantages, including savings in health costs, it is not widely used at a capillary level given that if performed by persons who are not expert it may become traumatic and unreliable. The correct execution of hysteroscopy in fact calls for dexterity acquired over time which is not conditioned by the learning of previous techniques and requires an adequate period of training.

Transvaginal sonography vs. hysteroscopy in the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography vs. hysteroscopy in the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma, in order to establish the most appropriate surgical therapy. Transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy were used preoperatively in 67 women with histologically proven endometrial carcinoma. Deep myometrial invasion (> 50%) was present at postoperative pathology in 26/67 (39%) women and spread to the cervix occurred in 11/67 (16%) women. Transvaginal sonographic examination was initially directed at assessing myometrial invasion, which was correctly predicted in 52/67 (78%) women. Transvaginal sonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 88% (23/26) and a specificity of 71% (29/41) for deep invasion, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 66% (23/35) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91% (29/32). The accuracy of transvaginal sonography in detecting cervical involvement was 82% (55/67), and that of hysteroscopy was 72% (48/67): transvaginal sonography was slightly less sensitive (54% vs. 64%), but more specific (87% vs. 73%) than hysteroscopy. When cervical invasion was present, the PPVs of transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy were 46% (6/13) and 32% (7/22), respectively, while the NPV was 91% for both techniques (49/54; 41/45). Our data show that the accuracy of transvaginal sonography was comparable with that of hysteroscopy in detecting cervical involvement. Therefore, in the majority of cases, when both techniques showed that disease was limited, the appropriately limited type of surgery would be performed. Conversely, detection of a myometrial invasion of > 50% or an extension to the cervix would lead to an unnecessarily extensive operation if this was the sole criterion used for making the decision.