Gating and tracking, 4D in thoracic tumours.

The limited ability to control for a tumour's location compromises the accuracy with which radiation can be delivered to tumour-bearing tissue. The resultant requirement for larger treatment volumes to accommodate target uncertainty restricts the radiation dose because more surrounding normal tissue is exposed. With image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), these volumes can be optimized and tumouricidal doses may be delivered, achieving maximum tumour control with minimal complications. Moreover, with the ability of high precision dose delivery and real-time knowledge of the target volume location, IGRT has initiated the exploration of new indications in radiotherapy such as hypofractionated radiotherapy (or stereotactic body radiotherapy), deliberate inhomogeneous dose distributions coping with tumour heterogeneity (dose painting by numbers and biologically conformal radiation therapy), and adaptive radiotherapy. In short: "individualized radiotherapy". Tumour motion management, especially for thoracic tumours, is a particular problem in this context both for the delineation of tumours and organs at risk as well as during the actual treatment delivery. The latter will be covered in this paper with some examples based on the experience of the UZ Brussel. With the introduction of the NOVALIS system (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany) in 2000 and consecutive prototypes of the ExacTrac IGRT system, gradually a hypofractionation treatment protocol was introduced for the treatment of lung tumours and liver metastases evolving from motion-encompassing techniques towards respiratory-gated radiation therapy with audio-visual feedback and most recently dynamic tracking using the VERO system (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany). This evolution will be used to illustrate the recent developments in this particular field of research.

An overview of volumetric imaging technologies and their quality assurance for IGRT.

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) aims at frequent imaging in the treatment room during a course of radiotherapy, with decisions made on the basis of this information. The concept is not new, but recent developments and clinical implementations of IGRT drastically improved the quality of radiotherapy and broadened its possibilities as well as its indications. In general IGRT solutions can be classified in planar imaging, volumetric imaging using ionising radiation (kV- and MV- based CT) or non-radiographic techniques. This review will focus on volumetric imaging techniques applying ionising radiation with some comments on Quality Assurance (QA) specific for clinical implementation. By far the most important advantage of volumetric IGRT solutions is the ability to visualize soft tissue prior to treatment and defining the spatial relationship between target and organs at risk. A major challenge is imaging during treatment delivery. As some of these IGRT systems consist of peripheral equipment and others present fully integrated solutions, the QA requirements will differ considerably. It should be noted for instance that some systems correct for mechanical instabilities in the image reconstruction process whereas others aim at optimal mechanical stability, and the coincidence of imaging and treatment isocentre needs special attention. Some of the solutions that will be covered in detail are: (a) A dedicated CT-scanner inside the treatment room. (b) Peripheral systems mounted to the gantry of the treatment machine to acquire cone beam volumetric CT data (CBCT). Both kV-based solutions and MV-based solutions using EPIDs will be covered. (c) Integrated systems designed for both IGRT and treatment delivery. This overview will explain some of the technical features and clinical implementations of these technologies as well as providing an insight in the limitations and QA procedures required for each specific solution.

Optimal control of set-up margins and internal margins for intra- and extracranial radiotherapy using stereoscopic kilovoltage imaging.

In this paper the clinical introduction of stereoscopic kV-imaging in combination with a 6 degrees-of-freedom (6 DOF) robotics system and breathing synchronized irradiation will be discussed in view of optimally reducing interfractional as well as intrafractional geometric uncertainties in conformal radiation therapy. Extracranial cases represent approximately 70% of the patient population on the NOVALIS treatment machine (BrainLAB A.G., Germany) at the AZ-VUB, which is largely due to the efficiency of the real-time positioning features of the kV-imaging system. The prostate case will be used as an example of those target volumes showing considerable changes in position from day-to-day, yet with negligible motion during the actual course of the treatment. As such it will be used to illustrate the on-line target localization using kV-imaging and 6 DOF patient adjustment with and without implanted radio-opaque markers prior to treatment. Small lung lesion will be used to illustrate the system's potential to synchronize the irradiation with breathing in coping with intrafractional organ motion.

Remote control for a stand-alone freely movable treatment couch with limitation system.

One of our linear accelerators is equipped with a free-movable treatment couch. An additional projects was to develop a system that first protects the free-movable couch against collisions, secondly build a remote control for moving the couch from outside the treatment room and finally implement this remote control/limitation system in an automatic position algorithm using an electronic portal image. The latter has been the subject of an on-going departmental investigation on intra-fractional correction of set-up errors. A few years ago, we developed a limitation system to protect both the table and the accelerator against collisions. In this paper we describe the second part of this project, the remote control system.

Automatic on-line electronic portal image analysis with a wavelet-based edge detector.

A fully automatic method for on-line electronic portal image analysis is proposed. The method uses multiscale edge detection with wavelets for both the field outline and the anatomical structures. An algorithm to extract and combine the information from different scales has been developed. The edges from the portal image are aligned with the edges from the reference image using chamfer matching. The reference is the first portal image of each treatment. The matching is applied first to the field and subsequently to the anatomy. The setup deviations are quantified as the displacement of the anatomical structures relative to the radiation beam boundaries. The performance of the algorithm was investigated for portal images with different contrast and noise level. The automatic analysis was used first to detect simulated displacements. Then the automatic procedure was tested on anterior-posterior and lateral portal images of a pelvic phantom. In both sets of tests the differences between the measured and the actual shifts were used to quantify the performance. Finally we applied the automatic procedure to clinical images of pelvic and lung regions. The output of the procedure was compared with the results of a manual match performed by a trained operator. The errors for the phantom tests were small: average standard deviation of 0.39 mm and 0.26 degrees and absolute mean error of 0.31 mm and 0.2 degrees were obtained. In the clinical cases average standard deviations of 1.32 mm and 0.6 degrees were found. The average absolute mean errors were 1.09 mm and 0.39 degrees. Failures were registered in 2% of the phantom tests and in 3% of the clinical cases. The algorithm execution is approximately 5 s on a 168 MHz Sun Ultra 2 workstation. The automatic analysis tool is considered to be a very useful tool for on-line setup corrections.

A computerized remote table control for fast on-line patient repositioning: implementation and clinical feasibility.

A computerized remote control for a Siemens ZXT treatment couch was implemented and its characteristics were investigated to establish its feasibility for on-line setup corrections, using portal imaging. Communication with the table was obtained by connecting it via a serial line to a work station. The treatment couch enables "goto" commands in the three main directions and around the isocenter. The accuracy of the movements after giving such a command was checked and the time for each movement was recorded. First, the movements into a single direction were studied (range of -4 to +4 cm and -4 degrees to +4 degrees). Each command was repeated four times. Second, the table was moved into the three main directions simultaneously. For this experiment a clinically relevant three-dimensional (3-D) normal distribution of shifts was used [N = 200, standard deviation (SD) 5 mm in the three main directions]. This latter experiment was done twice: without and with rotations (a distribution with SD 1 degrees). During the first experiment, with shifts into one direction, no systematic deviations were found. The overall accuracy of the shifts was 0.6 mm (1 SD) in each direction and 0.04 degrees (1 SD) for the rotations. The time required for a translation ranged between 4 and 13 s and for the rotation between 8 and 20 s. The second experiment with the 3-D distribution of setup errors yielded an error in the 3-D vector length equal to 0.96 mm (1 SD), independent of rotations. Shifts were performed in less than 11 s for 95% of the cases without rotations. When rotations were also performed, 95% of the movements finished in less than 16 s. In conclusion, the table movements are accurate and enable on-line setup corrections in daily clinical practice.

[Conformal radiotherapy: tomotherapy]. / Radiothérapie conformationnelle: la tomothérapie.

Conformal radiation therapy allows the possibility of delivering high doses at the tumor volume whilst limiting the dose to the surrounding tissues and diminishing the secondary effects. With the example of the conformal radiation therapy used at the AZ VUB (3DCRT and tomotherapy), two treatment plans of a left ethmoid carcinoma will be evaluated and discussed in detail. The treatment of ethmoid cancer is technically difficult for both radiation therapy and surgery because of the anatomic constraints and patterns of local spread. A radiation therapy is scheduled to be delivered after surgical resection of the tumor. The treatment plan for the radiation therapy was calculated on a three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning system based on virtual simulation with a beam's eye view: George Sherouse's Gratis. An effort was made to make the plan as conformal and as homogeneous as possible to deliver a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions at the tumor bed with a maximum dose of 56 Gy to the right optic nerve and the chiasma. To establish the clinical utility and potential advantages of tomotherapy over 3DCRT for ethmoid carcinoma, the treatment of this patient was also planned with Peacock Plan. For both treatment plans the isodose distributions and cumulative dose volume histograms (CDVH) were computed. Superimposing the CDVHs yielded similar curves for the target and an obvious improvement for organs at risk such as the chiasma, brainstem and the left eye when applying tomotherapy. These results have also been reflected in the tumor control probabilities (equal for both plans) and the normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP), yielded significant reductions in NTCP for tomotherapy. The probability of uncomplicated tumor control was 52.7% for tomotherapy against 38.3% for 3DCRT.

Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The integration of a scanner for computed tomography (CT) and a treatment simulator (Sim-CT, Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK) has been studied in a clinical situation. Image quality, hounsfield units (HU) and linearity have been evaluated as well as the implications for treatment planning. The additional dose to the patient has also been highlighted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Image data is acquired using an array of solid state X-ray detectors attached externally to the simulator's image intensifier. Three different fields of view (FOV: 25.0 cm, 35.0 cm and 50.0 cm) with 0.2 cm, 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm slice thickness can be selected and the system allows for an aperture diameter of 92.0 cm at standard isocentric height. The CT performance has been characterized with several criteria: spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity, geometric accuracy, reliability of hounsfield units and the radiation output level. The spatial resolution gauge of the nuclear associates quality phantom (NAQP) as well as modulation transfer functions (MTF) have been applied to evaluate the spatial resolution. Contrast sensitivity and HU measurements have been performed by means of the NAQP and a HU conversion phantom that allows inserts with different electron densities. The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) of the CT-option has been monitored with a pencil shaped ionization chamber. Treatment planning and dose calculations for heterogeneity correction based on the Sim-CT images generated from an anthropomorphic phantom as well as from ten patients have been compared with similar treatment plans based on identical, yet diagnostic CT (DCT) images. RESULTS: The last row of holes that are resolved in the spatial resolution gauge of the NAQP are either 0.150 cm or 0.175 cm depending on the FOV and the applied reconstruction filter. These are consistent with the MTF curves showing cut-off frequencies ranging from 5.3 lp/cm to 7.1 lp/cm. Linear regression analysis of HU versus electron densities revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.99. Contrast, pixel size and geometric accuracy are within specifications. Computed tomography dose index values of 0.204 Gy/As and 0.069 Gy/As have been observed with dose measurements in the center of a 16 cm diameter and 32 cm diameter phantom, respectively for large FOV. Small FOV yields CTDI values of 0.925 Gy/As and 0.358 Gy/As which is a factor ten higher than the results obtained from a DCT under similar acquisition conditions. The phantom studies showed excellent agreement between dose distributions generated with the Sim-CT and DCT HU. The deviations between the calculated settings of monitor units as well as the maximum dose in three dimensions were less than 1% for the treatment plans based on either of these HU both for pelvic as well as thoracic simulations. The patient studies confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: The CT-option can be considered as an added value to the simulation process and the images acquired on the Sim-CT system are adequate for dose calculation with tissue heterogeneity correction. The good image quality, however, is compromised by the relative high dose values to the patient. The considerable load to the conventional X-ray tube currently limits the Sim-CT to seven image acquisitions per patient and therefore the system is limited in its capability to perform full three-dimensional reconstruction.

Assessment of the uncertainties in dose delivery of a commercial system for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was introduced in our department in 1992, and since then, more than 200 patients have been treated with this method. An in-house-developed algorithm for target localization and dose calculation has recently been replaced with a commercially available system. In this study, both systems have been compared, and positional accuracy, as well as dose calculation, have been verified experimentally. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The in-house-developed software for target localization and dose calculation is an extension to George Sherouse's GRATIS(R) software for radiotherapy treatment planning, and has been replaced by a commercial (BrainSCAN version 3.1; BrainLAB, Germany) treatment planning system (TPS) for SRS. The positional accuracy for the entire SRS procedure (from image acquisition to treatment) has been investigated by treatment of simulated targets in the form of 0.2-cm lead beads inserted into an anthropomorphic phantom. Both dose calculation algorithms have been verified against manual calculations (based on basic beam data and CT data from phantom and patients), and measurements with the anthropomorphic phantom applying ionization chamber, thermoluminescent detectors, and radiographic film. This analysis has been performed on a variety of experimental situations, starting with static beams and simple one-arc treatments, to more complex and clinical relevant applications. Finally, 11 patients have been evaluated with both TPS in parallel for comparison and continuity of clinical experience. RESULTS: Phantom studies evaluating the entire SRS procedure have shown that a target, localized by CT, can be irradiated with a positional accuracy of 0.08 cm in any direction with 95% confidence. Neglecting the influence of dose perturbation when the beam passes through bone tissue or air cavities, the calculated dose values obtained from both TPSs agreed within 1% (SD 1%) for phantom and patient studies. The application of a one-dimensional path length correction for tissue heterogeneity influences the treatment prescription 4% on average (SD 1%), which is in compliance with theoretical predictions. The phantom measurements confirmed the predicted dose at isocenter within uncertainty for the different treatment schedules in this study. CONCLUSION: The full SRS procedure applied to an anthropomorphic phantom has been used as a comprehensive method to assess the uncertainties involved in dose delivery and target positioning. The results obtained with both TPSs are in agreement with AAPM Report 54, TG 42 and clinical continuity is assured. However, the use of a one-dimensional path length correction will result in an increase of 4% in dose prescription, which is slightly more than that predicted in the literature.

Target localization and treatment verification for intensity modulated conformal radiation therapy of the head and neck region. The AZ-VUB experience. Akademisch Ziekenhuis-Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

PURPOSE: Based on a previous evaluation of a conventional, non-invasive fixation technique in combination with a commercially available system for conformal radiation therapy by means of intensity modulation of the treatment beam some modifications have been proposed with respect to target localization and treatment verification. This paper reports on an on-going study of which some preliminary results are presented and discussed with respect to reproducibility of the treatment set-up and verification of the dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A slice-by-slice arc-rotation approach was used to deliver a conformal dose to the target and patient fixation was performed by means of a thermoplastic cast. In a previous study a procedure for target localization and verification of patient positioning suitable for this particular treatment technique had been developed and verified dosimetrically with an anthropomorphic phantom: both absolute dose measurements (alanine and thermoluminescent detectors) and relative dose distribution measurements (film dosimetry) have been applied. Two issues needed special attention, being: a) increased accuracy in patient set-up and b) deviations between measured and predicted dose values to organs at risk (OAR) in extreme situations. In a 2nd phase, fiducial markers fixed to customized ear moulds and a bite block have been introduced for target localization and verification of patient set-up on a day-to-day basis. A dosimetric verification by means of TLD and an anthropomorphic phantom has been performed to investigate the possible influence of leakage dose. RESULTS: The dose verification with the anthropomorphic phantom yielded a ratio between measured and predicted dose values of 1.0 for typical cases. However, large deviations (i.e. measured/calculated = 2.9) have been observed in cases with extreme dose constraints to the OAR due to a leakage dose of approximately 0.5%. Dosimetric verification showed good agreement with the dose calculation once the limitations of the system (10% of the target dose to the OAR) had been taken into consideration. Day-to-day variations in patient set-up of 0.3 cm (translations) and 2.0 degrees (rotations) were considered acceptable for this particular patient population in an initial phase, whereas variations of less than 0.1 cm can be achieved with the introduction of ear moulds and daily monitoring in a second phase. Preliminary results show a reproducibility of 0.08 cm in positioning of the fiducial landmarks with respect to anatomical landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive fixation technique in combination with fiducial markers fixed to individualized ear moulds and a bite block proved to be acceptable for IMRT of the head and neck region and allow for daily monitoring of patient set-up. The latter becomes mandatory if an accuracy of 0.1 cm and 1.0 degree is required. A clinical trial has been initiated recently to generate substantial data on the accuracy of the presented procedure for treatment set-up. Dose measurements confirmed the predicted dose values to the target and OAR, however, a physical limitation is represented by the 0.5% leakage through the leaves in that dose constraints to the OAR should be limited to 10% of the target dose.

Use of a simulator with CT option in radiotherapy of macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a conventional simulation procedure in radiotherapy of age-related macular degeneration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computed tomographic (CT) extension attached to the treatment simulator was used to acquire CT images immediately after conventional simulation in 18 patients referred for treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Analysis was performed on 16 one-sided treatment cases for whom images were obtained. Error was estimated by the displacement between the observed treatment isocenter and the intended isocenter based on reconstructed eye geometry. RESULTS: Based on single slice measurements, the mean error amplitude was 2.3 mm (range 0.2-5.6). Based on three-dimensional eye globe reconstruction, the mean error amplitude was 2.8 mm (range 0.8-5.3). An incidental finding previously unreported was the lower image quality at the center of the simulator-CT image acquisition field. CONCLUSIONS: Small but significant errors from conventional simulation were noted. The integrated simulation-CT procedure may help correct the errors to improve the accuracy of simulation setup. The lower image quality at the center of image acquisition field requires adaptation of the simulation-CT procedure.

Microprocessor controlled limitation system for a stand-alone freely movable treatment couch.

Because of the capability of free movement in the treatment room, we recently introduced a Hercules treatment couch on one of our linear accelerators. One of the advantages of this couch is that it allows for a more flexible way of patient setup and that it can be moved entirely out of the way to enable treatment with a hospital bed. A disadvantage, however, is that the couch can hit a wall or a cover of the accelerator accidentally. A limitation system has been developed to protect both the table and the accelerator against such collisions.

Initial experience with intensity-modulated conformal radiation therapy for treatment of the head and neck region.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of a conventional, noninvasive fixation technique in combination with a commercially available system for conformal radiotherapy by intensity modulation of the treatment beam has been studied. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A slice-by-slice arc-rotation approach was used to deliver a conformal dose to the target and patient fixation was performed by means of thermoplastic casts. Eleven patients have been treated, of which 9 were for tumors of the head and neck region and 2 were for intracranial lesions. A procedure for target localization and verification of patient positioning suitable for this particular treatment technique has been developed based on the superposition of digitized portals with plots generated from the treatment-planning system. A dosimetric verification of the treatment procedure was performed with an anthropomorphic phantom: both absolute dose measurements (alanine and thermoluminescent detectors) and relative dose distribution measurements (film dosimetry) have been applied. The dose delivered outside the target has also been investigated. RESULTS: The dose verification with the anthropomorphic phantom yielded a ratio between measured and predicted dose values of 1.0 for different treatment schedules and the calculated dose distribution agreed with the measured dose distribution. Day-to-day variations in patient setup of 0.3 cm (translations) and 2.0 degrees (rotations) were considered acceptable for this particular patient population, whereas the verification protocol allowed detection of 0.1 cm translational errors and 1.0 rotational errors. CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive fixation technique in combination with an adapted verification protocol proved to be acceptable for conformal treatment of the head and neck region. Dose measurements, in turn, confirmed the predicted dose values to the target and organs at risk within uncertainty. Daily monitoring becomes mandatory if an accuracy superior to 0.1 cm and 1.0 degree is required for patient setup.