ABSTRACT
Regional recurrence of endometrial cancer is a challenging yet potentially curable group of patients without defined standard of care. Our aim is to determine optimal methods of salvage therapy for regionally recurrent endometrial cancer. Twenty-two cases of nodal, pelvic, or peritoneal cavity recurrences of endometrial cancer were identified from a single institution database. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of a second recurrence or death. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to estimate the probability of progression free survival and overall survival among patients in three cohorts: Multimodality therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] +/- vaginal brachytherapy), non-surgery (chemotherapy or EBRT, or both), and surgery cohort (surgery +/- chemotherapy OR EBRT). Thirteen recurrences (59%) were regional including the pelvic and paraaortic nodes, while nine recurrences (41%) were abdominal. For the entire cohort, the probability of progression free survival at 2â¯years was 51% (95% CI, 26% - 72%). The 2-year probability of progression free survival was 62% in the multimodality cohort, 40% in the non-surgery cohort, and 38% in the surgery cohort. The 2-year probability of overall survival was 69% (95% CI, 38% - 86%) across our population. At 40â¯months of follow up, the only living patients belonged to the multimodality cohort. We found no significant association of a definitive salvage regimen for recurrent endometrial cancer of the pelvis and peritoneal cavity. Aggressive use of multimodality therapy with surgery followed by tumor-directed radiotherapy and chemotherapy offers potentially curative therapy for these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy choice for women with FIGO stage III endometrial carcinoma (EC) is controversial. We investigate the comparative benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) alone, radiation therapy alone (RT) or in combination (chemotherapy and radiation therapy [CRT]) with respect to recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with pelvis-limited (PL) EC (stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional database of 270 surgically staged women with PLEC was analyzed. Univariate log-rank analyses and Cox regression multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to identify factors associated with RFS and OS. RESULTS: Median RFS and OS were 112 and 130 months, respectively, for the full cohort. Adjuvant treatment was CT in 21%, RT in 27%, and CRT in 47%. Age, year of treatment, grade, histology, and adjuvant treatment were significantly associated with RFS and OS on univariate analysis. PLEC patients receiving CT alone fared worse in terms of RFS (P=0.07 relative to RT and <0.01 relative to CRT). On MVA, CRT retained significantly improved RFS relative to CT (hazard ratio for recurrence 0.38, P<0.01). PLEC patients receiving RT or CRT had improved OS compared with CT, P<0.01 and 0.03, respectively. On MVA, both RT only and CRT retained association with improved OS relative to CT alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.43, P=0.02 and 0.40, P<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For surgically staged PL stage III EC, treatment regimens incorporating RT were associated with improved survival endpoints relative to CT alone. As such, RT should be considered an important component in the adjuvant management of stage III PLEC.
