Assessment of the Berlin Questionnaire for evaluation of hypoxemia risk in subjects undergoing deep sedation for screening gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are vulnerable to sedation-related complications during endoscopic procedures. A significant portion of subjects undergoing routine endoscopy is at high risk of OSA, but most are undiagnosed. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of high risk for OSA among Chinese subjects undergoing deep sedation for screening gastrointestinal endoscopy and to evaluate the hypoxemia risk of these examinees stratified by Berlin Questionnaire (BQ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in subjects undergoing deep sedation with monitored anesthesia care for combined esophagogastroduodenoscopy plus colonoscopy. Subjects who were Chinese were stratified into high- and low-risk groups for OSA by administration of BQ. Deep sedation was achieved via a propofol target-controlled infusion system. Hypoxemia was defined as pulse oximetry reading of less than 90%. The frequency of hypoxemia was compared between high- and low-risk groups for OSA. RESULTS: A total of 615 Chinese subjects were recruited during the study period, and 614 subjects were included for analysis. Two hundred eighteen (35.5%) subjected were classified to be at high risk of OSA, and 396 (64.5%) were stratified to be at low risk of OSA by BQ. Hypoxemia occurred in 83 (13.5%) subjects during endoscopy procedures. The risk of developing hypoxemia in the high-risk group was significantly higher when compared to that of the low-risk group subjects (24.8% vs 7.3%; relative risk, 3.37; 95% CI, 2.22-5.13). CONCLUSION: About one-third Chinese subjects undergoing deep sedation for screening endoscopy were at high risk of OSA. Subjects at high risk of OSA are associated with an increased risk of hypoxemia in comparison to the low-risk group when undergoing deep sedation for screening gastrointestinal endoscopy.

The questionable efficacy of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in combination with propofol sedation in gastroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Topical pharyngeal anesthesia as an adjunct to intravenous sedation to facilitate gastroscopy has been widely acknowledged; however, its efficacy has not been established when it is used in patients under deep sedation with propofol. AIMS: To demonstrate the limited value of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in patients under moderate to deep sedation with propofol. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients undergoing gastroscopy were prospectively randomized to receive 10 % lidocaine or distilled water topical spray as an adjunct to intravenous propofol via target-controlled infusion. Verbal and somatic responsiveness, presence of gag reflex and hiccup to esophageal intubation, and the overall ease of the procedure were evaluated by the anaesthetists and gastroenterologists. Hemodynamic parameters including peripheral oxygen saturation, systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), heart rate (HR), bispectral index, and SBP × HR were compared at 5 time points: on arrival, after 5 spontaneous breaths, when estimated brain concentration of propofol, Ce, reached 3.5 µg/ml, on esophageal intubation, and on awakening. RESULTS: No statistical difference was observed between the lidocaine and distilled water group in verbal or somatic responses, gag reflex or hiccups on esophageal intubation. Similarly, BIS, SBP, DBP, and HR showed no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in combination with target-controlled infusion with propofol in the performance of diagnostic gastroscopy might be eliminated without adversely affecting patient care or outcomes.

A randomized blinded study of the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women after major gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in women undergoing major gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with an expected surgical duration exceeding 1 hour and anticipated overnight hospitalization. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: This study was set at a university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred forty female patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I or II and scheduled for gynecologic inpatient laparoscopic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 mg granisetron (Group A, n=70), or saline solution (Group B, n=70) intravenously after induction of general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The endpoints were evaluated by the following parameters: the incidence of PONV, episodes of nausea, retching, vomiting, rescue antiemetics, and complete response. Patients were closely observed for 24 hours after administration of the study drug. The two groups were generally well balanced in terms of demographic variables. The surgical period was longer in the granisetron group compared with the saline solution group. The total incidence of PONV was 41/70 (59%) in patients who underwent inpatient gynecologic laparoscopic surgery when no prophylactic antiemetic was given. Administration of granisetron decreased the incidence of PONV (29/70 [41%] vs 41/70 [59%], p<.05), the incidence of vomiting (18/70 [26%] vs 31/70 [44%], p<.05), and the proportions of patients requiring rescue antiemetics (14/70 [20%] vs 47/70 [67%], p<.01), but these results were not comparable to other studies. CONCLUSION: A long surgical period may have great impact on the PONV in women who undergo gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, which implies the need for skilled gynecologic laparoscopists.

Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been developed as an attractive alternative to continuous epidural infusion (CEI) for labor pain control. PCEA is still not popular for labor pain control in Taiwan and disparities may exist between different ethnic and cultural groups toward the attitude of labor pain control. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were any differences between PCEA and CEI in the maintenance of epidural analgesia for Taiwanese parturients undergoing spontaneous delivery. METHODS: We collected data of 179 parturient requests for epidural labor analgesia. They were allocated into two groups with PCEA (n = 81) or CEI (n = 98) for maintenance with the same solution of 0.08% ropivacaine and 2 microg/mL fentanyl mixture. The demographic characteristics, epidural maintenance methods, dosage requirements, obstetrical outcomes, intervention of inadequate analgesia or side effects, and the quality of labor analgesia of parturient were also analyzed. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic characteristics, duration of 1st and 2nd stages, delivery methods, fetal Apgar scores, local anesthetics usage, and analgesic qualities between the PCEA and CEI groups. There were also more requirements for intervention by the anesthesiologist due to inadequate analgesia in the CEI group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provided further evidence that PCEA is a highly effective method of the control of labor pain, which was highly accepted by women in labor. In a busy obstetric unit, this could potentially improve parturient satisfaction and reduce the workloads of clinicians and nurses.

Intubation conditions with low dose rocuronium under sevoflurane induction for children.

BACKGROUND: During short surgical procedures and when there is a need to avoid the use of anticholinesterase at the end of surgery, the use of a smaller intubation dose of neuromuscular blocking drug is preferred. The aim of this study was to evaluate tracheal intubation conditions using smaller doses of rocuronium for children under sevoflurane induction. METHODS: Eighty American Society of Anesthesiologists classification physical status I or II children were enrolled. After mask induction with sevoflurane with nitrous oxide for 3 minutes, 0.3 mg/kg of rocuronium was given. Intubation was performed 60 or 90 seconds thereafter. Study group A included children aged 1 to 3 years and 90 seconds between rocuronium injection and intubation. Group B included children aged 1 to 3 years who had 60 seconds between rocuronium injection and intubation. Group C included children aged 4 to 6 years who had 90 seconds between rocuronium injection and intubation. Group D included children aged 4 to 6 years who had 60 seconds between rocuronium injection and intubation. Intubation conditions were judged based on the scoring of ease of jaw opening and laryngoscopy, position of the vocal cords, and degree of straining after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: All 80 children underwent successful tracheal intubation without laryngospasm or any complications. Intubation conditions were judged as optimal in all children in group A, 95% in group B, 80% in group C, and 65% in group D. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 0.3 mg/kg of rocuronium was sufficient for tracheal intubation for children 1 to 6 years old under sevoflurane induction. To guarantee optimal intubation conditions for elder children, allow 90 seconds waiting time after rocuronium administration was recommended.

Caudal epidural block for minor gynecologic procedures in outpatient surgery.

BACKGROUND: Caudal epidural block (CEB) has become increasingly important for pediatric analgesia in recent years. However, data regarding CEB in adult ambulatory surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to verify whether CEB could be applied as a simple, safe and economic method of anesthesia for adult patients undergoing minor gynecologic procedures (MGP). METHODS: One hundred and seventy-two female patients were enrolled in this study. Each patient received a 20-mL bolus of 1.5% lidocaine caudal epidural injection. The efficacy of CEB was evaluated. Types and duration of surgery, success rate, sensory level of analgesia, caudal epidural depth, complications and duration in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were also under investigation. RESULTS: No side effects occurred and only few hemodynamic changes were noted in the study. All patients experienced excellent surgical anesthesia except seven patients, who required rescue supplement opioids (4.1% of failure rate). The success rate of CEB was 95.9% (165/172). Duration of anesthesia and surgery were 46.66 +/- 11.76 min and 23.08 +/- 9.54 min, respectively. The highest sensory dermatome level reached below T10. The average epidural depth was 3.06 +/- 0.23 cm. No postoperative anti-emetic was given in the study. Only three patients required postoperative narcotics. Four patients had spontaneous voiding before discharge. The average PACU stay was 74.30 +/- 10.80 min. CONCLUSION: Single-dose CEB with 1.5% lidocaine 20-mL was an easy and simple technique. It provided satisfactory anesthesia for MGP and did not prolong patients' discharge time. CEB may be another choice of anesthetic technique in such cases of clinical practice.