Treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease with anti-CD147 monoclonal antibody ABX-CBL.

ABX-CBL, an immunoglobulin M murine monoclonal antibody, recognizes CD147 and initiates cell killing through complement-mediated lysis. In a dose-finding trial, 27 patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) received ABX-CBL at 0.01 (presumed no effect dose), 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mg/kg per day, and an additional 32 patients were given ABX-CBL at 0.2 or 0.15 mg/kg per day. All patients had undergone allogeneic transplantation for malignant or nonmalignant disorders and received GVHD prophylaxis, generally with methotrexate- and cyclosporine-containing regimens. None responded to methylprednisolone, given for a minimum of 3 days. ABX-CBL was started 20 to 236 (median, 47) days after transplantation; it was given for 7 consecutive days and was followed by 2 infusions per week for 2 more weeks. Among 51 patients evaluable for efficacy, 26 (51%) responded, including 13 with complete responses (CR) and 13 with partial responses (PR). CR lasting 14 days or longer or PR lasting 7 days or longer occurred in 21 (41%; 8 CR, 13 PR) patients, including 19 of 43 (44%) patients who received 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg ABX-CBL and 2 of 8 (25%) patients given 0.01 mg/kg per day. Myalgias at doses 0.2 mg/kg or greater were dose limiting and resolved without sequelae. Causes of death included organ failure, progressive GVHD, and infection. No death was attributed to ABX-CBL. At 6 months after the initiation of ABX-CBL therapy, 26 (44%) patients were surviving. These results are encouraging. Further studies on the use of ABX-CBL in the management of GVHD are warranted.

Standardizing assessment of adverse effects in rheumatology clinical trials. Status of OMERACT Toxicity Working Group March 2000: towards a common understanding of comparative toxicity/safety profiles for antirheumatic therapies.

This paper describes the background and current status of an OMERACT facilitated effort to improve the consistency of adverse event reporting in rheumatology clinical trials. The overall goal is the development of an adverse event assessment tool that would provide a basis for use of common terminology and improve the consistency of reporting severity of side effects within rheumatology clinical trials and during postmarketing surveillance. The resulting Rheumatology Common Toxicity Criteria Index encompassed the following organ systems: allergic/immunologic, cardiac, ENT, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric, ophthalmologic, pulmonary and skin/integument. Before this tool is widely accepted, its validity, consistency, and feasibility need to be assessed in clinical trials.

A proposal for developing a large patient population cohort for longterm safety monitoring in rheumatoid arthritis. OMERACT Drug Safety Working Party.

This paper proposes the creation of an objectively acquired reference database to more accurately characterize the incidence and longterm risk of relatively infrequent, but serious, adverse events. Such a database would be maintained longitudinally to provide for ongoing comparison with new rheumatologic drug safety databases collecting the occurrences and treatments of rare events. We propose the establishment of product-specific registries to prospectively follow a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who receive newly approved therapies. In addition, a database is required of a much larger cohort of RA patients treated with multiple second line agents of sufficient size to enable case-controlled determinations of the relative incidence of rare but serious events in the treated (registry) versus the larger disease population. The number of patients necessary for agent-specific registries and a larger patient population adequate to supply a matched case-control cohort will depend upon estimates of the detectability of an increased incidence over background. We suggest a system to carry out this proposal that will involve an umbrella organization, responsible for establishment of this large patient cohort, envisioned to be drawn from around the world.

Reduced nerve growth factor in Rett syndrome postmortem brain tissue.

To determine whether reduced nerve growth factor (NGF) and/or its high affinity receptor, trkA, play a role in the pathophysiology of Rett syndrome (RS), we used immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded human autopsy brain tissue, to quantify NGF and trkA levels within the frontal cortex of 9 RS females and 10 female controls of similar age. The results showed a significant reduction of NGF expression in RS patients (p < 0.001). Specifically, all RS brains exhibited NGF levels at or below the minimum level observed in controls. In 3 RS brains there was no NGF detected. TrkA expression was also reduced in the RS group (p = 0.035). Interestingly, the expression of NGF in the RS group was significantly related to the presence of cortical astrogliosis (r = 0.91) as indicated by immunostaining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). This suggests that while the signals for NGF production during injury remain intact, the critical developmental signals required for early NGF production are impaired.

Clinical and immunologic effects of a PRIMATIZED anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody in active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a phase I, single dose, dose escalating trial.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this single infusion, dose escalation study was to evaluate the safety of the PRIMATIZED anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (Mab), IDEC-CE9.1, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Twenty-five patients received single infusions of IDEC-CE9.1 in dose escalation form (0.03 to 4 mg/kg). Cohorts consisted of 3 patients each with seropositive RA. Following treatment, patients were monitored for 2 weeks before initiation of treatment of the next cohort. Peripheral blood samples were taken during and after treatment to measure immune function. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in vitro proliferative responses to antigens and recall antigens were assessed pre and post-treatment. Cell surface markers CD3, CD4 (OKT4 and Leu 3a), CD8, CD20, CD25, CD45Ro, CD45Ra and DR were analyzed, and proliferation to mitogens and recall antigens was measured. RESULTS: No infusion related adverse events were noted and other drug related adverse events were mild. Reduction in peripheral CD4 T cell number was brief (3 to 7 days) and not associated with infection. CD4 cell surface antigen downmodulation was observed postinfusion. Suppression of CD25 expression was associated with a positive clinical response. In vitro proliferative responses to mitogens and antigen were inhibited for up to one month with no association to positive clinical response. CONCLUSION: IDEC-CE9.1 appears to have a benign safety profile and may modulate immune function rather than deplete CD4+ T cells.

Comparative effects of nabumetone, sulindac, and ibuprofen on renal function.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been associated with hemodynamically mediated acute renal failure. There appear to be differences among NSAID in producing this effect. We compare renal effects of ibuprofen, sulindac, and nabumetone. METHODS: Seventeen women over age 56 receiving hydrochlorothiazide and fosinopril for hypertension who had osteoarthritis requiring NSAID received 3 different NSAID to evaluate potential varying renal effects. In an investigator blinded randomized study, patients received nabumetone, sulindac, or ibuprofen for 1 month with intervening 2 week control periods. After each period renal function was assessed by inulin and para-aminohippurate clearances and urinary prostaglandins were measured. RESULTS: No overall statistical differences among the NSAID were observed. However, there were clinically meaningful differences during ibuprofen therapy: 4 patients developed a clinically significant decrease in renal function; during sulindac therapy one of these also developed a clinically significant decrease in renal function. During nabumetone there were 0 episodes of clinically significant decrease in renal function. Using Gomez equations, glomerular hydrostatic pressure and afferent and efferent arteriolar resistances were estimated. None changed overall during any intervention. However, the 4 patients who developed decreased renal function while taking ibuprofen were analyzed separately. Glomerular hydrostatic pressure decreased 15%; afferent arteriolar resistance increased 85%. These changes were associated with marked decreases in vasodilatory prostaglandins compared to patients receiving ibuprofen who did not develop decreases in renal function. CONCLUSION: There are differences in effect on renal function among NSAID. These can be correlated with specific alterations in suppression of the cyclooxygenase system cascade and related to changes in the hemodynamic control of glomerular filtration.

Relationships between antibodies against human soluble complement receptor 1 (hsCR1) from various species.

The relationships between antibodies against human soluble complement receptor 1 (hsCR1) were studied in rodents, dogs, nonhuman primates, and humans. An antibody response occurred in all species except humans. The anti-hsCR1 antibodies from the various species were characterized to determine if they recognize similar epitopes on the hsCR1 molecule. Dog and monkey sera, positve for hsCR1 binding, were used as blocking antibodies against mouse anti-hsCR1 monoclonal antibodies as well as mouse and rat anti-hsCR1-positive sera. Human sera (blood group antisera: anti-Knops, anti-McCoy, anti-Knops/McCoy, anti-Swain-Langley) and serum from one burn patient (who became seropositive despite ever receiving treatment with hsCR1) were also used to test blocking of mouse, rat, dog, and monkey anti-hsCR1. Characterization of anti-hsCR1 antibodies from different species demonstrated that hsCR1 causes divergent antibody responses among animals. While mouse, rat, and dog antibodies cross inhibit binding by approximately 50%, monkey antibodies recognize primarily different epitopes of the hsCR1 molecule. Moreover, human antibodies binding hsCR1 are completely different from the animal antibodies, including monkey. This study indicates that although hsCR1 is immunogenic in animals, there is a difference in response between species, particularly between nonprimates and primates, and finally, that this antibody response is not predictive for humans.

Refractory osteoarthritis. Differential diagnosis and therapy.

The patient with osteoarthritis and severe or resistant pain should be evaluated for coexistent mechanical problems or distinct diseases. Treatment remains symptomatic and empiric. The value of many frequently used invasive therapies remains unproven given the large placebo response rate in osteoarthritis. In this article, the many new agents in development that may prove to be chondroprotective are discussed.

Recombinant human GM-CSF treatment of neutropenia in glycogen storage disease-1b.

PURPOSE: Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was administered to two patients with glycogen storage disease, type 1b (GSD-1b), with chronic neutropenia, neutrophil dysfunction, and recurrent infections in an effort to increase neutrophil counts and increase resistance to infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients' baseline absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) ranged from 56 to 480 cells/mm3 despite increased granulocyte precursors in the bone marrow. GM-CSF was given s.c. at starting doses of 500 micrograms/m2/day divided into two doses. RESULTS: After 48 h, ANC rose to 2,025 cells/mm3 and 3,132 cells/mm3, respectively. Absolute eosinophil counts also rose to 1,048 cells/mm3 (24%) and 4,820 cells/mm3 (33%) on days 10 and 9 in the two patients. Although an initial 10-day course of GM-CSF was tolerated in one patient without significant reactions, subsequent s.c. injections of GM-CSF were complicated by increasingly painful local reactions that necessitated discontinuation after 7 to 8 days. Intravenous infusion was associated with a febrile systemic reaction. Despite lack of improvement in neutrophil superoxide anion generation measured in one, both patients demonstrated unusually rapid healing of cutaneous infections on GM-CSF. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that GM-CSF may be useful for short-term treatment of serious infections in GSD-1b. However, alternate dosage schedules or different preparations of GM-CSF to diminish local reactions would be required for long-term maintenance therapy. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has also been shown to increase neutrophils in this disease and has not been associated with allergic reactions.

Phase I/II trial of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

Forty-seven patients with hematologic neoplasia received recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) by daily 2-hour infusion following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors in a phase I-II dose-escalation trial. Dose levels ranged from 30 to 500 micrograms/m2/d. At doses at or below 250 micrograms/m2/d, toxicity felt to be caused by rhGM-CSF was negligible. However, three of five patients treated with 500 micrograms/m2/d had unacceptable side effects caused by rhGM-CSF. Two different graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylactic regimens were administered. Twenty-seven evaluable patients were administered regimens that did not contain methotrexate (MTX) (Group I) and reached an absolute neutrophil count of 1,000/microL by a median of day 14. In contrast, 18 patients who received GVHD prophylactic regimens containing MTX (Group II) reached an absolute neutrophil count of 1,000/microL on a median of day 20. Patients in Group I had fewer febrile days and, of those discharged, had shorter initial hospitalizations than patients in Group II. The overall incidence of severe acute GVHD (grade 2 or greater) in the rhGM-CSF-treated patients was 28% and was similar to that in historical "good risk" patients who did not receive rhGM-CSF. These preliminary data suggest rhGM-CSF is unlikely to exacerbate GVHD in HLA-identical sibling donor transplants and indicate the need for randomized trials of rhGM-CSF in allogeneic marrow transplant patients.

Controlled evaluation of nabumetone in the treatment of active adult rheumatoid arthritis. Nabumetone versus naproxen double-blind parallel study.

Nabumetone is a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Therapy with nabumetone 1,000 mg given at bedtime was compared with naproxen 250 mg given twice daily in a prospective double-blind study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Both drugs were found to be efficacious in a comparable fashion. Both drugs were well tolerated in terms of patient withdrawal rates, which were 5 and 8 percent, respectively. Gastrointestinal side effects were the most commonly encountered problem. Nabumetone holds promise as an important new therapeutic approach in arthritis.

Six-month multi-center study comparing nabumetone with naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

This six-month, double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallel study at 13 medical centers compared the safety and efficacy of nabumetone (1,000 mg taken at bedtime) with that of naproxen (250 mg twice daily) in the treatment of osteoarthritis in symptomatic adult outpatients. Five efficacy parameters were measured: patients' assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, physicians' assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, and physicians' assessment of pain with respect to a declined activity. All 489 patients who took medication were included in the evaluation of safety, and 455 patients (227 in the nabumetone group and 228 in the naproxen group) were evaluated for efficacy. Significant improvement in all five efficacy parameters occurred in both groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups at the end of the study in any of the five efficacy parameters. Twenty-three percent of nabumetone and 17 percent of naproxen patients withdrew from the study for lack of efficacy. At least one possible or probable treatment-related adverse experience was reported for 45 percent of nabumetone-treated patients and 42 percent of those given naproxen, and in 19 percent of the nabumetone-treated and 18 percent of the naproxen-treated patients these experiences were moderate or severe. However, only 7 percent of patients in each group withdrew from the study due to adverse experiences. Nabumetone and naproxen have comparable safety and efficacy, suggesting that a single, nighttime dose of nabumetone is a convenient, effective, and safe treatment for osteoarthritis.