Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 46(5): 614-620, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28057390

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to establish whether the pre-emptive use of lornoxicam (16mg) in third molar surgery ensures successful postoperative analgesia and reduces rescue analgesic intake when compared to postoperative application, and in comparison with placebo. Ninety patients were split randomly into three groups: group A received lornoxicam 60min before surgery and placebo 60min after surgery; group B received placebo 60min before surgery and lornoxicam 60min after surgery; group C received placebo 60min before surgery and placebo 60min after surgery. Postoperative pain was recorded on a visual analogue scale and on a numerical rating scale at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h after surgery. The patients recorded total dose of paracetamol intake during the 24h after the procedure. The efficacy of postoperative analgesia was greater in lornoxicam groups when compared to the placebo group; there was no difference between the two lornoxicam groups (A and B). Patients in group C took their first rescue analgesic dose earlier after surgery than patients in the two lornoxicam groups. The average dose of paracetamol taken in group C was 1000mg, while it was500 mg in the lornoxicam groups.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Piroxicam/analogs & derivatives , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Mandible/surgery , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Piroxicam/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 46(4): 524-530, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28012633

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the submucosal injection of 1ml dexamethasone (4mg/ml) on pain, swelling, and trismus following the extraction of retained lower third molars. Ninety patients (mean age 23.5 years) were split randomly into three equal study groups (30 patients in each): the 'before' group received dexamethasone 15min before surgery and placebo 15min after surgery; the 'after' group received placebo 15min before surgery and dexamethasone 15min after surgery; the 'placebo' group received placebo 15min before surgery and placebo 15min after surgery. Postoperative pain was recorded by the patients using a visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h after surgery. The patients also recorded the total number of analgesic doses consumed during the 24h after the procedure. Swelling (determined using linear measurements of the face) and trismus (determined through measurement of maximum mouth opening) were assessed at 48h, 72h, and 7 days following surgery. Better control of pain, swelling, and trismus was demonstrated for dexamethasone in comparison to placebo. Postoperative dexamethasone provided better pain control than preoperative dexamethasone. There was no difference in total rescue analgesic intake between the preoperative and postoperative dexamethasone groups.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Edema/prevention & control , Mandible/surgery , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction , Trismus/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections , Male , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...