ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to design a convenient technique for dorsal minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of extra-articular fractures of both distal thirds of the humeral shaft as well as to characterise the course and proximity of the radial nerve (RN) and the axillary nerve (AN). METHODS: The collective consisted of 20 upper extremities of human adult body donors. A 3.5 mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP), an extra-articular distal humerus plate was inserted through a MIPO approach including two incisions. The primary incision was performed 5 cm in lenght on the dorsal side of the lateral epicondyle. An additional 5 cm incision was conducted distal to the humeral deltoid muscle insertion and the RN was depicted. The longest suitable plate was advanced under nerve protection starting distally and fixed by locking screws. A third incision with a length of 5 cm was made beginning at the distal border of the deltoid muscle, and a muscle split was performed to dissect the AN. The respective plate holes, where the AN and RN were located and the distances between the nerves were examined. RESULTS: The RN was mostly (30%) localised on holes 6 and 7 (starting distally). The AN laid directly on the plate in 65% and on the most proximal plate hole in 12 cases, but was never situated underneath the plate. The distance between the AN and RN was at mean 93.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: MIPO via a dorsal method proves to be a noteworthy technique and valuable option as indicated by our results. This 5-5-(5) concept may be performed as a two-incision or three-incision technique for extra-articular fractures of both distal thirds of the humerus.
Subject(s)
Humeral Fractures , Surgical Wound , Adult , Bone Plates , Feasibility Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Humerus/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We sought to evaluate the findings of our anatomically landmarks based mini-open procedure (MCTR) through a palmar approach and to compare its outcome and practicability to the conventional method (OCTR). The study consisted of 100 matched patients (n = 50 MCTR, n = 50 OCTR) with a minimum follow-up of three years. The outcome was characterized via the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH), Symptom Severity Scale (SSS), Functional Status Scale (FSC), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). All adverse events were observed. An alpha of 0.05 and a confidence level of 95% were set for statistical analyses. Both techniques showed comparable functional results in a long-term period (mean follow-up MCTR: 60 months and OCTR: 54 months). MCTR versus OCTR at mean: DASH: 4.6/8.3 (p = 0.398), SSS: 1.3/1.2 (p = 0.534), FSC: 1.3/1.2 (p = 0.617), VAS: 0.4/0.7 (p = 0.246). The MCTR convinced through a lower rate of scar sensibility (MCTR: 0% vs. OCTR: 12%, 0/50 vs. 6/50; p = 0.007) and pillar pain, as well as a shortened recovery period and surgical time relative to the OCTR. Low complication rates were observed in both groups, no recurrences had to be documented. The MCTR procedure revealed a similar good clinical outcome as the conventional technique. MCTR is a minimally-invasive, reliable, fast and simple procedure with an obvious benefit regarding scar sensibility.
Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome , Cicatrix , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Endoscopy , Feasibility Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The study goal was to evaluate the distances from the radial (RN), the musculocutaneous (MN) and axillary nerves (AN) and the medial neurovascular bundle of the upper arm to a minimally invasive applied plate and to define its relation to the RN during different degrees of malrotation during MIPO. The sample involved ten upper extremities. Application of a PHILOS plate was performed through a Delta-split. Intervals between the AN, MN, RN and the medial vascular bundle were defined at various positions. The humeral shaft was artificially fractured at a height of about the mean of the plate. The distal fragment was brought into 15° and 30° internal (IR) as well as external rotation (ER) and here, the plate's relation to the RN was evaluated. The medial neurovascular bundle intersected the plate at its distal part in two specimens. Regarding the distances from the RN to the plate during different rotation positions the distances became significantly longer during ER, respectively shorter during IR. The medial neurovascular bundle and the RN were identified as the main structures at risk. Care must be taken during distal screw placement and malrotation exceeding 15° must be avoided during MIPO.
Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Humerus/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cadaver , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Healing , Humans , Humeral Fractures/pathology , Humerus/injuries , Humerus/pathology , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/etiology , Radial Nerve/injuriesABSTRACT
This study aims to evaluate the relation between the lumbosacral trunk (LT) and the sacro-iliac joint (SIJ). In forty anatomic specimens (hemipelves) a classical antero-lateral approach to the SIJ was performed. The SIJ was marked at the linea terminalis (reference point A). Reference point B was situated at the upper edge of the interosseous sacro-iliac ligament. The length of the SIJ (distance A to B) and the distance between point A and the ventral branch of the fourth (L4) and fifth (L5) lumbar spinal nerves at the linea terminalis were measured. The SIJ had a mean length of 58.0 mm. The ventral branch of L5 was located closer to the SIJ in very long SIJs (mean length: ≥ 6.5 cm; mean distance: 9.8 mm) compared to very short joints (≤ 5 mm; mean distance: 11.3 mm). For the ventral branch of L4, very long SIJs had a mean distance of 7 mm and very short joints an average distance of 9.7 mm between point A and the nerve branch. A safe zone of approximately 1 cm to 2 cm (anterior to posterior) is present on the sacral surface (lateral to medial) for safe fixation of plates during anterior plate stabilization of the SIJ. Pelves with a shorter dorsoventral diameter of the most superior part of the SIJ apparently give more space for inserting plates.
Subject(s)
Lumbosacral Plexus/anatomy & histology , Sacroiliac Joint/anatomy & histology , Spinal Nerves/anatomy & histology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Plates , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Lumbosacral Plexus/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Sacroiliac Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to project the A1-pulley of the thumb onto the total thumb length to enable its complete division with and without direct sight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 50 hands from adult human cadavers. The proximal and distal borders of the A1-pulley were measured with reference to the first metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ). The length of the thumb was defined as the interval between the first carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) and the apex of the thumb. The length of the pulley is calculated proportionally with reference to the line between the first CMCJ and apex of the thumb. RESULTS: Approximated by computing 95% confidence intervals, the pulley can be expected to lie in an area between 34.0% (proximal border) and 57.8% (distal border) alongside this line. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous and minimally-invasive division of the A1-pulley needs to be performed between 34.0 and 57.8% of the length between the first CMCJ and apex of the thumb.