Deferasirox, deferiprone and desferrioxamine treatment in thalassemia major patients: cardiac iron and function comparison determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Oral deferiprone was suggested to be more effective than subcutaneous desferrioxamine for removing heart iron. Oral once-daily chelator deferasirox has recently been made commercially available but its long-term efficacy on cardiac iron and function has not yet been established. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of deferasirox, deferiprone and desferrioxamine on myocardial and liver iron concentrations and bi-ventricular function in thalassemia major patients by means of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. DESIGN AND METHODS: From the first 550 thalassemia subjects enrolled in the Myocardial Iron Overload in Thalassemia network, we retrospectively selected thalassemia major patients who had been receiving one chelator alone for longer than one year. We identified three groups of patients: 24 treated with deferasirox, 42 treated with deferiprone and 89 treated with desferrioxamine. Myocardial iron concentrations were measured by T2* multislice multiecho technique. Biventricular function parameters were quantitatively evaluated by cine images. Liver iron concentrations were measured by T2* multiecho technique. RESULTS: The global heart T2* value was significantly higher in the deferiprone (34 ± 11 ms) than in the deferasirox (21 ± 12 ms) and the desferrioxamine groups (27 ± 11 ms) (P = 0.0001). We found higher left ventricular ejection fractions in the deferiprone and the desferrioxamine versus the deferasirox group (P = 0.010). Liver iron concentration, measured as T2* signal, was significantly lower in the desferrioxamine versus the deferiprone and the deferasirox group (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The cohort of patients treated with oral deferiprone showed less myocardial iron burden and better global systolic ventricular function compared to the patients treated with oral deferasirox or subcutaneous desferrioxamine.

Painful procedures in children with cancer: comparison of moderate sedation and general anesthesia for lumbar puncture and bone marrow aspiration.

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to compare moderate sedation (MS) with general anesthesia (GA) in the management of frequently performed lumbar puncture or bone marrow aspiration (BMA) during the treatment of childhood cancer. PROCEDURE: The MS (14 patients for 30 procedures) was managed by non-anesthesiologists (combined nitrous oxide-midazolam +/- non-pharmacological techniques). The GA was managed by anesthesiologists (17 patients for 30 procedures). A neutral observer recorded side effects, use of sedative antagonists, recovery time, oncologist's evaluation, procedure behaviors check list (PBCL); subjective perceptions during the procedure with a questionnaire administered to children (>6 years) and their parents; drugs costs and professional resources. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: We had two inadequate sedations in MS (6.6%) versus 0 in GA. We had no significant differences in side effects (7.10% MS vs. 8.6% in GA), use of antagonists (2.90% GA vs. 0 MS), PBCL, oncologist evaluation and questionnaire data or drugs costs. We observed significant differences in recovery times (MS, mean 43 +/- SD min vs. GA, mean 117 +/- SD min) and professional resources costs. The effects of non-pharmacological techniques on anxiety were perceived very positively by both children and parents (on 0-4 scale, mean scores 3.57 for the children; 3.53 for the parents). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that MS compared favorably to GA with respect to both safety and efficacy. When performed by non-anesthesiologists, MS may be associated with better compliance and cost-effectiveness as it relies on the contribution of non-pharmacological techniques.

Long-term results of the first Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology protocol for the treatment of pediatric B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (AIEOP LNH92).

BACKGROUND: Childhood B-cell lymphomas (B-NHLs) represent a group of aggressive malignancies that are amenable to high-intensity chemotherapy regimens. In 1992, the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) initiated a prospective clinical trial involving the diagnosis and treatment of childhood B-NHL based on a well established strategy developed by the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Group. METHODS: Between November 1992 and October 1997, 163 children who had B-NHL were treated prospectively in the first national AIEOP trial. Disease staging was performed according to the St. Jude staging system, and treatment was assigned on the basis of risk group (R1, R2, or R3), which took into account disease stage and resectability and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. RESULTS: Of the 144 evaluable patients, 11 had Stage I disease, 35 had Stage II disease, 76 had Stage III disease, and 22 had Stage IV disease. Thirteen, 54, and 77 patients were included in risk groups R1, R2, and R3, respectively. The 10-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates for the overall population were 89.4% and 81.8%, respectively; the EFS rates for patients in risk groups R1, R2, and R3 were 100%, 86.9%, and 75.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that age > or = 10 years, disease histology other than Burkitt or Burkitt-like lymphoma, and LDH levels > or = 1000 international units per liter had negative prognostic value. Analysis of the toxicity (according to the World Health Organization grading system) associated with 710 of the 748 chemotherapy cycles administered revealed 855 cases of Grade 3 or 4 toxicity, with 73% being cases of hematologic toxicity. Toxic episodes were most common after the first chemotherapy cycle and were equally common in the R2 and R3 risk groups. To date, the development of a second malignancy has not been observed in any patient in the study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of the current study (AIEOP LNH92) confirms the observation of a favorable outcome for patients with B-NHL treated with short, intensive chemotherapy regimens and raises the possibility that non-Burkitt or non-Burkitt-like histology and age > or = 10 years may have negative prognostic value for patients with childhood B-NHL.

Osteonecrosis: An emerging complication of intensive chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Osteonecrosis (ON) is a potentially disabling complication of combination chemotherapy including high doses of steroids. The incidence and main risk factors for symptomatic ON have been investigated in a large group of children treated with high-dose steroids, prednisone and dexamethasone for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). DESIGN AND METHODS: From May 1995 to December 1999, 1421 patients <18 years old, with newly diagnosed non-B ALL, were registered in the AIEOP-ALL 95 study. Their data were reviewed to identify patients who developed symptomatic ON. For those who were positively identified additional data were requested concerning ON-related symptoms, treatment and outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 15 of the 1421 patients developed symptomatic ON (1.1%) in a total of 29 sites. The estimated 5-year cumulative risk for clinically diagnosed ON was 1.6% (SE 0.4). The incidence was significantly higher among females (p=0.01) and older patients, with a peak rate of 7.4% (2.3) among those aged 10 to 17 years (p<0.0001). When the two factors, i.e. age and gender were combined, there was a striking increase in the risk among female patients aged 10 to 17 years. The median time between the diagnosis of ALL and that of ON was 17 months (range 8-45). The hip was the most frequently involved (19/29) site. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic ON occurred in only 1.1% of patients treated with BFM-type, intensive chemotherapy for childhood ALL. Female adolescents appear to be the subset of patients with the highest risk of ON, especially when categorized as having high risk leukemia and thus administered higher cumulative doses of dexamethasone.

Use of percutaneous radial artery catheter for peripheral blood progenitor cell collection in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Leukapheresis procedures require adequate flow rates, which in children may frequently involve invasive vascular access placement. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A minimally invasive peripheral radial artery catheter was used for drawing blood in 85 leukapheresis procedures performed in 33 pediatric patients. Blood return to the patients was provided by either a central Broviac-type catheter or a peripheral venous access. The patients' age range was 1 to 18 years (median, 9.5) and the weight range was 9 to 73 kg (median, 29 kg). Vasocan Braunüle Luer Lock IV cannulas (22 gauge in 78 and 20 gauge in 7) were placed percutaneously under local anesthesia, and in 8 patients, catheter placement was carried out during general anesthesia for other procedures. A continuous flow cell separator was used in all cases (Fresenius AS104 in 23 and AS204 in 62). RESULTS: Flow rates ranged from 18 to 45 mL per minute, the mean number of total blood volumes processed was 2.07 (range, 0.51-2.51), and the mean duration of the procedures was 150 minutes (range, 90-260). The 22-gauge cannulas provided adequate flow rates independently of patient age and weight. No significant thrombotic, embolic, hemorrhagic, ischemic, or infectious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Peripheral radial artery catheters are safe, are minimally invasive, and provide steady, high-flow rates, and they should be considered for patients requiring leukapheresis and lacking a suitable vascular access for drawing blood.

A single high dose of idarubicin combined with high-dose ARA-C for treatment of first relapse in childhood 'high-risk' acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a study of the AIEOP group.

The outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and early relapse remains unsatisfactory. In January 1995, the AIEOP (Associazione Italiana di Oncologia ed Ematologia Pediatrica) group opened a trial for children with ALL in first isolated or combined bone marrow relapse defined at high risk according to the length of first remission and the immunophenotype. The treatment plan included the combination of a single high-dose idarubicin and high-dose cytarabine as induction therapy followed by an intensive consolidation and stem cell transplant (SCT). In total, 100 children from 16 Italian centres were enrolled; 80 out of the 99 evaluable patients (81%) achieved second complete remission; eight (8%) died during induction and 11 (11%) failed to respond. A total of 42 out of the 80 responders (52.5%) received a SCT: 19 from an identical sibling, 11 from a matched unrelated donor and 12 from umbilical cord blood cells. The estimated 4-year overall survival and event-free survival were 25% and 21% respectively. Disease-free survival at 4 years was 25.8% for the 80 responders. At 4 years, 39 out of 100 children remain alive, with 27 of them free of leukaemia. This induction therapy has shown antileukaemic efficacy with acceptable toxicity; moreover, all responders proved eligible for intensive consolidation.

Molecular profiling of high-risk neuroblastoma by cDNA array.

The aim of this study was to investigate gene expression changes in disseminated neuroblastoma by cDNA array technique. Three stage IV neuroblastomas and one neuroblastoma cell line (SK-N-FI) were analyzed. Expression profiles were confirmed by semiquantitative RT-PCR and in some instances by Northern blotting. Comparison of expression profiles identified several genes which were highly expressed as well as some which were down-regulated in tumor samples relatively to SK-N-FI cells. The tumors studied lacked N-myc overexpression, while showing up-regulation of basic transcription factors, growth factors and receptors such as NSEP, c-myc binding protein MM1, thymosin beta10 (TMSB10), TNF-R superfamily member 10A (TNFRSF10A) and FZ9. These results suggest that cDNA array technology is a powerful tool to identify a set of genes involved in neuroblastoma genesis and progression. Thus, the sensitive cDNA array may provide new insight into many aspects of pediatric tumors and play crucial role in the administration of adjuvant therapy of patients with neuroblastoma.