Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
AIDS Behav ; 23(Suppl 2): 162-171, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31359218

ABSTRACT

How does the endorsement of different dimensions of gender norms by men and/or women influence their use of HIV testing and antiretroviral treatment? This question was examined using data from a 2014 population-based survey of 1053 women and 1004 men, ages 18-49, in rural South Africa. We used a global measure for views toward gender norms (the GEM Scale), plus four subsets of scale items (all reliabilities ≥ 0.7). In multivariate analyses using the global measure, endorsement of inequitable gender norms was associated with more testing (AOR 2.47, p < 0.01) and less treatment use (AOR 0.15, p < 0.01) among women but not men. When examining specific subsets of inequitable norms (e.g., endorsing men as the primary decision-maker), decreased odds of treatment use was found for men as well (AOR 0.18, p < 0.01). Careful attention to the role specific gender norms play in HIV service uptake can yield useful programmatic recommendations.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Social Norms , Adolescent , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Data Collection , Female , Gender Identity , HIV Infections/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population , Serologic Tests , Socioeconomic Factors , South Africa , Young Adult
2.
S Afr Med J ; 109(4): 227-231, 2019 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31084686

ABSTRACT

Current research suggests that HIV self-screening (HIVSS) is a feasible and acceptable approach to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM). However, few data are available to shape policy around dissemination and implementation. Gaps in knowledge include preferences for distribution of HIVSS kits, potential social harms and benefits of their use, and how much test users would be willing to pay for the kits. The aim was to inform policy recommendations to optimise distribution of HIVSS kits to MSM in South Africa (SA), where there is a high HIV incidence and unmet testing needs. MSM in the high-HIV-prevalence Gert Sibande and Ehlanzeni districts of Mpumalanga Province, SA, were enrolled between October 2015 and May 2017. Participants were provided with their choice of blood or oral fluid HIVSS test kits, receiving 5 kits at enrolment and 4 additional kits at the 3-month follow-up visit. Questionnaires were administered at enrolment, 3 months and 6 months. We analysed participants' reported social benefits and harms, and their preferences for kit distribution and pricing. Among 127 MSM screened and enrolled, 114 responded to follow-up questionnaires regarding distribution preferences, 49.3% preferred to acquire HIVSS kits at a community-based organisation (CBO) and 42.7% at a clinic, with 8% preferring a pharmacy. Participants with higher education preferred CBO sites for distribution; in other respects preferences were similar by demographic characteristics. Reported social benefits were common, including knowing one's status, prevention knowledge gained and improved communication with partners. Despite ubiquitous interest in using the kits, the majority of MSM could not afford to purchase test kits. SA guidelines have integrated HIVSS into HIV and testing policy, but little has been published regarding distribution channels of the kits for MSM and other key populations. There is a partnership between the National Department of Health and CBOs that specialise in key population programming to ensure MSM and other populations with unmet testing needs can access affordable test kits. We observed no social harms, and there were multiple social benefits. Consequently, we recommend immediate free or low-cost distribution of HIVSS kits to MSM through community-based initiatives. Future research should continue to assess optimised linkage to care.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Self Evaluation , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Health Policy , Homosexuality, Male , Mass Screening , Patient Preference/psychology , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Adolescent , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/psychology , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Patient Preference/economics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/economics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/supply & distribution , Self Report , South Africa , Young Adult
3.
Int J STD AIDS ; 21(2): 105-9, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20089995

ABSTRACT

We determined the prevalence, distribution and correlates of human papillomavirus (HPV) types in 386 mixed-income, sexually active women in São Paulo, Brazil. Endocervical samples were tested for HPV DNA with L1 primers MY09 and MY11; negative and indeterminate samples were retested using GP 5+/6+ consensus primers. HPV was detected in 35% of all women; high-risk/probable high-risk types in 20%; low-risk types in 7%; and an indeterminate type in 10%. Twenty-five HPV types were found overall: 17 (probable) high-risk types and eight low-risk types. Approximately one-third (29%) of women with HPV infection were positive for type 16 or 18 and 36% were positive for types 6, 11, 16 or 18. The presence of (probable) high-risk HPV was associated with younger age, more lifetime sex partners and abnormal vaginal flora. Additional studies mapping the distribution of HPV types worldwide are necessary to prepare for vaccination programmes and direct future vaccine development.


Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Female , Humans , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Prevalence , Risk Factors
4.
AIDS Care ; 20(7): 764-70, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18767210

ABSTRACT

HIV-related stigma and discrimination (S&D) have been shown to impede prevention, care and treatment. Yet, few quantitative studies have tested the associations between stigma, service utilization and status disclosure, especially in countries with concentrated HIV epidemics. Surveys, administered to a random sample of 1,775 truck drivers crossing Southern borders in Brazil, included items on multiple conceptual domains of S&D, such as fear of casual contact and blame towards people living with HIV/AIDS. Pearson's chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to examine correlations. Less stigma (both individual items and grouped as a scale) was significantly correlated with VCT use (p

Subject(s)
HIV Infections/psychology , HIV-1 , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Prejudice , Stereotyping , Truth Disclosure , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emigration and Immigration , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Social Isolation , Transportation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...