Transcriptomic investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to the neonicotinoid thiamethoxam and the pyrethroid lambda-cyhalothrin in Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).

BACKGROUND: Laboratory-selected resistant strains of Euschistus heros to thiamethoxam (NEO) and lambda-cyhalothrin (PYR) were recently reported in Brazil. However, the mechanisms conferring resistance to these insecticides in E. heros remain unresolved. We utilized comparative transcriptome profiling and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling of susceptible and resistant strains of E. heros to investigate the molecular mechanism(s) underlying resistance. RESULTS: The E. heros transcriptome was assembled, generating 91 673 transcripts with a mean length of 720 bp and N50 of 1795 bp. Comparative gene expression analysis between the susceptible (SUS) and NEO strains identified 215 significantly differentially expressed (DE) transcripts. DE transcripts associated with the xenobiotic metabolism were all up-regulated in the NEO strain. The comparative analysis of the SUS and PYR strains identified 204 DE transcripts, including an esterase (esterase FE4), a glutathione-S-transferase, an ABC transporter (ABCC1) and aquaporins that were up-regulated in the PYR strain. We identified 9588 and 15 043 nonsynonymous SNPs in the PYR and NEO strains. One of the SNPs (D70N) detected in the NEO strain occurs in a subunit (α5) of the nAChRs, the target site of neonicotinoid insecticides. Nevertheless, this residue position in α5 is not conserved among insects. CONCLUSIONS: Neonicotinoid and pyrethroid resistance in laboratory-selected E. heros is associated with a potential metabolic resistance mechanism by the overexpression of proteins commonly involved in the three phases of xenobiotic metabolism. Together these findings provide insight into the potential basis of resistance in E. heros and will inform the development and implementation of resistance management strategies against this important pest. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Baseline Response, Monitoring, and Cross-Resistance of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Sodium Channel Blocker Insecticides in Brazil.

Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is one of the key cross-crop pests in Brazilian agroecosystems. Field-evolved resistance of S. frugiperda to some conventional insecticides and Bt proteins has already been reported. Thus, the use of insecticides with new mode of action such as sodium channel blockers (indoxacarb and metaflumizone) could be an important tool in insecticide resistance management (IRM) programs. To implement a proactive IRM, we conducted baseline response and monitoring to indoxacarb and metaflumizone in 87 field populations of S. frugiperda collected from major maize-growing regions of Brazil from 2017 to 2020, estimated the frequency of resistance alleles to indoxacarb, and evaluated cross-resistance of indoxacarb and metaflumizone to some selected insecticides and Bt proteins. Low variation in susceptibility to indoxacarb (4.6-fold) and metaflumizone (2.6-fold) was detected in populations of S. frugiperda in 2017. The frequency of the resistance allele to indoxacarb was 0.0452 (0.0382-0.0527 CI 95%), by using F2 screen method. The mean survival at diagnostic concentration, based on CL99, varied from 0.2 to 12.2% for indoxacarb and from 0.0 to 12.7% for metaflumizone, confirming high susceptibility of S. frugiperda to these insecticides in Brazil. No cross-resistance was detected between sodium channel blocker insecticides and other insecticides (organophosphate, pyrethroid, benzoylurea, spinosyn, and diamide) and Bt proteins. These findings showed that sodium channel blocker insecticides are important candidates to be exploited in IRM strategies of S. frugiperda in Brazil.

Resistance of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to spinetoram: inheritance and cross-resistance to spinosad.

BACKGROUND: The use of spinosyn insecticides is one of the major control strategies of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in Brazil. In this study, we selected a spinetoram-resistant strain from a field-population of S. frugiperda to characterize the inheritance of the resistance and cross-resistance relationship between spinosyn insecticides. RESULTS: The values of LC50 (95% CI) obtained from concentration-response bioassays were 0.63 (0.55-0.73) µg spinetoram mL-1 for the susceptible strain (SUS), and 1170.96 (1041.61-1323.89) µg spinetoram mL-1 for the strain resistant to spinetoram (SPT-R). These values resulted in a resistance ratio of 1844-fold. The SPT-R strain showed cross-resistance with spinosad (resistance ratio = 1196-fold). The reciprocal crosses showed LC50 values of 3.91 (2.97-5.84) and 5.37 (4.52-6.52) µg spinetoram mL-1 , suggesting that the resistance of S. frugiperda to spinetoram is autosomal and incompletely recessive. The backcrosses of the F1 progeny with the SPT-R strain suggest a resistance with polygenic effect. Estimates of the effective number of loci with equal contributions to the resistance effect were from 1.18 to 1.76, suggesting that resistance to spinetoram is associated with a few genes. CONCLUSION: The inheritance pattern of resistance of S. frugiperda to spinetoram was characterized as autosomal, incompletely recessive and polygenic. Cross-resistance between spinosyns was confirmed in S. frugiperda. The importance of this information for implementing insect resistance management strategies is discussed in this paper. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Selection and characterization of the inheritance of resistance of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to chlorantraniliprole and cross-resistance to other diamide insecticides.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the genetic basis of insect resistance to insecticides can help to implement insecticide resistance management (IRM) strategies. In this study, we selected a strain of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistant to chlorantraniliprole using the F2 screen method, characterized the inheritance of resistance and evaluated patterns of cross-resistance to other diamide insecticides. RESULTS: The chlorantraniliprole-resistant strain (Chlorant-R) was selected from a field-collected population with an estimated allele frequency of 0.1316. The estimated median lethal concentration (LC50 ) values were 0.011 and 2.610 µg a.i. cm-2 for the susceptible (Sus) and Chlorant-R strains, respectively, resulting in a resistance ratio (RR) of 237-fold. The LC50 values of the reciprocal crosses were 0.155 and 0.164 µg a.i. cm-2 , indicating that resistance is autosomally inherited. Resistance was characterized as incompletely recessive and monogenic at concentrations close to the recommended field rates of chlorantraniliprole. Survival of the resistant strain and heterozygous larvae in maize plants treated at the field rate was ∼ 60 (similar to the susceptible strain on untreated maize) and 15%, respectively. The Chlorant-R strain showed low cross-resistance to cyantraniliprole (RR ∼ 27-fold) and very high cross-resistance to flubendiamide (RR > 42 000-fold). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of chlorantraniliprole resistance allele was moderately high in a field-collected population of S. frugiperda. The inheritance of chlorantraniliprole resistance was characterized as autosomal, incompletely recessive and monogenic. S. frugiperda showed cross-resistance to other diamide insecticides. These results provide essential information for the implementation of IRM programs to preserve the useful life of diamide insecticides for controlling S. frugiperda in Brazil. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.