Avaliação dos resultados do uso do hialuronato de sódio intra-articular no pós-operatório da artroscopia do joelho / Results evaluation of the use of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate in the post-operative knee arthroscopy

Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia do uso do ácido hialurônico no pós-operatório de artroscopia de joelho Métodos: Foram avaliados 49 pacientes submetidos ao procedimento artroscópico associado ao uso do ácido hialurônico intra-articular (Grupo I) e 49 pacientes submetidos ao procedimento artroscópico sem uso do ácido hialurônico (Grupo II). Os pacientes foram avaliados com base na Escala Visual Analógica de dor (EVA), analgesia domiciliar, amplitude do movimento do joelho com goniômetro e no questionário Lysholm. Resultados: Não ocorreram efeitos adversos significativos em nenhum dos dois grupos. Conclusão: O uso do ácido hialurônico no pós-operatório de artroscopia de joelho é justificado por levar a uma diminuição da dor na fase inicial e possibilitar uma recuperação mais rápida do paciente. .

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of hyaluronic acid in the post-operative of knee arthroscopy. Methods: we have evaluated 49 patients undergoing arthroscopic procedure with the use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (Group 1) and 49 patients undergoing arthroscopic procedure without the use of hyaluronic acid (Group 2). Patients were evaluated based on the Visual Analogue Scale, household analgesia, assessment of the Range of Motion with a goniometer, and the Lysholm questionnaire. Results: there were no substantial adverse effects on either group. Conclusion: the use of hyaluronic acid in the post-operative of knee arthroscopy is justified due/because it leads to a decrease in pain in the early stage, enabling faster recovery of the patient. .

Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear which fixation of total knee arthroplasty obtains the best clinical, functional and radiographic results in people with osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of cemented, cementless and hybrid knee prostheses fixation techniques in participants with primary osteoarthritis (osteoarthritis following trauma was not included) and other non-traumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (2011, issue 10), MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Current Controlled Trials, LILACS, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SPORTDiscus, Health Technology Assessment Database and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, all from implementation to October 2011, along with handsearches of high-yield journals and reference lists of articles. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating cemented, cementless and hybrid fixation. Participants included patients that were 18 years or older with osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases who were undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently selected the eligible trials, assessed the trial quality, risk of bias and extracted data. Researchers were contacted to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS: Five RCTs and 297 participants were included in this review. Using meta-analysis on roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) we observed that cemented fixation of the tibial components demonstrated smaller displacement in relation to cementless fixation (with and without hydroxyapatite) after a follow-up of two years (maximum total point-motion, N = 167, two RCTs, mean difference (MD) = 0.52 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.74). However, the risk of future aseptic loosening with uncemented fixation was approximately half that of cemented fixation according to the arthroplasty instability classification (moderate quality as assessed by GRADE) inferred from RSA (N = 216, three RCTs, risk ratio (RR) = 0.47, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.92) with a 16% absolute risk difference between groups. The number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) to prevent future aseptic loosening was 7 (95% CI 5 to 44). There was a low risk of bias for RSA among the studies included. It was not possible to perform meta-analysis on patient-important outcomes, such as the survival rate of the implant (any change of a component), patient global assessments, functional measures, pain, health-related quality of life measures and adverse events. Almost all included studies recorded functional measures of Knee Society and Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores, but the authors of each study found no significant difference between the groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was a smaller displacement of the cemented tibial component in relation to the cementless fixation in studies with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis participants who underwent primary total knee prosthesis with a follow-up of two years; however, the cemented fixation presented a greater risk of future aseptic loosening than cementless fixation.

Estudo prospectivo randomizado entre as fixações transversas e extracorticais nas reconstruções do ligamento cruzado anterior / Randomized prospective study comparing transverse and extracortical fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJETIVO: Comparar prospectivamente as fixações transversas (Cross-PinTM) com as extracorticais (EZLocTM) no fêmur nas reconstruções cirúrgicas do ligamento cruzado anterior sob o ponto de vista clínico, biomecânico e funcional. MÉTODOS: Entre abril de 2007 e novembro de 2009, 50 pacientes com lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior, agudas e crônicas, foram submetidos à reconstrução por abordagem artroscópica utilizando os tendões flexores homólogos (grácil e semitendíneo). A randomização do método de fixação femoral ocorreu por meio de sorteio no momento da cirurgia. Excluímos os pacientes portadores de lesões ligamentares múltiplas, fraturas, cirurgias prévias, doenças autoimunes e comprometimento do membro contralateral. Foram utilizadas as escalas de Lysholm, o questionário qualidade de vida SF-36 e o artrômetro KT-1000TM. RESULTADOS: Após 18,1 meses, em média, não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os grupos quanto utilizadas as escalas de Lysholm e as medidas do KT-1000TM. Quanto aos resultados do SF-36, observamos diferença significante com superioridade da fixação transversa considerando a dor e a vitalidade. CONCLUSÃO: As duas técnicas mostraram ser eficientes na fixação transfemoral com tendões flexores, porém quase sem nenhuma diferença estatística significante. Entendemos que novos estudos serão necessários para melhor entendimento dessas diferenças.

OBJECTIVE: This study had the objective of prospectively comparing transverse fixation (Cross-PinTM) with extracortical fixation (EZLocTM) for the femur, in surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, from a clinical, biomechanical and functional point of view. METHODS: Between April 2007 and November 2009, 50 patients with acute or chronic anterior cruciate ligament injuries underwent arthroscopic reconstruction using the homologous flexor tendons (gracilis and semitendinosus). Randomization of the femoral fixation method was done by means of a draw at the time of the procedure. Patients were excluded if they presented multiple ligament lesions, fractures, previous surgery, autoimmune disease and impairment of the contralateral knee. The Lysholm scale, SF36 quality-of-life questionnaire and KT1000TM arthrometer were used. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 18.1 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the Lysholm scale and KT1000TM measurements. However, the SF36 questionnaire showed a statistical difference such that transverse fixation was superior regarding pain and vitality. CONCLUSION: Both techniques were shown to be efficient for transfemoral fixation, but with almost no statistically significant difference between them. We believe that new studies will be necessary for better understanding of these differences.

Tratamento cirúrgico das lesões osteocondrais do joelho com mosaicoplastia / Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee with mosaicplasty

OBJETIVO: Avaliação dos resultados funcionais da técnica de mosaicoplastia em joelhos de pacientes com lesão osteocondral. MÉTODOS: No período de agosto de 1999 a março de 2005, 27 pacientes foram submetidos à mosaicoplastia do joelho. Vinte e um eram do sexo masculino e seis, do feminino. A idade variou de 16 a 64 anos (média de 38,1 anos). Dezessete lesões eram do lado direito e 10, do esquerdo. Em relação à localização da lesão, quatro (15 por cento) situaram-se no côndilo femoral lateral, 18 (66,5 por cento) no côndilo femoral medial e 5 (18,5 por cento) na patela. O tamanho das lesões variou de 1 a 8cm² (média de 2,7cm²). Os pacientes operados foram avaliados no pré e pós-operatórios pela escala funcional de Lysholm, com seguimento médio de 2,5 anos. RESULTADOS: O pré-operatório teve uma média de 62,7 pontos e o pós-operatório uma média de 95,4 pontos. Os pacientes submetidos à mosaicoplastia no côndilo femoral lateral apresentaram, no pré-operatório, a média de pontos de 51,5 pontos e, no pós-operatório, média de 100 pontos. No côndilo femoral medial a média no pré-operatório foi de 64,1 pontos e, no pós-operatório, de 95,4 pontos. Com relação à patela, a média do pré-operatório foi de 66,4 pontos e, do pós-operatório, de 92 pontos. CONCLUSÃO: A mosaicoplastia mostrou-se uma boa alternativa no tratamento das lesões osteocondrais do joelho. Entretanto, apresentou melhor evolução nas lesões dos côndilos femorais em relação às localizadas na patela.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional results of mosaicplasty in knees of patients with osteochondral lesion. METHODS: Between August 1999 and March 2005, twenty-seven patients were submitted to mosaicplasty on the knee. Twenty-one were male and six female. The patients' ages ranged from 16 to 64 years (average 38.1 years). Seventeen lesions were located on the right knee and ten on the left one. The lesion was located on the lateral condyle in 4 patients (15 percent), on the medial condyle in 18 patients (66.5 percent) and on the patella in 5 patients (18.5 percent). The lesion sizes varied from 1 to 8 cm² (average 2.7 cm²). The patients operated on were evaluated before and after surgery by the functional Lysholm scale, with an average follow-up of 2.5 years. RESULTS: In the preoperative evaluation, the average was 62.7 points, evolving to 95.4 points in the postoperative evaluation. The patients submitted to mosaicplasty in the lateral condyle presented an average of 51.5 points before surgery, evolving to 100 points after surgery. The patients submitted to mosaicplasty in the medial condyle had presented average of 64.1 points before surgery, evolving to 95.4 points after surgery. The patients submitted to mosaicplasty on the patella presented average of 66.4 points before surgery, evolving to 92 points in the postoperative evaluation. CONCLUSION: Mosaicplasty proved to be a good alternative for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee, showing better evolution in lesions located on the femoral condyles than in lesions located on the patella.