Radiological contribution to the diagnosis of early postoperative complications after lung resection for primary tumor: a revisional study.

In the post-operative course of the interventions of lung resection for primary tumor, complications of different nature and severity can arise, recognizing different pathogenetic mechanisms and differing according to the type of resection performed and to the time elapsed after surgery. The low diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography requires a thorough knowledge of the radiologist about all radiographic findings, both normal and pathological, which can be found in the immediate post-operative period (within 30 days after surgery). This article aims to describe the incidence, the clinical features and the radiological aspects of immediate complications following pulmonary resections, with specific reference to those in which the diagnostic imaging provides a fundamental contribution.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients with previously resected liver metastasis: pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data addressing the outcomes and patterns of recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and previously resected liver metastasis are limited. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for studies assessing PM in CRC and gathered individual data for patients who had PM and a previous curative liver resection. The influence of potential factors on overall survival (OS) was analyzed through univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Between 1983 and 2009, 146 patients from five studies underwent PM and had previous liver resection. The median interval from resection of liver metastasis until detection of lung metastasis and the median follow-up from PM were 23 and 48 months, respectively. Five-year OS and recurrence-free survival rates calculated from the date of PM were 54.4 and 29.3 %, respectively. Factors predicting inferior OS in univariate analysis included thoracic lymph node (LN) involvement and size of largest lung nodule ≥2 cm. Adjuvant chemotherapy and whether lung metastasis was detected synchronous or metachronous to liver metastasis had no influence on survival. In multivariate analysis, thoracic LN involvement emerged as the only independent factor (hazard ratio 4.86, 95 % confidence interval 1.56-15.14, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: PM offers a chance for long-term survival in selected patients with CRC and previously resected liver metastasis. Thoracic LN involvement predicted poor prognosis; therefore, significant efforts should be undertaken for adequate staging of the mediastinum before PM. In addition, adequate intraoperative LN sampling allows proper prognostic stratification and enrollment in novel adjuvant therapy trials.

Exploring Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: development of a prognostic model predicting 5-year survival after surgical resection†.

OBJECTIVES: Despite impressive results in diagnosis and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), more than 30% of patients with Stage I NSCLC die within 5 years after surgical treatment. Identification of prognostic factors to select patients with a poor prognosis and development of tailored treatment strategies are then advisable. The aim of our study was to design a model able to define prognosis in patients with Stage I NSCLC, submitted to surgery with curative intent. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of two surgical registries was performed. Predictors of survival were investigated using the Cox model with shared frailty (accounting for the within-centre correlation). Candidate predictors were: age, gender, smoking habit, morbidity, previous malignancy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, clinical N stage, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), forced expiratory volume in 1 s, carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO), extent of surgical resection, systematic lymphadenectomy, vascular invasion, pathological T stage, histology and histological grading. The final model included predictors with P < 0.20, after a backward selection. Missing data in evaluated predictors were multiple-imputed and combined estimates were obtained from 10 imputed data sets. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 848 consecutive patients. The median follow-up was 48 months. Two hundred and nine patients died (25%), with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 74%. The final Cox model demonstrated that mortality was significantly associated with age, male sex, presence of cardiac comorbidities, DLCO (%), SUV(max), systematic nodal dissection, presence of microscopic vascular invasion, pTNM stage and histological grading. The final model showed a fair discrimination ability (C-statistic = 0.69): the calibration of the model indicated a good agreement between observed and predicted survival. CONCLUSIONS: We designed an effective prognostic model based on clinical, pathological and surgical covariates. Our preliminary results need to be refined and validated in a larger patient population, in order to provide an easy-to-use prognostic tool for Stage I NSCLC patients.

Air leaks following pulmonary resection for malignancy: risk factors, qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Air leaks are a common complication of pulmonary resection. The aims of this study were to analyze risk factors for postoperative air leak and to evaluate the role of air leak measurement in identifying patients at increased risk for cardiorespiratory morbidity and prolonged air leak. From March to December 2009, 142 consecutive patients underwent pulmonary resection for malignancy and were prospectively followed up. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for air leak were evaluated. Air leaks were qualitatively and quantitatively labeled twice daily. There were 52 (36.6%) patients who had an air leak on day 1, and 32 (22.5%) who had an air leak on day 2. Air leak was ≥180 ml/min in 12 (37.5%) of these patients. Independent predictors of air leak on day 2 included type of pulmonary resection, presence of adhesions, and incomplete fissures. Cardiorespiratory morbidity was significantly higher (34.4%) in patients who experienced air leak on day 2 than in those who did not (10.9%) (P=0.002). Nine (75%) out of 12 patients with air leak ≥180 ml/min on day 2 had prolonged air leak (greater than five days) (P=0.0001).

Use of the proposals of the international association for the study of lung cancer in the forthcoming edition of lung cancer staging system to predict long-term prognosis of operated patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of the proposals of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) in the forthcoming 7th edition of lung cancer staging system to classify patients submitted to radical surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer and to compare their value in predicting long-term prognosis with the existing 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) TNM classification. METHODS: Nine hundred twenty-one patients received an anatomic resection and hilar-mediastinal dissection for primary non-small cell lung cancer during the period 1990 to 2005. Histopathologic staging following the actual AJCC/UICC TNM classification were as follows: 207 T1, 562 T2, 148 T3, and 4 T4; 570 N0, 149 N1, 198 N2, and 4 N3; 163 stage IA, 346 IB, 23 IIA, 157 IIB, 224 IIIA, and 8 IIIB. Stages reclassified using the proposals of IASLC for the new staging system were as follows: 101 T1a, 106 T1b, 400 T2a, 103 T2b, 210 T3, and 1 T4; 163 stage IA, 262 IB, 157 IIA, 106 IIB, 230 IIIA, and 4 IIIB. RESULTS: Follow-up was obtained for 836 patients. Mean follow-up was 46.5 +/- 48.9 months. N-status (unchanged between the 2 classifications) was confirmed to be a significant prognostic factor. Significant differences in 10-year disease-related survival were demonstrated between stages IIB and IIIA only (35% vs 14%) of the AJCC/UICC TNM classification and between stages IB and IIA (60% vs 46%) and stages IIB and IIIA (39% vs 15%) of the IASLC proposals for a new classification. DISCUSSION: The proposals of IASLC in the forthcoming 7th edition of the lung cancer staging system are demonstrated to be better able to separate prognostically distinct groups of patients operated for non-small cell lung cancer than the accepted existing 6th AJCC/UICC TNM classification.