Influence of everolimus on steady-state pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in maintenance renal transplant patients.

To investigate possible interactions of the novel immunosuppressant everolimus with cyclosporine, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase I study was performed. Everolimus regimens (0.75-10 mg/d) were administered for 28 days to stable renal allograft recipients receiving the microemulsion form of cyclosporine. Steady-state cyclosporine profiles were assessed at baseline on day 0 (cyclosporine alone) and on day 21 with everolimus on steady state. By day 21, mean dose-normalized cyclosporine AUC0-12 increased by 15% in patients receiving placebo. In everolimus-treated patients, mean increases in cyclosporine AUC0-12 ranged from 7% to 43%, which were not significantly different across all dosing cohorts including placebo. Linear regression of everolimus AUC on day 21 versus the increase in cyclosporine AUC0-12 yielded a slope not significantly different from a horizontal line (P = ns). In conclusion, these results suggest that steady-state everolimus exposure over the wide range assessed in this study did not affect steady-state cyclosporine pharmacokinetics.

Tolerability and steady-state pharmacokinetics of everolimus in maintenance renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Current immunosuppressant regimens need to be improved to prevent acute and chronic graft rejection. The novel macrocyclic immunosuppressant everolimus (Certican, RAD) is currently in clinical development to address this issue. METHODS: The primary objective of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating phase 1 study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of everolimus at four dose levels (0.75, 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/day) in maintenance renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporin and steroids. The secondary objective was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of two different formulations (capsule and tablet) of everolimus. RESULTS: Fifty-four subjects were randomized for 4 weeks treatment with everolimus (n = 44) or placebo (n = 10). Dose levels of everolimus between 0.75 and 5 mg daily were well tolerated, permitting dose escalation to the highest everolimus dose of 10 mg daily. At this dose, everolimus was associated with a higher incidence and severity of adverse events, most notably thrombocytopenia. Pharmacodynamic assessment showed a relationship between drug exposure and thrombocytopenia. Notable reversible elevations of cholesterol were also observed at the 10 mg/day dose. Other changes in laboratory evaluations, including triglycerides, were minor, reversible and did not appear to be dose dependent. The bioavailability of the tablet formulation was 2.6-fold higher compared with the capsule, with evidence for dose proportionality over the dose range tested. Within-subject pharmacokinetic variability was low (coefficient of variation: 10-19%); however, between-subject variability ranged from 34 to 60% for AUC and C(max). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that up to 5 mg/day everolimus results in a dose-proportional exposure, and is adequately well tolerated in renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin and steroids.

Effect of food on everolimus absorption: quantification in healthy subjects and a confirmatory screening in patients with renal transplants.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To quantify the influence of a high-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of the immunosuppressant everolimus in a single-dose study in healthy subjects and to confirm the results in a small food-effect screening assessment in patients with renal transplants who were receiving multiple-dose everolimus. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose study and confirmatory screening. SETTING: Phase 1 unit for the single-dose study and two German hospitals for the patient screening. SUBJECTS: Twenty-four healthy male volunteers; six clinically stable patients with renal transplants who were originally part of a phase I dose-escalation study. INTERVENTION: The 24 healthy men received everolimus 2 mg orally under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal. The six patients received everolimus 2.5 mg/day orally, in addition to cyclosporine and prednisone. On two occasions, a pharmacokinetic profile was obtained over the dosing interval after drug administration under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal in a randomized sequence. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the single-dose study in healthy subjects, a high-fat meal delayed everolimus time to maximum concentration (Tmax) by a median 1.25 hours, reduced peak blood concentration (Cmax) by 60%, and reduced area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 16%. In the multiple-dose screening in patients with renal transplants, a high-fat meal delayed Tmax by a median 1.75 hours and reduced Cmax by 53% and AUC by 21%. Everolimus trough levels showed no food effect, whereas the peak-trough fluctuation was dampened by 52%. CONCLUSIONS: A high-fat meal modestly reduced everolimus AUC. To minimize longitudinal variability in exposure, everolimus should be administered consistently either with food or without food.