Patients with abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction a decade after surgery: A comprehensive long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal-based free flap has increasingly become the gold standard for breast reconstruction, however long-term evidence of the aesthetic outcome and quality of life is lacking. The present study aims to gain an overview of patients with abdominal-based free flap breast reconstructions in a long-term perspective. METHODS: Seventy-five patients who received abdominal-based free flap breast reconstructions between 2000-2007 in Uppsala, Sweden were invited back for photographs, 3D imaging and questionnaires. A retrospective chart review was conducted. Patient satisfaction with appearance and quality of life were assessed using the Breast-Q questionnaire. A layman panel and a professional panel rated the aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast from photographs and 3D images. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients participated with a mean age of 52 ±â€¯8 years at the time of reconstruction and a mean follow-up time of 11.4 ±â€¯1.8 years completed the study. The majority of the patients had received unilateral (85%), delayed reconstructions (73%) with prior radiation (55%). There were 53 patients with DIEP flaps, one with free TRAM flap and one with SIEA flap. Breast-Q scores in the cohort were comparable to normative values of women without breast cancer (p < 0.001). There was a high level of agreement for the aesthetic results of the reconstructions between patient, professionals and layman panels (0.89 ICC, 95% CI: 0.83  - 0.93). CONCLUSION: Abdominal-based free flap reconstructions were effective in achieving a lasting positive aesthetic result and a high quality of life in patients a decade after surgery.

A clinical review of 9 years of free perforator flap breast reconstructions: an analysis of 675 flaps and the influence of new techniques on clinical practice.

The aim of this study is to review our 9-year experience with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstructions to help others more easily overcome the pitfalls we experienced. A chart review was conducted for all 543 patients who had 622 DIEP breast reconstructions in our clinic between January 2000 and January 2009. In this time, there were an additional 28 superior gluteal artery perforator and 25 superficial inferior epigastric artery reconstructions, bringing the total free flap reconstructions to 675. In the early years, the success rate was 90.7%, the average operative time was 7 hours and 18 minutes, and the complication rate was 33.3%; these have improved to 98.2%, 4 hours and 8 minutes, and 19.3%, respectively. We describe our selection criteria, preoperative vascular mapping, surgical techniques, and postoperative monitoring as they relate to these improvements in outcome, operative time, and complications. The DIEP flap is a safe and reliable option in breast reconstructions. By acquiring experience with the flap and introducing new and improving existing techniques we have improved the ease of the procedure and the success rate and have shortened the operative time.

Introduction of the implantable Doppler system did not lead to an increased salvage rate of compromised flaps: a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler system was introduced at the Uppsala University Hospital to ease free flap monitoring and improve salvage rates by an earlier detection of vascular compromise. The aim of the current analysis was to investigate whether the system indeed improved the salvage rate of revisions. METHODS: All cases that needed revision among a consecutive series of patients being monitored with the implantable Doppler system between June of 2006 and January of 2009 were compared with a similar set of patients operated on before the introduction of the implantable Doppler system over an equal time span monitored with conventional methods. Data were extracted from the medical files of the patients. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the outcome of the revision. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 327 flaps were monitored with the implantable Doppler system, of which 35 needed revision. In the control group, 303 flaps were included, of which 40 needed revision. The revision was successful in 69 percent of the cases in the implantable Doppler system group; in the group monitored by only conventional methods, this rate was 60 percent. Univariate analysis showed no statistical difference between these success rates (p = 0.441; odds ratio, 1.455; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.560 to 3.775). Multivariate analysis did not show a statistical difference either (p = 0.799; odds ratio, 1.143; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.410 to 3.182). CONCLUSION: The introduction of the implantable Doppler system did not lead to a significant increase in the salvage rate of revised flaps.

Aesthetic refinements and reoperative procedures following 370 consecutive DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstructions: important considerations for patient consent.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction often requires multiple operations. In addition to potential complications requiring reoperation, additional procedures are frequently essential in order to complete the reconstructive process, with aesthetic outcome and breast symmetry shown to be the most important factors in patient satisfaction. Despite the importance of these reoperations in decision-making and the consent process, a thorough review of the need for such operations has not been definitively explored. METHODS: A review of 370 consecutive autologous breast reconstructions (326 patients) was undertaken, comprising 365 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps and 5 superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. The need for additional procedures for either complications or aesthetic refinement following initial breast reconstruction was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, there was an average of 1.06 additional interventions for every patient carried out after primary reconstructive surgery. Of 326 patients, 46 underwent early postoperative operations for surgical complications (0.17 additional operations per patient as a consequence of complications). Procedures for aesthetic refinement included those performed on the reconstructed breast, contralateral breast, or abdominal donor site. Procedures for aesthetic refinement included nipple reconstruction, nipple-areola complex tattooing, dog-ear correction, liposuction, lipofilling, scar revision, mastopexy, and reduction mammaplasty. CONCLUSION: While DIEP flap surgery for breast reconstruction provides favorable results, patients frequently require additional procedures to improve aesthetic outcomes. The need for reoperation is an important part of the consent process prior to reconstructive surgery, and patients should recognize the likelihood of at least one additional procedure following initial reconstruction.

Measuring the pressure in the superficial inferior epigastric vein to monitor for venous congestion in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator breast reconstructions: a pilot study.

During deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap dissection, we noted that in many cases the superficial vein on the ipsilateral side of the flap was engorged and tense, and in others, it was empty. This led us to believe that the pressure is increased as the result of preferential outflow through the superficial vein in some cases, which could result in venous congestion of the flap if this vessel was not anastomosed. To test this hypothesis, we measured the venous pressure in the superficial venous system before and after flap dissection. The pressure in the superficial inferior epigastic vein of a DIEP flap was measured in 26 consecutive flaps to investigate the correlation between the pressure and venous congestion of the flap. The first measurement was performed at the beginning of the dissection, and the second measurement was taken after the flap had been completely raised on a single perforator. The mean increase in pressure after flap dissection was 10.6 mm Hg (mu = 10.6; range -1 to 31; O +/- 7.0 mm Hg). Clinical signs of venous congestion were observed in one case. In this case, the increase in venous pressure was with 31 mm Hg, also the highest. Although the results of this report are preliminary, they indicate that the pressure in the superficial vein of DIEP flaps might be of predictive value for venous congestion.

Patients with sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery do not improve their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: Sternal wound infection after cardiac operations leave physical, cosmetic and mental scar i.e. low quality of life (QoL). To better understand and evaluate health related to QoL we used SF-36 and also analysed if there were any different outcome in SWI subgroups due to different surgical techniques. DESIGN: Between January 1, 1998 and June 30, 2002 a total of 97 patients developed SWI at our department. The patients were followed up in terms of survival by computerised linkage to a continuously updated population register. On January 1, 2003, 84 patients could be identified as being alive and constituted the study group (SWI group) and compared with 42 patients prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and evaluated one year postoperative (CABG group), and matched for time of the operation, age and sex. RESULTS: The median follow-up time after cardiac surgery was 20 months (range 7-40). Late mortality was 13.4% (13/97 patients) with the median time of 5 months (range 0.5-26) postoperative. The response rate was 86.9% and SF-36 showed that SWI patients deviated significantly from the normative data for the general Swedish population. QoL for the SWI patients was comparable to QoL assessed prior to cardiac surgery i.e. the CABG group. The different surgical techniques used were comparable as they did not affect the outcome of QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that if the patients survive, SWI is a very serious complication concerning QoL. At follow up the SWI patients did not improve their QoL, with no difference in surgical technique used, although they had undergone open heart surgery.

Preoperative CT angiography reduces surgery time in perforator flap reconstruction.

UNLABELLED: The use of perforator flaps in breast reconstructions has increased considerably in the past decade. A disadvantage of the perforator flap is difficult dissection, which results in a longer procedure. During spring 2006, we introduced CT angiography (CTA) as part of the diagnostic work-up in perforator flap reconstructions to visualise each perforator more accurately. The main objectives were to reduce surgery time and the number of complications. A chart review was conducted 1 year after CTA introduction to investigate if these objectives were met. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap who underwent preoperative analysis through CTA were retrospectively evaluated. The population

Early reintervention of compromised free flaps improves success rate.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: To develop a protocolized monitor schedule in microvascular free flap reconstruction, we investigated a possible correlation between the outcome and the interval between clamp release and start of revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the charts of patients treated between 2000 and 2006 with a free flap were evaluated. The patients who underwent a flap revision were further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 608 free flaps were evaluated; 69 of these flaps were revised. Most vascular complications took place within the first 24 h; the latest complication was observed 8 days after surgery. After 6 days post surgery, the number of revisions decreased considerably. With regard to the salvaged flaps the mean time to start the revision was 46.5 h (SD 39). With regard to the failed revisions, the mean time to start the revision was 82.0 h (SD 47). This difference proved significant (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our data shows that the majority of anastomotic failures occur within the first 24 h. Thereafter, the frequency of failures decreases. We also found that the time between initial reconstruction and start of the salvage procedure influences the outcome of the revision negatively.

Autobiographical memories in patients treated for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown that several clinical groups have difficulties with generating specific autobiographical memories. The aim of this study was to investigate autobiographical memory function in women who had been treated for breast cancer and to compare those patients who had undergone mastectomy only with those who had undergone breast reconstruction surgery after mastectomy. METHOD: A sample of 26 women treated for breast cancer were tested via telephone using the Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT). RESULTS: Breast cancer patients had difficulty retrieving specific autobiographical memories compared to a group of age-matched controls without any history of breast cancer. There were essentially no differences between the two patient groups. CONCLUSION: Since breast cancer patients are vulnerable to emotional distress, autobiographical memory deficits should be investigated further.