Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 57(2): 151-156, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30685182

ABSTRACT

We deal regularly with patients who present with severe atrophy of the jaws, compromised soft tissue, or penetrating defects of the alveolar ridge that are not the result of malignant disease. For these patients we use microvascular bony flaps together with dental implants and implant-supported prostheses. The purpose of this retrospective study was to present our current management and the lessons we have learned over a 16-year period while treating 86 patients for these indications with 87 microvascular bone flaps. We used a transoral approach for the anastomosis in 60 flaps, thereby avoiding visible scars, and inserted 281 dental implants to support fixed or removable dental prostheses. Two femoral flaps developed partial necrosis, and seven implants were lost. Eighty-five of the 86 patients were satisfied with the improvement in their orofacial function and aesthetics. Poor oral hygiene, active osteomyelitis, and severe bruxism are absolute contraindications.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Process , Dental Implants , Alveolar Bone Loss , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Atrophy , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 27(7): 1397-401, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22177795

ABSTRACT

We observed 44 patients with 2-stage revisions for septic hip prostheses. We used a uniform protocol consisting of the implantation of a preformed spacer (interval 12-26 weeks), specific systemic antibiotic therapies, and cementless total hip arthroplasty at time of reimplantation. The minimum follow-up was 36 months (mean, 67 months; range, 36-120 months). During the spacer period, we observed 4 dislocations and 2 fractures leading to a resection arthroplasty interval before reimplantation in 5 cases. In one patient, reinfection was diagnosed 12 months after reimplantation. The Harris hip score increased from a preoperative mean of 39 to 90 at a mean follow-up of 67 months after reimplantation.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Hip Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Dislocation/epidemiology , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Periprosthetic Fractures/epidemiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Radiography , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...