Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Clin Transl Res ; 9(2): 115-122, 2023 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37179792

ABSTRACT

Background: To address the high prevalence of health disparities and lack of research opportunities among rural and minority communities, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) developed the Rural Research Network in January 2020. Aim: The aim of this report is to describe our process and progress in developing a rural research network. The Rural Research Network provides a platform to expand research participation opportunities to rural Arkansans, many of whom are older adults, low-income individuals, and underrepresented minority populations. Methods: The Rural Research Network leverages existing UAMS Regional Programs family medicine residency clinics within an academic medical center. Results: Since the inception of the Rural Research Network, research infrastructure and processes have been built within the regional sites. Twelve diverse studies have been implemented with recruitment and data collection from 9248 participants, and 32 manuscripts have been published with residents and faculty from the regional sites. Most studies were able to recruit Black/African American participants at or above a representative sample. Conclusions: As the Rural Research Network matures, the types of research will expand in parallel with the health priorities of Arkansas. Relevance to Patients: The Rural Research Network demonstrates how Cancer Institutes and sites funded by a Clinical and Translational Science Award can collaborate to expand research capacity and increase opportunities for research among rural and minority communities.

3.
J Dent Educ ; 77(12): 1662-9, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24319138

ABSTRACT

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a person-centered, goal-directed method of communication for eliciting and strengthening intrinsic motivation for behavior change. Originally developed in the field of addiction therapy, MI has been increasing applied in the health professions with a growing body of successful outcomes for tobacco cessation and diabetic control, which can significantly impact oral health. MI has shown preliminary value for impacting oral behaviors that reduce early childhood caries, plaque, and gingival inflammation. While the training in and use of MI by oral health providers is emerging, full integration into dental and dental hygiene curricula has yet to be explored. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to evaluate the full implementation of MI in the classroom and clinic of a dental hygiene curriculum.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Dental Hygienists/education , Interviews as Topic , Motivational Interviewing , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Cohort Studies , Communication , Faculty , Feasibility Studies , Feedback , Health Behavior , Humans , Oral Health , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Participation , Professional-Patient Relations , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Students/psychology , Teaching/methods
4.
BMC Public Health ; 12: 456, 2012 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22713093

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the current Clinical Practice Guideline recommend Motivational Interviewing for use with smokers not ready to quit, the strength of evidence for its use is rated as not optimal. The purpose of the present study is to address key methodological limitations of previous studies by ensuring fidelity in the delivery of the Motivational Interviewing intervention, using an attention-matched control condition, and focusing on unmotivated smokers whom meta-analyses have indicated may benefit most from Motivational Interviewing. It is hypothesized that MI will be more effective at inducing quit attempts and smoking cessation at 6-month follow-up than brief advice to quit and an intensity-matched health education condition. METHODS/DESIGN: A sample of adult community resident smokers (N = 255) who report low motivation and readiness to quit are being randomized using a 2:2:1 treatment allocation to Motivational Interviewing, Health Education, or Brief Advice. Over 6 months, participants in Motivational Interviewing and Health Education receive 4 individual counseling sessions and participants in Brief Advice receive one brief in-person individual session at baseline. Rigorous monitoring and independent verification of fidelity will assure the counseling approaches are distinct and delivered as planned. Participants complete surveys at baseline, week 12 and 6-month follow-up to assess demographics, smoking characteristics, and smoking outcomes. Participants who decide to quit are provided with a self-help guide to quitting, help with a quit plan, and free pharmacotherapy. The primary outcome is self-report of one or more quit attempts lasting at least 24 hours between randomization and 6-month follow-up. The secondary outcome is biochemically confirmed 7-day point prevalence cessation at 6-month follow-up. Hypothesized mediators of the presumed treatment effect on quit attempts are greater perceived autonomy support and autonomous motivation. Use of pharmacotherapy is a hypothesized mediator of Motivational Interviewing's effect on cessation. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide the most rigorous evaluation to date of Motivational Interviewing's efficacy for encouraging unmotivated smokers to make a quit attempt. It will also provide effect-size estimates of MI's impact on smoking cessation to inform future clinical trials and inform the Clinical Practice Guideline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01188018.


Subject(s)
Motivational Interviewing , Smoking Cessation/methods , Adult , Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Health Education , Humans , Motivation , Motivational Interviewing/methods , Nicotinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Patient Selection , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Smoking/drug therapy , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking Prevention , Varenicline
5.
Health Commun ; 24(3): 199-209, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19415552

ABSTRACT

Disparities related to barriers to caring for HIV-positive and at-risk minorities continue to be a major public health problem. Adaptation of efficacious HIV-prevention interventions for use as health communication innovations is a promising approach for increasing minorities' utilization of HIV health and ancillary services. Role-model stories, a widely-used HIV-prevention strategy, employ culturally tailored narratives to depict experiences of an individual modeling health-risk reduction behaviors. This article describes the careful development of a contextually appropriate role model story focused on increasing minorities' engagement in HIV/AIDS health and related services. Findings from interviews with community members and focus groups with HIV-positive minorities indicated several barriers and facilitators related to engagement in HIV health care and disease management (e.g., patient-provider relationships) and guided the development of role-model story narratives.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Community Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Cultural Characteristics , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/ethnology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Consumer Health Information , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Kansas/epidemiology , Medication Adherence , Physician-Patient Relations , Risk Reduction Behavior , Self Efficacy , Social Support
6.
Public Health Rep ; 122(4): 472-81, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17639650

ABSTRACT

Modified directly observed therapy (mDOT), in which a portion of total doses of a medication regime is ingested under supervision, has demonstrated efficacy as an intervention to assist patients in maintaining adherence to complicated antiretroviral therapy (ART). Although findings are favorable, existing efficacy studies fail to provide sufficient detail to guide others who wish to implement mDOT interventions. The aim of this article is to provide a primer for practitioners and researchers who wish to implement mDOT interventions. Drawing on the experience of 10 federally funded research projects, we provide guidance on critical questions for program implementation, including: who should be targeted, length/duration/content/location/tapering of sessions, staffing, incentives, and approaches to data collection. In addition, guidance on staff training and minimum requirements for mDOT interventions is offered along with real-world examples of mDOT interventions. mDOT is feasible and easily adapted to many settings and target populations. Interventions should match the specific needs of the target population and setting and be flexible in terms of design and delivery. mDOT should be considered among the spectrum of adherence interventions.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Directly Observed Therapy/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Inservice Training
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...