Enabling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis through chest X-rays: A multi-site and multi-modality study.

PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common chronic illnesses in the world. Unfortunately, COPD is often difficult to diagnose early when interventions can alter the disease course, and it is underdiagnosed or only diagnosed too late for effective treatment. Currently, spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing COPD but it can be challenging to obtain, especially in resource-poor countries. Chest X-rays (CXRs), however, are readily available and may have the potential as a screening tool to identify patients with COPD who should undergo further testing or intervention. In this study, we used three CXR datasets alongside their respective electronic health records (EHR) to develop and externally validate our models. METHOD: To leverage the performance of convolutional neural network models, we proposed two fusion schemes: (1) model-level fusion, using Bootstrap aggregating to aggregate predictions from two models, (2) data-level fusion, using CXR image data from different institutions or multi-modal data, CXR image data, and EHR data for model training. Fairness analysis was then performed to evaluate the models across different demographic groups. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that DL models can detect COPD using CXRs with an area under the curve of over 0.75, which could facilitate patient screening for COPD, especially in low-resource regions where CXRs are more accessible than spirometry. CONCLUSIONS: By using a ubiquitous test, future research could build on this work to detect COPD in patients early who would not otherwise have been diagnosed or treated, altering the course of this highly morbid disease.

Influenza vaccination in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases: A survey of current practices and perceptions.

INTRODUCTION: Recommendations for receiving the influenza vaccination in patients with autoimmune neuromuscular disorders, such as myasthenia gravis (MG), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), or Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), may vary among neurology practitioners. This survey examined the current practices and perceptions of neurologists regarding the influenza vaccination in these patients. METHODS: We performed an Internet-based survey among neurologists across the United States through online forums for neurologists. RESULTS: Across practice settings, 184 neurologists followed 6465 MG, 2313 CIDP, and 1907 GBS patients. Among the respondents, 82.6%, 58.8%, and 42.3% reported that they recommend the influenza vaccine for all patients with MG, CIDP, and GBS, respectively. Respondents practicing for more than 10 y were more conservative in recommending the influenza vaccine for all patients with MG. A history of exacerbation following the influenza vaccine was regarded as the most important factor influencing vaccine recommendation for MG and CIDP. DISCUSSION: Influenza vaccination recommendation practices varied between surveyed neurologists, despite existing guidelines. Clearer professional society recommendations and education are an unmet need based on this apparent knowledge gap.

Differential response to rituximab in anti-AChR and anti-MuSK positive myasthenia gravis patients: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: B-cell targeted therapy with rituximab has shown durable response in treating refractory myasthenia gravis (MG). This study compares the response to rituximab between patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody positive (AChR+) and muscle-specific kinase autoantibody positive (MuSK+) MG. METHODS: This retrospective study included 33 patients with either AChR+ or MuSK+ MG who were treated with rituximab from 05/31/2003 to 05/31/2017. Pretreatment and post-treatment immunotherapy regimens, clinical symptoms, and examination findings were evaluated. RESULTS: Median MGFA Class of II at baseline improved to an asymptomatic median classification at 12-months and last follow-up (p-values <.001) post-rituximab. Improvement in MGFA class was not significantly different between the groups. Twenty-one patients achieved clinical remission (12/17 AChR+, 9/16 MuSK+) with time to remission of 441.4 ± 336.6 days for AChR+ versus 230 ± 180.8 days for MuSK+ patients (p-value 0.049). The mean prednisone dosage requirement decreased significantly in both groups post-rituximab. AChR+ patients required more hospitalizations for exacerbation post-rituximab (p-value 0.046). CONCLUSION: Rituximab treatment response is observed in both AChR+ and MuSK+ patients supporting the role of B cell depletion in the management of MG. While there was no significant difference between these groups in terms of clinical improvement, symptom-free state, and prednisone burden, MuSK+ MG patients may experience greater benefits, including earlier time to remission, fewer exacerbations and hospitalizations post-treatment.

Liver resection and ablation for metastatic melanoma: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: The median survival for patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma is usually limited to approximately 1 year. In the case of liver metastasis, resection and ablation can achieve long-term survival. This study aimed to describe the outcomes after liver resection or ablation for metastatic melanoma to the liver and identify preoperative prognostic factors. METHODS: Forty eight patients who underwent liver resection (n = 32) or percutaneous ablation (n = 16) were identified from the 1,523 patients with melanoma liver metastases evaluated between January1993 and January 2013. RESULTS: Median OS was 25.9 months. Median OS was not different after ablation (18 months) and resection (26 months; P > 0.2). Patients in the ablation group more often presented with extrahepatic disease (EHD) (P = 0.008) and received more frequently systemic therapy before ablation (P = 0.005). Patients without EHD tended to have longer OS (26.5 vs. 12 months; P = 0.076) and PFS (13 vs. 5 months; P = 0.11) in the whole cohort. EHD was significantly associated with a worse OS in the resection group (P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Liver resection is associated to prolonged survival over 24 months and should be considered only in selected patients with metastatic disease confined to the liver. In patients not candidate for surgery, tumor ablation can be considered.

Hepatic artery embolization for liver metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor following imatinib and sunitinib therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of hepatic artery embolization (HAE) as a therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in patients who are refractory to imatinib and sunitinib. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review revealed 11 patients with GIST metastatic to the liver who underwent 15 HAEs between February 2002 and May 2013. These patients were stratified into two groups according to the previous treatment: (a) those treated with HAE as second-line treatment after failing first-line imatinib (n = 3) and (b) those treated with HAE as third-line therapy after failing first-line imatinib and second-line sunitinib (n = 8). Initial therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Initial therapeutic response rates at 3 months after HAE were 27.3 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 6.0-61.0 %) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.0 and 45.5 % (95 % CI, 16.7-76.6 %) by modified RECIST (mRECIST). The median OS and PFS after HAE were 14.9 and 3.9 months in group A and 23.8 and 3.4 months in group B, respectively. No procedure-related mortality or major complication was observed. CONCLUSIONS: HAE is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for GIST liver metastases. Although larger studies are necessary, HAE should be considered as an alternative or adjuvant to third-line or even second-line systemic treatment.