Learning curve in robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) ventral hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

PURPOSE: rTAPP-VHR is a novel technique which may be added to a surgeon's armamentarium. We aim to evaluate the robotic transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (rTAPP-VHR) learning curve based on operative times while accounting for peritoneal flap integrity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a database collected over a 7-year period. Patients with primary ventral hernias were included and a cumulative sum analysis(CUSUM) was used to create learning curves for three subsets of operative times. A risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) accounted for repair quality based on peritoneal flap completeness. The flap was considered as incomplete when peritoneal gaps were unable to be closed. RESULTS: 105 patients undergoing rTAPP-VHR were included. Learning curves were created for skin-to-skin, console, and off-console times. Patients were divided into three phases. In terms of skin-to-skin times, both phase 2&3 had a mean 11 min shorter than that of phase 1 (p = 0.0498, p = 0.0245, respectively), with a steady decrease after forty-six cases. An incomplete peritoneal flap was noted in 25/36 patients in phase 1, as compared to 5/24 and 5/45 patients in phase 2&3, respectively. When risk-adjusted for peritoneal flap completeness, gradually decreasing skin-to-skin times were observed after sixty-one cases. In terms of off-console times, the mean across three phases was 14 min, with marked improvement after forty-three cases. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-six cases were needed to achieve steadily decreasing operative times. We can assume that ensuring good-quality repairs, through maintenance of peritoneal flap integrity, was gradually improved after sixty-one cases. Moreover, familiarization with port placements and robotic docking was accomplished after forty-three cases.

Laparoscopic repair of acute surgical diseases in the 21st century.

Laparoscopic surgery has an increasing use in today's world of general surgery, especially in the treatment of diseases such as acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, diverticulitis, lysis of adhesions in the setting of small bowel obstruction, incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia, and perforated peptic ulcer disease. The aim of this paper is to discuss the diagnosis and management of each disease while placing emphasis on the role of laparoscopy in its treatment.

Severely disordered esophageal peristalsis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the preferred operation for the control of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The use of a full fundoplication for patients with esophageal dysmotility is controversial. Although LNF is known to be superior to a partial wrap for patients with weak peristalsis, its efficacy for patients with severe dysmotility is unknown. We hypothesized that LNF is also acceptable for patients with severe esophageal dysmotility. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review of consecutive patients with severe esophageal dysmotility who underwent an LNF was performed. Severe dysmotility was defined by manometry showing an esophageal amplitude of 30 mmHg or less and/or 70% or more nonperistaltic esophageal body contractions. RESULTS: In this study, 48 patients with severe esophageal dysmotility underwent LNF. All the patients presented with symptoms of GERD, and 19 (39%) had preoperative dysphagia. A total of 10 patients had impaired esophageal body contractions, whereas 32 patients had an abnormal esophageal amplitude, and 6 patients had both. The average abnormal esophageal amplitude was 24.9 +/- 5.2 mmHg (range, 6.0-30 mmHg). The mean percentage of nonperistaltic esophageal body contractions was 79.4% +/- 8.3% (range, 70-100%). There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions. Postoperatively, early dysphagia occurred in 35 patients (73%). Five patients were treated with esophageal dilation, which was successful in three cases. One patient required a reoperative fundoplication. Overall, persistent dysphagia was found in two patients (4.2%), including one patient with severe preoperative dysphagia, which improved postoperatively. Abnormal peristalsis and/or distal amplitude improved postoperatively in 12 (80%) of retested patients. There were no cases of Barrett's progression to dysplasia or carcinoma. During an average follow-up period of 25.4 months (range, 1-46 months), eight patients (16%) were receiving antireflux medications, with six of these showing normal esophageal pH study results. CONCLUSION: The LNF procedure provides low rates of reflux recurrence with little long-term postoperative dysphagia experienced by patients with severely disordered esophageal peristalsis. Effective fundoplication improved esophageal motility for most of the patients. A 360 degrees fundoplication should not be contraindicated for patients with severe esophageal dysmotility.

Molecular, forensic and haplotypic inconsistencies regarding the identity of the Ekaterinburg remains.

BACKGROUND: A set of human remains unearthed near Ekaterinburg, Russia has been attributed to the Romanov Imperial Family of Russia and their physician and servants. That conclusion was officially accepted by the Russian government following publication of DNA tests that were widely publicized. The published study included no discussion of major forensic discrepancies and the information regarding the burial site and remains included irregularities. Furthermore, its conclusion of Romanov identity was based on molecular behaviour that indicates contamination rather than endogenous DNA. The published claim to have amplified by PCR a 1223 bp region of degraded DNA in a single segment for nine individuals and then to have obtained sequence of PCR products derived from that segment without cloning indicates that the Ekaterinburg samples were contaminated with non-degraded, high molecular weight, 'fresh' DNA. AIM: Noting major violations of standard forensic practices, factual inconsistencies, and molecular behaviours that invalidate the claimed identity, we attempted to replicate the findings of the original DNA study. SUBJECT: We analysed mtDNA extracted from a sample of the relic of Grand Duchess Elisabeth, sister of Empress Alexandra. RESULTS: Among clones of multiple PCR targets and products, we observed no complete mtDNA haplotype matching that reported for Alexandra. The consensus haplotype of Elisabeth differs from that reported for Alexandra at four sites. CONCLUSION: Considering molecular and forensic inconsistencies, the identity of the Ekaterinburg remains has not been established. Our mtDNA haplotype results for Elisabeth provide yet another line of conflicting evidence regarding the identity of the Ekaterinburg remains.

Use of a laparoscopic hand-assist device for accessory splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The use of a laparoscopic hand-assist device may aid in the identification of accessory spleens (ASs) and provide similar benefits to a conventional laparoscopic procedure. A patient with previous splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic pupusa (ITP) and recurrent thrombocytopenia is reported. METHOD: A computed tomography scan and RBC scan identified several nodules consistent with ASs. Initial laparoscopic exploration could not identify all the ASs seen on preoperative imaging. A hand-assist device was placed and a total of five nodules of splenic tissue were identified without conversion to laparotomy. RESULTS: The patient had a brief and uncomplicated postoperative course with a return of platelet counts to 350,000 at 1-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: We propose that in the scenario of recurrent ITP following laparoscopic splenectomy, repeat laparoscopy is the first step once an AS is identified by preoperative imaging. If the AS is not identified at laparoscopy, the insertion of a hand-assist device is an alternative to a full laparotomy.

The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery.

The trauma of surgery evokes a variety of physiologic and immunologic alterations that should contribute to host defense. However, an exaggerated response to injury may result in immunosuppression and lead to significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic surgery may result in less induced surgical trauma than conventional open surgery. Decreased postoperative pain and speedy functional recovery of laparoscopic patients may be attributable to the reduced inflammatory response and minimal immunosuppression. Inflammation, an early protective homeostatic immune response to injury, is characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines and by activation of cellular and humoral immune mechanisms. Postoperative levels of the inflammatory cytokines have been consistently lower after laparoscopic procedures, indicating a smaller degree of surgical insult and acute inflammatory reaction. Surgical stress derails the functions of both polymorphonuclear and mononuclear cells, which may lead to an increased risk of postoperative infection. Comparative studies of cellular immunity after laparoscopic and conventional surgery demonstrate immunologic advantage conferred by laparoscopy. Exaggerated activation of peritoneal immunity may lead to a relative local immunosuppression, resulting in ineffective intraperitoneal bacterial clearance and serious postoperative infections. Functions of the peritoneal macrophages are better preserved when laparotomy is avoided. Decreased perioperative stress may be particularly important for oncologic patients. Laparoscopic approaches may result in diminished perioperative tumor dissemination and better cancer outcomes. Although laparoscopy is "minimally invasive," systemic immune responses still are undeniably activated. However, laparoscopic surgery appears to induce a smaller injury, resulting in proportionally decreased immunologic changes. In addition to improved cosmesis and faster functional recovery, a patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery may benefit most from a net immunologic advantage.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in the setting of splenomegaly.

BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) devices may be well suited to splenectomy in cases of splenomegaly. METHODS: All cases of HALS for splenectomy between 1997 and 2001 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, operative details, and morbidity and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: HALS for splenectomy was performed in 54 patients. A total of 39 patients with massive splenomegaly (MS) (>600 g) were identified. The average weight of the MS group was 1285 +/- 505 g. There was one (3%) conversion. Operative time was 159 +/- 65 min, estimated blood loss was 257 +/- 240 ml, and length of hospital stay was 5.4 +/- 2.9 days. Morbidity was limited to 13 patients (24%), and there were two postoperative mortalities (5.1%). CONCLUSIONS: HALS for splenectomy in the setting of splenomegaly is feasible and safe. For the surgeon considering a laparoscopic approach in the setting of splenomegaly, a hand-assisted technique is ideally suited for removal of the enlarged spleen.

Elevated intrahepatic pressures and decreased hepatic tissue blood flow prevent gas embolus during limited laparoscopic liver resections.

BACKGROUND: As new techniques are emerging for laparoscopic liver resections, concerns have been raised about the development of gas embolus related to the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum. We hypothesized that elevated intrahepatic vascular pressures and decreased hepatic tissue blood flow (LQB) would prevent gas embolus during laparoscopic liver resections under conventional pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Intrahepatic vascular pressures and LQB were measured in nine pigs with varying CO(2) pneumoperitoneum. Gas embolus was determined after hepatic incision by monitoring pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), hepatic venous PCO(2), systemic blood pressure (SBP), and suprahepatic vena cava ultrasound. RESULTS: As the pneumoperitoneum was increased from 0 to 15 mmHg, intrahepatic vascular pressures increased significantly (p < 0.05), while LQB decreased significantly (p < 0.05). A 2.0-cm hepatic incision at 4, 8, 15, and 20mmHg produced no ultrasound evidence of gas embolus and no changes in PAP, SBP, or hepatic venous PCO(2) (p = NS). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the risk of significant embolus under conventional pneumoperitoneum is minimal during laparoscopic liver resections.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes warm ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: Traditional open donor nephrectomy is associated with good donor outcomes and excellent allograft function. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may accomplish these same goals with less morbidity. We report our initial experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy using a commercially available hand-assist device. METHODS: Donor and allograft outcomes for the first 30 patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in our institution were prospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was successfully completed in 29 (97%) of 30 donors. Organ dissection was carried out purely laparoscopically. Vessel division and allograft extraction were performed using a hand-assisted technique. The average operative time was 275 minutes (range 193 to 360), with an estimated blood loss of 99 mL (range 50 to 300). Pneumoperitoneum was consistently maintained during the hand-assisted portion of the procedure. The mean warm ischemic time was 72.5 seconds (range 30 to 165). On average, the regular diet was resumed after 2.2 days (range 1 to 3), and patients were discharged home 3.4 days (range 2 to 5) after surgery. Eight minor complications occurred in the donor group. Immediate graft function occurred in all 30 cases. No ureteral complications occurred. The recipient creatinine levels ranged from 0.6 to 2.4 mg/dL at an average follow-up of 11.5 months (range 1 to 23). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is technically feasible and can be performed with minimal morbidity. Hand-assisted kidney extraction may help to facilitate immediate allograft function by minimizing the warm ischemic time.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the United States: an overview.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was developed to bridge the gap between open surgery and advanced laparoscopic surgery. Advantages of the hand in the abdomen include tactile feedback, the ability to palpate, blunt dissection, organ retraction, control of bleeding, and rapid organ removal. There are 3 commercially available devices in the United States, as well as a fourth in Europe and a fifth in Japan. Uses for HALS include procedures requiring intact specimen removal, complex laparoscopic procedures, preventing open conversion, and overcoming a technical obstacle. HALS procedures, such as esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, splenectomy, bariatric surgery, colectomy, nephrectomy, hysterectomy, and aortobifemoral bypass, have all been reported in the literature. Improvement in instrumentation, specifically with newer generation devices, will allow HALS to become more popular. We advocate the use of HALS specifically for laparoscopic colectomy, laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly, and for living-related donor nephrectomy.

Suturing and knotting techniques for thoracoscopic cardiac surgery.

The preceding description of E-CABG may seem excessively detailed, even redundant, for trained cardiac surgeons; however, the authors' extensive experience with training surgeons on endoscopic techniques suggests that, despite a high level of proficiency and dexterity that a surgeon may possess in open surgery, becoming equally proficient and dexterous in the endoscopic environment is not simple. Participating in an in-depth, systematic endoscopic microvascular surgery training program in a laboratory setting is essential before applying the previously described E-CABG techniques in humans. The E-CABG procedure is one of the most challenging endoscopic techniques. Successful completion of this procedure requires that the surgeon be motivated to succeed and willing to invest the time and effort necessary to develop the new skills. Also critical is the avoidance of the temptation to use devices and systems that promise to obviate the need to bother with learning these difficult endoscopic skills. Long term results of the minimally invasive approach remain to be defined. However, some early studies of port-access procedures are encouraging. To date, a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing conventional LAD bypass to E-CABG has not been conducted. Although most investigators believe that long term patency of the IMA to the LAD using either technique should be the same, this is as yet unproven. Nonetheless, the adaption of endoscopic skills by the cardiac surgeon will further advance the evolution of this specialty.

The feasibility and accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy in the septic ICU patient.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis of unknown origin are common complications of critically ill patients in the ICU. These patients frequently have unreliable clinical exams and are candidates for exploratory laparotomy. Although abdominal CT is commonly used because it is less invasive than laparotomy, it is often unreliable or unobtainable. Bedside laparoscopy is an alternative technique that may be more accurate than CT in selected patients and less invasive than laparotomy. METHODS: We performed diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in a series of ICU patients with SIRS/septic state of unknown origin between May 1997 and June 1998. All patients were unstable and required significant respiratory and hemodynamic support. Laparoscopy was either performed in the ICU at the patient's bedside or in the operating room. CT scan of the abdomen had been performed on most of the patients who were stable enough to transport. Confirmation of diagnosis was obtained either by laparotomy, autopsy, or clinical recovery. RESULTS: Among the 17 eligible patients, 16 underwent successful DL. Insufflation was impossible in one patient because of high intraabdominal pressure. Bedside evaluations were performed in 14 of the 17 patients. There were no complications from the laparoscopy. Six patients were identified as positive (four intestinal ischemia, two cholecystitis); the other 10 had negative explorations. Follow-up on two patients with negative laparoscopy was incomplete due to denied postmortem. Laparoscopic diagnoses were confirmed in the remaining 14 patients by laparotomy (six cases), postmortem (three cases), or recovery (five cases), with an accuracy of 100%. The overall accuracy of abdominal CT obtained in nine of the 14 patients was 33%. CONCLUSIONS: DL in a select group of critical ICU patients is safe and accurate, whereas CT scan tends to be inaccurate and is often unobtainable due to patient instability. Performing the procedure at the bedside can expedite the diagnosis, eliminate the burden for transfer, and save on anesthesia and operating room charges.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: Aortobifemoral bypass grafting is a durable operation for arterial reconstruction in patients with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease. In several small laparoscopic series technically demanding aortic operations have been described that have not gained widespread acceptance or applicability. To simplify the laparoscopic approach to the aorta, we have developed a technique of aortobifemoral bypass grafting that uses hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) to minimize the complexity of aortic dissection and reconstruction. METHODS: Five patients with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease underwent successful HALS aortobifemoral bypass grafting. With the use of a specialized sleeve device (Hand-Port), an operative hand was introduced into the laparoscopic field while pneumoperitoneum was maintained. Laparoscopic dissection of the infrarenal aorta was then performed with retraction provided by the operative hand. Proximal aortic anastomosis was performed with an open technique through the same 7.5-cm Hand-Port incision, and femoral anastomoses were performed in the standard fashion. RESULTS: Five hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass grafts were performed (two end-to-end, three end-to-side proximal anastomoses). Mean operative time was 231 minutes. Mean blood loss was 440 mL. All patients underwent extubation immediately after surgery, were ambulatory on postoperative day (POD) 1, and were tolerating their diet by POD 3. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 days. One patient was discharged on POD 5 and started a clear liquid diet after a self-limiting postoperative ileus. All patients were asymptomatic and back to full activity/work by 14.6 days postoperatively, on average (range, 11-20 days). CONCLUSION: The HALS offers the advantages of tactile feedback, flexible retraction, and the introduction of conventional surgical instruments, all of which extend laparoscopic surgery and its established benefits to a wide array of more complex surgical problems, including major vascular surgery. Ease of performance, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times all suggest that HALS may become a valuable adjunct to conventional aortobifemoral bypass grafting.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system: initial experience with 68 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery with the HandPort System, a new device. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon inserts a hand into the abdomen while pneumoperitoneum is maintained. The hand assists laparoscopic instruments and is helpful in complex laparoscopic cases. METHODS: A prospective nonrandomized study was initiated with the participation of 10 laparoscopic surgical centers. Surgeons were free to test the device in any situation where they expected a potential advantage over conventional laparoscopy. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were entered in the study. Operations included colorectal procedures (sigmoidectomy, right colectomy, resection rectopexy), splenectomy for splenomegaly, living-related donor nephrectomy, gastric banding for morbid obesity, partial gastrectomy, and various other procedures. Mean incision size for the HandPort was 7.4 cm. Most surgeons (78%) preferred to insert their nondominant hand into the abdomen. Pneumoperitoneum was generally maintained at 14 mmHg, and only one patient required conversion to open surgery as a result of an unmanageable air leak. Hand fatigue during surgery was noted in 20.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The hand-assisted technique appeared to be useful in minimally invasive colorectal surgery, splenectomy for splenomegaly, living-related donor nephrectomy, and procedures considered too complex for a laparoscopic approach. This approach provides excellent means to explore, to retract safely, and to apply immediate hemostasis when needed. Although the data presented here reflect the authors' initial experience, they compare favorably with series of similar procedures performed purely laparoscopically.

Transperitoneal laparoscopic exposure for lumbar interbody fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective clinical trial of the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach to the lumbar spine in a consecutive series of patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion. OBJECTIVES: To determine safety and effectiveness, and to document technique and perioperative complications of a laparoscopic exposure for lumbar interbody fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the widespread adoption of laparoscopic techniques, the benefits of minimal access surgery are now well recognized--in general, gynecologic and urologic surgery. Only recently have minimal access techniques been applied to spinal procedures. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic exposure of the lumbar spine to facilitate implantation of cylindrical threaded interbody fusion cages. These patients were prospectively followed and all perioperative considerations and complications were documented and analyzed. The surgical technique of laparoscopic exposure will be described. RESULTS: The laparoscopic approach was attempted in 47 consecutive patients. Forty-four were completed laparoscopically--36 single level fusions, seven two level fusions, and one three level fusion. Early in the series, conversion to open surgery was required in one patient (case #3) because of bleeding from the presacral veins which hindered the view. In one case, mobilization of the great vessels proved to be difficult, and in one other case the patient could not tolerate abdominal insufflation. The mean blood loss for the entire group was 105 mls. Complications related to the endoscopic exposure were few. There were no injuries to major vascular structures or to bowel, and no mortalities. In two patients, the cages were malpositioned necessitating repeat endoscopic exposure for cage realignment. One patient required a laparotomy for a postoperative small bowel obstruction. The median postoperative stay was 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: Transperitoneal laparoscopic exposure for single or multiple level, anterior lumbar interbody fusion can be performed with low risk. Experience in open anterior spinal surgery and laparoscopic general surgery is vital in minimizing the risks.

Hand-Assisted laparoscopic Surgery.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been sporadically described in the past to assist the surgeon during operations of complexity or when operations require specimen removal. The hand will offer the surgeon an advantage in terms of tactile feedback, exposure, retraction, or orientation so that it will enable him or her to operate with greater safety and efficiency. The fundamental pre-requisite for successful HALS is a reliable hand-assist device. We perform HALS for complex advanced laparoscopic surgery where it may save time, increase accuracy and improve safety. Additionally, this approach is considered for any operation that requires specimen removal, since an enlarged incision may be required. Early introduction of the hand may facilitate dissection and specimen removal.

New device for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic surgery has undergone a rapid evolution since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy of Erich Mühe in 1985. Many surgeons felt that further technological success would be related not only to increasing experience and skill of surgeons, but also technological advances which would enable surgeons to perform increasingly more difficult and complex tasks. Progress has been rapid for some, but broad acceptance by surgeons has been slow.

A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if any significant differences exist between laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA). DESIGN: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LA to OA. DATA SOURCES: An extensive literature search was conducted for appropriate articles published between January 1990 and March 1997. Articles were initially retrieved through MEDLINE with MeSH terms "appendicitis" or "appendectomy" and "laparoscopy". Additional methods included cross-referencing bibliographics of retrieved articles, hand searching abstracts from relevant meetings and consultation with a content expert. STUDY SELECTION: Only RCTs published in English in which patients had a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The outcomes of interest included operating time, hospital stay, readmission rates, return to normal activity and complications. The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager 3.0 was used to calculate odds ratios (OR), weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The random-effects model was used for statistical analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twelve trials met the inclusion criteria. Because there were insufficient data in some trials, operating time, hospitalization and return to work were assessed in only 8 trials. Mean operating time was significantly longer with LA (WMD 18.10 minutes, 95% CI 12.87 to 23.15 minutes). There were fewer wound infections in LA (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.69), but no significant differences in intra-abdominal abscess rates (OR 1.94, 95% CI 0.68 to 5.58). There was no significant difference in the mean length of hospital stay (WMD -0.16 days, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.15 days) or readmission rates (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.48). However, the return to normal activity was significantly earlier with LA (WMD -5.79 days, 95% CI -7.38 to -4.21 days). Sensitivity analyses did not affect the results. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that operating room time is significantly longer, hospital stay is unchanged but return to normal activities is significantly earlier with LA.

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a safe procedure.

Acute cholecystitis is increasingly managed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Some reports have shown conversion and complication rates that are increased in comparison to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study reviews the combined experience of two hospitals where the intention was to perform early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. A total of 152 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (evidence of acute inflammation clinically and pathologically) were identified. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 14 cases (9%) in the total series. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed within 2 days of admission in 76% (115 of 152) of patients. Conversion was significantly less likely in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 2 days of admission (4 of 115) compared to those undergoing surgery beyond 2 days (10 of 37; P<0.0001). Eleven patients (7%) had postoperative complications; however, there were no cases of injury to the biliary system and no perioperative deaths. This series shows that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in patients with acute cholecystitis and suggests that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is preferable to delaying surgery. Although the conversion rate to open surgery is higher than for elective cholecystectomy, the majority of patients (91%) still derive the well-recognized benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an acceptable approach to acute cholecystitis for the experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy in the porcine model: our initial experience with a new hand-assist device.

Many advanced laparoscopic cases remain technically difficult and are less widely accepted. To a great extent, advanced laparoscopic surgery is handicapped by the loss of a surgeon's tactile sense. The concept of introducing the surgeon's hand as an aid to minimally invasive surgery has been described. We report a new hand-assist device designed to allow the introduction of the surgeon's hand, wrist, and forearm through a small incision in the abdomen to assist laparoscopic surgery with pneumoperitoneum. Important factors in the hand-assist design are ease of use, reliable maintenance of pneumoperitoneum, and minimal hand/arm fatigue, which were met with this device.