Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 193: 113731, 2021 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197833

ABSTRACT

Cloperastine hydrochloride, a piperidine derivative, is a drug substance with a central antitussive effect and widely used in cough treatment; and its impurities have not been reported. Herein we isolated and identified five impurities (named as impurity A, B, C, D and E) in cloperastine hydrochloride bulk drug and developed a quantitative HPLC method. First, impurity A, B, C were enriched by ODS column chromatography and isolated by semi-preparative HPLC, at the same time, impurity D was purified by ODS column chromatography. Then, impurity E was enriched by strong acid degradation and purified by semi-preparative HPLC. At last, their structures were characterized by a variety of spectral data (MS, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HSQC, HMBC and 1H-1H COSY). Impurity A was confirmed as 1-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]piperidine, which having one less chloro-substituent compared with cloperastine. Impurity B was confirmed as 1-[2-[(2-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl]piperidine, which was the isomer of cloperastine with 2-chloro-substituent. Impurity C was confirmed as 1-[2-[(3-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl]piperidine, which was the isomer of cloperastine with 3-chloro-substituent. Impurity D was confirmed as (4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanone, which was the raw material for the synthesis of cloperastine. Impurity E was confirmed as (4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol, which was an intermediate in the synthesis of cloperastine, and it was also a hydrolysate of cloperastine. Finally, the developed method was validated in terms of specificity, linearity, sensitivity, precision and accuracy.


Subject(s)
Drug Contamination , Piperidines , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22429875

ABSTRACT

A comparison of three derivatization reagents (dansyl chloride, diazomethane and p-bromophenacyl bromide) for the simultaneous quantitation of three anticancer chemicals (tegafur, 5-fluorouracil and gimeracil) and endogenous uracil in plasma using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been developed and evaluated. Through a comprehensive consideration, p-bromophenacyl bromide (p-BPB) was finally selected as the derivatization reagent. Because it essentially changed the chromatographic behavior of the aforementioned highly hydrophilic compounds and significantly enhanced their sensitivities. The method was validated over the concentration ranges of 5-5000 ng/ml for tegafur, 0.6-700 ng/ml for 5-fluorouracil, 3-700 ng/ml for gimeracil and 6-2000 ng/ml for uracil. The method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetics study of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil and uracil in cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/blood , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Pyridines/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , Uracil/blood , Acetophenones/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Dansyl Compounds/chemistry , Diazomethane/chemistry , Humans , Limit of Detection , Pyridines/chemistry , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Reproducibility of Results , Uracil/chemistry , Uracil/pharmacokinetics
3.
Yao Xue Xue Bao ; 47(10): 1363-9, 2012 Oct.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23289150

ABSTRACT

The study is to investigate the pharmacokinetics of S-1 capsule (tegafur, gimeracil and potassium oxonate capsule) in patients with advanced gastric cancer after single and multiple oral administration. Twelve patients with advanced gastric cancer were recruited to the study. The dose of S-1 for each patient was determined according to his/her body surface area (BSA). The dose for single administration was 60 mg every subject. The dose for multiple administration for one subject was as follows: 100 mg x d(-1) or 120 mg x d(-1), 28-days consecutive oral administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil, potassium oxonate and uracil after single oral administration were as follows: (2,207 +/- 545), (220.0 +/- 68.2), (374.9 +/- 103.0), (110.5 +/- 100.8) and (831.1 +/- 199.9) ng x mL(-1) for Cmax; (11.8 +/- 3.8), (4.4 +/- 3.3), (7.8 +/- 5.1), (3.1 +/- 0.9) and (8.8 +/- 4.1) h for t1/2, respectively. After six days oral administration, the average steady state plasma concentrations (Cav) of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil, potassium oxonate and uracil were (2,425 +/- 1,172), (73.88 +/- 18.88), (162.6 +/- 70.8), (36.89 +/- 29.35) and (435.3 +/- 141.0) ng x mL(-1), respectively, and the degree of fluctuation (DF) were (1.0 +/- 0.2), (2.5 +/- 0.4), (3.1 +/- 0.8), (2.4 +/- 0.8) and (1.5 +/- 0.3), respectively. The cumulative urine excretion percentage of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil and potassium oxonate in urine within 48 h were (4.2 +/- 2.8) %, (4.7 +/- 1.6) %, (18.5 +/- 6.0) % and (1.7 +/- 1.2) %, repectively, after single oral administration of S-1. The results exhibited that tegafur had some drug accumulation observed, and gimeracil, potassium oxonate, 5-fluorouracil and uracil had no drug accumulation observed.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacokinetics , Oxonic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Tegafur/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Capsules , Drug Combinations , Female , Fluorouracil/blood , Fluorouracil/urine , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Oxonic Acid/blood , Oxonic Acid/urine , Pyridines/blood , Pyridines/urine , Stomach Neoplasms/blood , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/urine , Tegafur/blood , Tegafur/urine , Uracil/blood , Uracil/urine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...