ABSTRACT
Purpose: Recent advances to preserve neurocognitive function in patients treated for brain metastases include stereotactic radiosurgery, hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and memantine administration. The hippocampus, corpus callosum, fornix, and amygdala are key neurocognitive substructures with a low propensity for brain metastases. Herein, we report our preliminary experience using a "memory-avoidance" WBRT (MA-WBRT) approach that spares these substructures for patients with >15 brain metastases. Methods and Materials: Ten consecutive patients treated with MA-WBRT on a phase 2 clinical trial were reviewed. In each patient, the hippocampi, amygdalae, corpus callosum, and fornix were contoured. Patients were not eligible for MA-WBRT if they had metastases in these substructures. A memory-avoidance region was created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around these substructures. Hotspots were avoided in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Coverage of brain metastases was prioritized over memory avoidance dose constraints. Dose constraints for these avoidance structures included a D100% ≤ 9 Gy and D0.03 cm3 ≤ 16 Gy (variation acceptable to 20 Gy). LINAC-based volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Results: On average, the memory avoidance structure volume was 37.1 cm3 (range, 25.2-44.6 cm3), occupying 2.5% of the entire whole brain target volume. All treatment plans met the D100% dose constraint, and 8 of 10 plans met the D0.03 cm3 constraint, with priority given to tumor coverage for the remaining 2 cases. Target coverage (D98% > 25 Gy) and homogeneity (D2% ≤ 37.5 Gy) were achieved for all plans. Conclusions: Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques allow for sparing of the hippocampus, amygdala, corpus callosum, and fornix with good target coverage and homogeneity. After enrollment is completed, quality of life and cognitive data will be evaluated to assess the efficacy of MA-WBRT to mitigate declines in quality of life and cognition after whole brain radiation.
ABSTRACT
Adequate dose homogeneity and full prescription dose delivery to the scalp still remains a dosimetric problem during scalp irradiation due to the anatomical shape of the cranium. Confounding variables such as gravity, the irregular and convex shape of the cranium, air gaps between scalp surface and commercial bolus, and potential inconsistencies in a 3D printed bolus can negatively impact the dose delivered to the scalp surface during scalp irradiation. The purpose of this retrospective case study was to implement the use of a 3D milled rigid bolus technique combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning and evaluate the dosimetric efficacy in delivering dose to the surface of the scalp. The 8-patient retrospective case study consisted of patients with a scalp lesion treated using a 3D milled bolus, VMAT, 6 megavoltage (MV) photon beams, and aligned for treatment using daily conebeam computed tomography (CT) and 6° of freedom couch positioning. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were used to evaluate maximum dose delivered to the planning target volumes (PTVs) while the dose homogeneity index (DHI) was calculated and compared to that of an ideal value of 1. The researchers evaluated the minimum dose delivered to the individual PTVs after plan normalization. The researchers found that the 3D milled bolus coupled with volumetric modulated arc therapy increased surface dose homogeneity, while also increasing the percentage of planning target volumes receiving full prescription dose. With statistically significant results, patient specific 3D milled rigid bolus offers a viable bolus option for treatment of superficial scalp lesions when combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning. However, a larger sample size used in a scientific research study across multiple institutions would be desirable to validate these case study findings.
