Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Aging (Albany NY) ; 13(18): 22571-22587, 2021 09 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34559067

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infection with multiple pathogens may play a key role in the pathogenesis of dementia. Whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated causally with dementia is controversial. OBJECTIVE: We conduct a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies on the association between H. pylori infection and the risk for all-cause and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases with English language restrictions from the date of conception to September 18, 2020. The primary analysis was as follows: the exposure variable was H. pylori infection, and the outcome was incident all-cause and AD dementia. Pooled odds ratios (OR), relative risk (RR), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained using the fixed-or random-effect model. Forest plots were generated to summarize the results. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 96,561 participants were included in the meta-analysis: 5 case-control studies and 5 cohort studies. The overall pooled cohort studies showed a significant positive association between H. pylori infection and all-cause dementia with pooled RR of 1.36 (95% CI, 1.11-1.67). There was no association between H. pylori infection and risk for developing AD: RR of 1.33 (95% CI, 0.86-2.05) in cohort studies, and OR of 1.72 (95% CI, 0.97-3.04) in case-control studies. Significant heterogeneity was showed in each comparison group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports a positive association between H. pylori infection and the risk of all-cause dementia, but not AD dementia. Due to the interference of confounding factors, randomized controlled trials are needed to prove their causality.


Subject(s)
Dementia/etiology , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Helicobacter pylori , Risk , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Dementia/microbiology , Humans
2.
Chin J Integr Med ; 26(8): 577-582, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761337

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cognitive impairment (CI) is gradually increasing, which has attracted more attention from medical researchers worldwide. Definitive mechanisms of pathogenesis remain elusive, and there are few medications that have been proven effective for CI. The utilization of Chinese herbal medicine has shown positive therapeutic effects for a broad spectrum of diseases, including CI. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Guilingji Capsules (GLJC, ) in treating mild-to-moderate CI with Shen (Kidney) and marrow deficiency syndrome. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, multicenter clinical trial with a noninferiority design that included 348 participants randomly divided into an experimental arm and an active comparator arm. Individuals in the experimental arm (174 cases) took 0.6 g of GLJC once a day and 19.2 mg of Gingko biloba extract mimetic 3 times a day. Individuals in the active comparator arm (174 cases) took 0.6 g of GLJC mimetic once a day and 19.2 mg of Gingko biloba extract in tablet form 3 times a day. The intervention period included two sessions over 24 weeks. The primary outcome be the effectiveness of GLJC on cognitive improvement after 24 weeks of treatment, which was defined as an increase in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Scale. The secondary outcomes were improvement in independence, daily living ability, and Chinese medicine (CM) syndrome, which were measured with the Alzheimer's disease Rating Scale-Cognitive Project (ADAS-Cog), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Total Score, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Total Score and the Chinese Medicine Symptom Scale (CM-SS), respectively. Serum acetylcholine, acetylcholinesterase, bax and bcl-2 were monitored to explore the mechanism of GLJC on CI. In addition, safety measures, including vital signs, electrocardiography, laboratory indicators (full blood count, kidney and liver function tests, routine urine test and routine stool test) and adverse events, were also recorded. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLJC in patients with mild-to-moderate CI with kidney and marrow deficiency syndrome. If successful, the results would provide a viable treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate CI. (Clinical Trials.gov. ID: NCT03647384. Registered on 23 August 2018).


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Organic Chemicals/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Capsules , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Chin J Integr Med ; 26(3): 212-218, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32180150

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term therapeutic effects of the Chinese medicine Jiannao Yizhi Formula (, JYF) in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Sixty mild-to-moderate AD participants were recruited and randomly allocated to the treatment (30 with JYF) and the control groups (30 with donepezil) for 6 months with the random numbers. The primary outcomes were scores of Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) and Chinese Medicine Symptom Scale (CM-SS). The secondary outcomes were scores of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Safety assessments were conducted at baseline and the 6th month of treatment. Serum levels of acetylcholine (Ach), amyloid-ß protein 42 (Aß42), and the microtubule-associated protein tau (Tau) were also determined by enzyme-liked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Fifty-one participants were included in the final analyses (JYF n=27; donepezil n=24). Compared with baseline, both JYF and donepezil increased the MoCA and MMSE scores and decreased the ADAS-Cog and CM-SS scores (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Both drugs increased the serum levels of Ach and decreased the serum levels of Aß42 and Tau (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in these variables between the two groups, which showed that JYF was not inferior to donepezil. No obviously significant changes were observed in the ADL. No severe adverse events were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: The effect and safety of JYF for the treatment of AD were not inferior to those of donepezil.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Donepezil/therapeutic use , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alpinia , Attention/drug effects , Biomarkers/blood , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cognition/drug effects , Executive Function/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Memory/drug effects , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...