ABSTRACT
Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has been proposed as a hemodynamic parameter that can reliably reflect the blood flow in stenosed coronary arteries. Currently, there are few investigations on the quantitative analysis of iFR in the patients regarding the variation of microcirculatory resistance (MR). The data aim to provide geometric (cross-section area of branches) and hemodynamic (flow rate and iFR of branches) parameters of normal and stenosed coronary arteries derived from CFD simulation. The CFD simulation was performed on the three-dimensional artery models reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images of four subjects. The hemodynamic parameters were obtained in six situations of MR to simulate coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). This dataset could be used as the reference to estimate the iFR and flow rate in patients with CMD and stenosis in coronary arteries. The geometric parameters could be used in the modelling of coronary arteries.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has been proposed to estimate the hemodynamic severity of atherosclerotic stenosis in coronary arteries. The atherosclerotic stenosis in a proximal coronary artery could change its distal microcirculatory resistance (MR). However, there is a lack of investigation about the effect of MR variation on the blood flow and iFR of stenotic coronary arteries. We aim to investigate the changes of blood flow and iFR caused by distal MR variation. METHODS: Four three-dimensional models of coronary arteries were reconstructed from the computed tomography images of two normal cases and two cases with 74.9% and 96.4% (in area) stenoses in a large branch of left anterior descending artery (LAD). Computational fluid dynamics simulation was performed on each model under 6 MR situations: hyperemia as the reference situation, resting when MR was multiplied by 8/3 in all outlet branches, h-one-1.5 and h-one-2 when MR was multiplied by 1.5 and 2.0 in one branch (the stenotic, or the corresponding branch in normal case) of LAD, h-branches-1.5 and h-branches-2 when MR was multiplied by 1.5 and 2.0 in the stenotic/corresponding and its cognate branches. Flow rate and iFR of each outlet branch were then calculated and compared between different MR situations to investigate the effect of MR variation on flow rate and iFR. RESULTS: In the 74.9% stenosed and normal cases, referring to the hyperemia situation, the increase of MR in any branch significantly decreased its flow rate and increased its iFR, with limited effect on the flow rate (<3%) and iFR (<0.01) of other branches. However, in the 96.4% stenosed case, the doubled MR in the stenosed branch (h-one-2) significantly increased the flow rate (>10%) and iFR (>0.05) of its cognate branches. CONCLUSION: The increase of MR in a normal or mildly stenosed branch of coronary artery decreases its blood flow and increases its iFR, with limited effect on other branches. Whereas, the increase of MR in a severely stenotic large branch could significantly increase the flow velocity and iFR of its cognate branches.
