Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 9(45): 39165-39173, 2017 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29059530

ABSTRACT

The antimicrobial action of porous CuO microspheres (µCuO), Ag nanoparticles (nAg), and bimetallic porous CuO microspheres decorated with Ag nanoparticles (µCuO/nAg) was evaluated against surrogate microorganisms representative of pathogens commonly implicated in foodborne and healthcare-associated human infections. This work addressed the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli (Escherichia coli O157:H7-GFP B6-914), Salmonella (Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis phage-type PT21), and the Gram-positive bacteria Listeria (Listeria innocua), as well as environmental microorganisms derived from local river water. Compared to particles composed only of CuO or Ag, the bimetallic porous µCuO/nAg particle exhibits enhanced antimicrobial efficacy. The antimicrobial action of bimetallic porous µCuO/nAg particles is dose-dependent, with 50 µg/mL particle concentration completely inhibiting the growth of both the Gram-negative (Salmonella) and the Gram-positive (Listeria) bacteria after 6 h. To assess the mechanism of antimicrobial action, the changes in surface morphologies of bacteria treated with the particles were observed using scanning electron microscopy. In the case of the Gram-negative bacteria, the bacterial cell membrane is damaged, likely due to the release of metal ions from the particles; however, particle-induced cell membrane damage is not observed for Gram-positive bacteria. Collectively, results from this work shed further light on possible mechanisms of antimicrobial action of micro-/nanoparticles and highlight the potential for bimetallic particle-based inhibition of microbial infections.


Subject(s)
Metal Nanoparticles , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Copper , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Microspheres , Porosity
3.
Biotechnol Prog ; 33(3): 687-695, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28371418

ABSTRACT

The rapid detection of Salmonella in ground meat requires that living microorganisms be brought to levels detectable by PCR, immunoassays, or similar techniques within 8 h. Previously, we employed microfiltration using hollow fiber membranes to rapidly process and concentrate viable bacteria in food extracts through a combination of enzyme treatment and prefiltration in order to prevent blockage or fouling of the hollow fiber membranes. However, scanning electron microscopy and particle size analysis of enzyme hydrolysates showed that enzyme treatment followed by filtration caused submicron particles to form and be trapped within the prefiltration media, which in turn, retained about 80% of the bacteria. Filtering prior to enzyme treatment resulted in formation of a filter cake consisting of protein particles retained on the surface of the filter, while facilitating passage of the much smaller microorganisms through the filter, separating them from particulates. Subsequent enzyme treatment of the filtrate resulted in an extract that was microfiltered in less than an hour, while concentrating viable microorganisms in the extract by 500×. An inoculum of Salmonella enterica cells into turkey burger containing of 1-20 CFU/mL, consisting of spiked cells plus cells already present in the turkey burger sample, was rapidly brought to levels detectable by conventional PCR and BAX® PCR assays. The entire procedure from sample processing to detection of Salmonella enterica was achieved in less than 8 h. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 33:687-695, 2017.


Subject(s)
Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Filtration/methods , Meat/microbiology , Microscopy, Electrochemical, Scanning , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification
4.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 47(4): 512-515, 2016 Jul.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28591952

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the expressions of Livin and phosphate and tension homology deleted on chromsome ten (PTEN) protein in the cancerous tissues of ovary endometriosis. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry EliVision was used to examine the expressions of Livin and PETN protein in 19 samples of ovary endometriosis cancerous tissues, 30 samples of ovary endometriosis tissues and 30 samples of ovarian benign tumor tissues. RESULTS: The positive expression rate of Livin in ovary endometriosis cancerous tissues (68%) was obviously higher than that in ovary endometriosis tissues (36%) and benign tumor tissues (13%)( P<0.05). The positive expression rate of PTEN in ovary endometriosis cancerous tissues (16%) was obviously lower than that in ovary endometriosis tissues (65%) and benign tumor tissues (80%)( P<0.01). There was no correlations between positive expressions of Livin and age, clinical stage, grading, histological type and lymphatic metastasis of ovary endometriosis cancer ( P>0.05), the same result was also found for PTEN. Livin and PTEN expression presented an obviously negative correlation in ovary endometriosis cancer ( r=-0.559, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Up-regulation of Livin expression and down-regulation of PTEN may be involved in the occurrence and development of ovary endometriosis cancerization.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Endometriosis/genetics , Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lymphatic Metastasis
5.
Biotechnol Prog ; 31(6): 1551-62, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26400739

ABSTRACT

Microfiltration of chicken extracts has the potential to significantly decrease the time required to detect Salmonella, as long as the extract can be efficiently filtered and the pathogenic microorganisms kept in a viable state during this process. We present conditions that enable microfiltration by adding endopeptidase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to chicken extracts or chicken rinse, prior to microfiltration with fluid flow on both retentate and permeate sides of 0.2 µm cutoff polysulfone and polyethersulfone hollow fiber membranes. After treatment with this protease, the distribution of micron, submicron, and nanometer particles in chicken extracts changes so that the size of the remaining particles corresponds to 0.4-1 µm. Together with alteration of dissolved proteins, this change helps to explain how membrane fouling might be minimized because the potential foulants are significantly smaller or larger than the membrane pore size. At the same time, we found that the presence of protein protects Salmonella from protease action, thus maintaining cell viability. Concentration and recovery of 1-10 CFU Salmonella/mL from 400 mL chicken rinse is possible in less than 4 h, with the microfiltration step requiring less than 25 min at fluxes of 0.028-0.32 mL/cm(2) min. The entire procedure-from sample processing to detection by polymerase chain reaction-is completed in 8 h.


Subject(s)
Filtration/instrumentation , Filtration/methods , Meat/microbiology , Membranes, Artificial , Peptide Hydrolases/metabolism , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Biotechnology , Chickens , Equipment Design , Particle Size , Tissue Extracts/metabolism
6.
J Environ Manage ; 152: 91-8, 2015 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25617873

ABSTRACT

Volatile fatty acids (VFA) play an important role in the biodegradation of organic wastes and production of bioenergy under anaerobic digestion, and are related to malodors. However, little is known about the dynamics of VFA during dairy manure storage. This study evaluated the characteristics of VFA in dairy manure before and after anaerobic co-digestion in a laboratory experiment using eight lab-scale reactors. The reactors were loaded with four different types of dairy manure: (1) liquid dairy manure from a freestall barn, (2) mixture of dairy manure and co-digestion food processing wastes at the inlet of an anaerobic digester, (3) effluent from the digester outlet, and (4) the liquid fraction of effluent from a solid separator. Four VFA (acetic, propionic, butyric, and 2-methylbutyric acids) were identified and quantified in weekly manure samples from all reactors. Results showed that the dominant VFA was acetic acid in all four manure sources. The off-farm co-digestion wastes significantly increased the total VFA concentrations and the proportions of individual VFA in the influent. The dairy manure under storage demonstrated high temporal and spatial variations in pH and VFA concentrations. Anaerobic digestion reduced the total VFA by 86%-96%; but solid-liquid separation did not demonstrate a significant reduction in total VFA in this study. Using VFA as an indicator, anaerobic digestion exhibited an effective reduction of dairy manure odor offensiveness.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/prevention & control , Fatty Acids, Volatile/metabolism , Manure/analysis , Odorants/prevention & control , Anaerobiosis , Animals , Biodegradation, Environmental , Bioreactors , Cattle , Manure/classification
7.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 79(22): 7048-54, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24014538

ABSTRACT

This paper reports an approach to enable rapid concentration and recovery of bacterial cells from aqueous chicken homogenates as a preanalytical step of detection. This approach includes biochemical pretreatment and prefiltration of food samples and development of an automated cell concentration instrument based on cross-flow microfiltration. A polysulfone hollow-fiber membrane module having a nominal pore size of 0.2 µm constitutes the core of the cell concentration instrument. The aqueous chicken homogenate samples were circulated within the cross-flow system achieving 500- to 1,000-fold concentration of inoculated Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and naturally occurring microbiota with 70% recovery of viable cells as determined by plate counting and quantitative PCR (qPCR) within 35 to 45 min. These steps enabled 10 CFU/ml microorganisms in chicken homogenates or 10(2) CFU/g chicken to be quantified. Cleaning and sterilizing the instrument and membrane module by stepwise hydraulic and chemical cleaning (sodium hydroxide and ethanol) enabled reuse of the membrane 15 times before replacement. This approach begins to address the critical need for the food industry for detecting food pathogens within 6 h or less.


Subject(s)
Filtration/methods , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Microbiology/methods , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Meat/microbiology , Salmonella enteritidis/isolation & purification , Animals , Chickens/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Food Handling/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...