Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 8(9): e021025, 2018 09 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30181184

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics and predictors for anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma from the perspective of anastomotic level. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: A single tertiary medical centre in China. PARTICIPANTS: From January 2010 to December 2016, all patients with oesophageal cancer of the distal oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction undergoing elective oesophagectomy with a curative intent for oesophageal carcinoma with intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis (IOA) versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis (COA) were included. We investigated anastomotic level and perioperative confounding factors as potential risk factors for postoperative leakage by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the odds of anastomotic leakage by different confounding factors. Secondary outcome was the association of IOA versus COA with other postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of 458 patients included, 126 underwent cervical anastomosis and 332 underwent intrathoracic anastomosis. Anastomotic leakage developed in 55 patients (12.0%), with no statistical differences between COA and IOA (16.6% vs 10.2%; p=0.058). Multivariable analysis identified active diabetes mellitus (OR 2.001, p=0.047), surgical procedure (open: reference; minimally invasive: OR 1.770, p=0.049) and anastomotic method (semimechanical: reference; stapled: OR 1.821; handsewn: OR 2.271, p=0.048) rather than anastomotic level (IOA: reference; COA: OR 1.622, p=0.110) were independent predictors of leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical and anastomotic techniques rather than the level of anastomotic site were independent predictors of postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing oesophageal cancer surgery.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Esophagus/surgery , Stomach/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , China , Diabetes Complications/complications , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Esophagectomy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Suture Techniques/adverse effects
2.
Eur J Radiol ; 73(2): 396-403, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19108974

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapeutic ablation of uterine fibroids in patients with bowel lies anterior to uterus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with 23 uterine fibroids underwent MR imaging-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment, with a mean age of 39.4+/-6.9 (20-49) years, with fibroids average measuring 6.0+/-1.6 (range, 2.9-9.5)cm in diameter. After being compressed with a degassed water balloon on abdominal wall, MR imaging-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment was performed under conscious sedation by using fentanyl and midazolam. This procedure was performed by a Haifu JM focused ultrasound tumour therapeutic system (JM2.5C, Chongqing Haifu Technology Co., Ltd., China), in combination with a 1.5-Tesla MRI system (Symphony, Siemens, Germany), which provides real-time guidance and control. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed to evaluate the efficacy of thermal ablation immediately and 3 months after HIFU treatment. The treatment time and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The mean fibroid volume was 97.0+/-78.3 (range, 12.7-318.3)cm(3). According to the treatment plan, an average 75.0+/-11.4% (range, 37.8-92.4%) of the fibroid volume was treated. The mean fibroid volume immediately after HIFU was 109.7+/-93.1 (range, 11.9-389.6)cm(3), slightly enlarged because of edema. The average non-perfused volume was 83.3+/-71.7 (range, 7.7-282.9)cm(3), the average fractional ablation, which was defined as non-perfused volume divided by the fibroid volume immediately after HIFU treatment, was 76.9+/-18.7% (range, 21.0-97.0%). There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment volume and the non-perfused volume. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 months obtained in 12 patients, the fibroid volume decreased by 31.4+/-29.3% (range, -1.9 to 60.0%) in average, with paired t-test showing a statistically significant reduction (P=0.002). The mean treatment time for ablating the average 83.3+/-71.7 (range, 7.7-282.9)cm(3) of fibroid volume was 2.5+/-1.4h (range, 27-390min) in this study, which was relatively short and acceptable to patient and therapist. Four patients experienced mild skin burn (two with skin redness, two with blisters), the skin burn subsided within approximately 2 days. No other adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: After the bowel was compressed with a degassed water balloon, MR imaging-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment is safe and feasible in ablating uterine fibroids in patients with bowel lies anterior to uterus.


Subject(s)
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , Leiomyoma/pathology , Leiomyoma/therapy , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Intestines/pathology , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Uterus/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...