ABSTRACT
Background and Aims: Emergency endoscopy is recommended for patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) and their prognosis has improved markedly over past decades due to the increased specialization of endoscopic practice. The study aimed to compare outcomes following emergency endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in cirrhotic patients with acute EVB. Methods: Cirrhotic patients with acute EVB who underwent emergency endoscopy were retrospectively enrolled from 2013 to 2020 across 34 university hospitals from 30 cities. The primary outcome was the incidence of 5-day rebleeding after emergency endoscopy. Subgroup analysis was stratified by Child-Pugh class and bleeding history. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. Results: A total of 1,017 and 382 patients were included in EIS group and EVL group, respectively. The 5-day rebleeding incidence was similar between EIS group and EVL group (4% vs. 5%, P = 0.45). The result remained the same after PSM (P = 1.00). Among Child-Pugh class A, B and C patients, there were no differences in the 5-day rebleeding incidence between the two groups after PSM (P = 0.25, 0.82, and 0.21, respectively). As for the patients with or without bleeding history, the differences between EIS group and EVL group were not significant after PSM (P = 1.00 and 0.26, respectively). Conclusion: The nationwide cohort study indicates that EIS and EVL are both efficient emergency endoscopic treatment strategies for acute EVB. EIS should not be dismissed as an economical and effective emergency endoscopic treatment strategy of acute EVB. ClincialTrials.gov number NCT04307264.
ABSTRACT
Upadacitinib, as a selective and reversible Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has been widely used in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, ulcerative colitis and other inflammatory bowel diseases and other immune-mediated diseases. The combination of methotrexate and upadacitinib is a common clinical treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in recent years. In this study, we established an ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay for quantitative measurement of upadacitinib and methotrexate, by which we successfully determined pharmacokinetic parameters of them in rat plasma. In order to pretreat the samples, we used acetonitrile as the precipitant, and for the internal standard (IS), we chose tofacitinib. The Acquity BEHC18 (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 µm) column, with acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution composed mobile phases, was used to separate upadacitinib, methotrexate and tofacitinib. A Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer was used as the detecting instrument in the positive ion mode. For upadacitinib, excellent linearity was shown of this assay in the calibration range with 0.1-200 ng/mL, and as for methotrexate, the range was 0.05-100 ng/mL. As the results indicated, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was respectively 0.1 and 0.05 ng/mL for upadacitinib and methotrexate, the intra- and inter-day precision were ≤ 13.3%, and the accuracy of all the analytes ranged from -4.1% to 12.7%. The recovery of each analyte was > 80.2% in this experiment, and matrix effects we observed were unobvious. The establishment of this method and its successful application in rat plasma can provide a theoretical and technical support for the deeper study of pharmacodynamics and the clinical medication strategies.
