Homogenization of the management of acute paronychia with abscess formation within the context of an evaluation of professional practices.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus in the literature, or even within the same team, on the most appropriate treatment option for acute paronychia with abscess formation. The performance of an evaluation of professional practices (EPP) using a clinical audit measures the quality of our practices with the aim of standardizing them. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to develop a clinical pathway for the management of acute paronychia with abscess formation. The secondary objectives were to evaluate our professional practices using a clinical audit before and after the dissemination of the clinical pathway and then recommend strategies for improving our management of acute paronychia with abscess formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A working group was established that designed an audit grid comprised of 15 items. Thirty patients (Group 1) who had an acute paronychia with abscess formation were included and their health records were analyzed using this audit grid. The working group then developed a clinical pathway for the management of acute paronychia with abscess formation. Thirty new patients (Group 2) were included after the dissemination of this clinical pathway and their records were analyzed using the same audit grid. RESULTS: Our clinical pathway for the management of acute paronychia was validated by the local infectious disease committee of our university hospital center. The difference between groups 1 and 2 was significant (p<0.05) for eight items. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical revision between the two groups. DISCUSSION: This EPP enabled us to develop a clinical pathway that detailed the processes for managing acute paronychia with abscess formation, and in particular it provided indications for antibiotic therapy and its limitations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

The Oberlin procedure for restoration of elbow flexion with the da Vinci robot: four cases.

UNLABELLED: Robotics allows up to 40× visual magnification and 10× magnification of the surgeon's movements, and eliminates physiologic tremors. These properties should allow the development of mini-invasive limb surgery, especially of the brachial plexus. The purpose of this work was to test the feasibility of the restoration of elbow flexion according to the technique of Oberlin using a da Vinci robot. The authors' series included four patients (average age, 31 years) presenting with elbow flexion paralysis. They were operated on 8 months after injury using a da Vinci S robot. In three patients, the open technique (technique 1) was used, and the mini-invasive approach (technique 2) was used for the last one. Strength of elbow flexion was measured. After 1-year follow-up, all of the patients had recovered elbow flexion. No sensory or motor deficit was found in the ulnar nerve territory. There was no difficulty with technique 1; technique 2, however, required a conversion to technique 1 because of difficulty visualizing the operative field. The results of the authors' series show the feasibility of the robot-assisted technique for the Oberlin procedure. The lack of sensory feedback was not an issue. The development of specific retractors and instruments should improve the mini-invasive technique. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Preliminary results of double nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in upper type brachial plexus palsies.

BACKGROUND: Restoration of elbow flexion is the main objective in the treatment of brachial plexus palsies affecting the upper roots. Transfer of the ulnar nerve to the nerve of the biceps has given satisfactory results, but the restored biceps is often weak in cases with avulsions of the C5-C6-C7 roots, in elderly patients, and after long preoperative delays. The authors decided to investigate a double nerve transfer: one or more fascicles of the ulnar nerve to the nerve to the biceps and a fascicle of the median nerve to the motor branch to the brachialis muscle. METHODS: The authors operated on 15 patients using this technique. The authors have follow-up of more than 6 months in 10 of them. Six had C5-C6 injuries, three had C5-C6-C7 palsies, and one had sustained an infraclavicular injury. The average age was 27.2 years. The average delay before surgery was 6.6 months. The average follow-up was 12.1 months. RESULTS: Grade 4 elbow flexion was restored in each of the 10 patients. In 10 cases, the patients were able to lift 1 to 5 kg. There was no secondary deficit in grip strength or sensation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this technique compare favorably with those of other methods. The percentage of success and the strength of elbow flexion restored were increased without any morbidity. This technique will probably reduce the need for secondary procedures to augment elbow flexion. The authors propose double nerve transfer as a standard procedure in C5-C6 and C5-C6-C7 injuries.