Prognostic MRI parameters in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to estimate the prognostic value of some features documented on preoperative MRI study in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury. METHODS: The study was conducted in patients operated for cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) from April 2014 to October 2020. The quantitative analysis on preoperative MRI scans included: length of the spinal cord intramedullary lesion (IMLL the canal diameter at the level of maximal spinal cord compression (MSCC) and the presence of intramedullary hemorrhage. The canal diameter at the MSCC was measured on the middle sagittal FSE-T2W images at the maximum level of injury. The America Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score was used for neurological assessment at hospital admission. At 12-month follow-up all patients were examined with the SCIM questionnaire. RESULTS: At linear regression analysis, the length of the spinal cord lesion [ß coefficient -10.35, 95% confidence interval (CI)-13.71 to-6.99; p < 0.001], the diameter of the canal at the level of the MSCC (ß coefficient 6.99, 95% CI 0.65 to 13.33; p = 0.032), and the intramedullary hemorrhage (ß coefficient - 20.76, 95% CI - 38.70 to - 2.82; p = 0.025), were significantly associated with the score at the SCIM questionnaire at one year follow-up: shorter spinal cord lesion, greater diameter of the canal at the level of the MSCC, and absence of intramedullary hemorrhage were predictors of better outcome. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of our study, the spinal length lesion, canal diameter at the level of spinal cord compression and intramedullary hematoma documented by the preoperative MRI study were associated with the prognosis of patients with cSCI.

Risk factors of surgical site infections in instrumented spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of wound infections associated with instrumented spine surgery ranges from 2 to 20%. These complications may lead to poor outcomes. Knowing the risk factors associated with surgical site infections (SSI) after utilizing spinal implants is essential to avoid these complications, including hardware removal. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively 550 patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery from 2011 to 2015; 16 developed SSI after spinal instrumentation. The diagnosis of SSI was established based on positive wound swab or blood cultures, and various clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings. Additional preoperative and intraoperative risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of SSI after spinal instrumentation surgery was 2.9%. Obesity was a statistically significant parameter (P = 0.013) that contributed to SSI along with the alcoholism and/or drug abuse (P = 0.034); use of a Foley catheter nearly reached significance levels. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of SSI in patients who are obese or use drugs and/or alcohol. Clear preoperative identification of these risk factors prior to implanting spinal instrumentation should help prevent SSI in the future.

Epidural scarring after lumbar disc surgery: Equivalent scarring with/without free autologous fat grafts.

BACKGROUND: To limit epidural fibrosis and prevent scar formation/nerve tethering that may contribute to chronic postoperative pain; some surgeons have utilized epidural autologous fat grafts following lumbar microdiscectomy. METHODS: We investigated the correlation between post-microdiscectomy epidural scarring [including select magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies] and clinical outcomes in 36 patients operated for symptomatic. MRI documented L4-L5 and L5-S1 disk herniations with (18 patients) and without (18 patient) the application of free fat grafts. In addition, histological evaluation of the original fat grafts was performed in 4 patients requiring additional surgery. RESULTS: We found no clear association between the use of autologous graft fats and the clinical outcomes in this study. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study involving only 36 patients, the prospective randomized use of free autologous fat grafts did not appear to influence outcomes following microdiscectomy.