ABSTRACT
There appears to be an incompressible high rate of preterm births among populations of African origin irrespective of their geographic location. The objective of this study was to assess the risk factors for preterm birth in a French Caribbean population of African descent, offered medical care comparable to that on the French mainland, but presenting a higher rate of preterm birth. The study was based on a birth cohort at maternity hospitals in Guadeloupe (French West Indies) including 911 singleton pregnancies enrolled during their third trimester check-up visits. Associations between risk factors and the risk of preterm delivery (spontaneous and induced) were assessed using a multivariate Cox model. In addition, prevalences of sociodemographic and medical factors in Guadeloupe were compared with those on the French mainland. 144 women (15.8 %) delivered preterm, medically induced in 52 %. Women delivering preterm were more often over 35 years old (37 %), single (54 %), and had higher prevalence of prior preterm birth (20 %), prior miscarriage (37 %), lupus (3 %), asthma (14 %), gestational hypertension (26 %), gestational diabetes (13 %) and urinary tract infection (24 %) than women with term births. In the whole cohort, these risk factors were also more frequent than in mainland France. Our results suggest highly prevalent medical risk factors for preterm births in Guadeloupe. This observation combined with specific social risk factors (older maternal age, single living) less frequent on the French mainland probably explains a large part of a higher prevalence of preterm births in this population despite similar medical provision.
Subject(s)
Infant, Premature , Pregnancy Complications/ethnology , Premature Birth/ethnology , Socioeconomic Factors , Adult , Age Factors , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Female , Guadeloupe/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Obstetric Labor, Premature/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Intracoronary brachytherapy aims at a reduction of in-stent restenosis by lessening neo-intimal proliferation. To assess its clinical potential, a systematic review of the literature indexed in the standard biomedical bibliographic databases selected eight prospective randomized clinical trials; seven of them, comparing coronary brachytherapy and non-treatment or placebo, have been included in the present meta-analysis. This analysis confirms the angiographic benefit of this procedure, as reported in the individual studies; it also shows, however an excess of clinical adverse effects not exhibited by any individual trial. Therefore, intracoronary brachytherapy cannot be recommended as routine practice, while one cannot rule out its interest in special situations.
