ABSTRACT
Background: Aesthetic breast surgery (ABS) encompasses breast augmentation, breast reduction, mastopexy, and mastopexy augmentation. This topic has seldom been assessed as a bibliometric study. This analysis aims to address this gap and identify trends in ABS literature to guide future research areas. Bibliometrics, the quantitative analysis of publications, particularly scholarly literature, offers valuable insights into research trends and impact. Objectives: This analysis aims to address this gap and identify trends in ABS literature to guide future research areas. Methods: The 100 most-cited publications in ABS were identified on Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA), across all available journal years (from 1953 to 2024). Study details, including the citation count, main content focus, and outcome measures, were extracted and tabulated from each publication. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine and levels of evidence (LOE) of each study were assessed. Results: The 100 most-cited publications in ABS were cited by a total of 11,522 publications. Citations per publication ranged from 46 to 1211 (mean 115.2 ± 135.7), with the highest-cited study being the Pusic BREAST-Q paper (n = 1211). A majority of publications were LOE 4 (n = 30), representative of the large number of case series. The number of publications for LOE 5, 3, 2, and 1 was 12, 28, 21, and 9, respectively. The main content focus was "outcomes" in 52 publications, followed by "nonoperative management" (n = 12) and "surgical technique" (n = 12). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used in 29 publications, and 53 publications reported aesthetic outcome measures. Conclusions: This analysis highlights that research methodologies in ABS studies should be improved. This necessary improvement would be facilitated by vigorous, high-quality research, and the implementation of validated ABS-specific PROMs enhancing patient satisfaction, particularly in aesthetic procedures, such as BREAST-Q.
ABSTRACT
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer. BCCs are seldom reported on the sole of the foot due to a lack of exposure to UV radiation which is the main risk factor. We present a brief literature review and case report of a 42-year-old female with a non-resolving lesion on the mid-arch of her left foot over a 20-year period. Tissue diagnosis identified the lesion as a BCC. Disease-free control was achieved but the patient experienced significant morbidity resulting in three separate procedures to diagnose, excise and reconstruct the defect. When evaluating lesions on the sole clinicians should consider BCC as a differential, particularly in those which do not respond to initial treatment.
