ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Trisegmentectomy, or resection of the upper subdivision of the left upper lobe with preservation of the lingula, is considered by some authors to be equivalent to right upper lobectomy with middle lobe preservation. Our objective was to compare survival and recurrence after trisegmentectomy versus left upper lobectomy procedures registered in the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery group (GEVATS) database. METHODS: We compared mortality, survival and recurrence in patients with left upper lobectomy or trisegmentectomy after propensity score matching for the following variables: age, smoking habit, tumor size, histologic type, radiological density of tumor, surgical access, forced expiratory volume in one second, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, hypertension, chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmia, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and pre-surgery nodal status by positron emission tomography/computed tomography. RESULTS: A total of 540 left upper lobectomies and 83 trisegmentectomies were registered in the GEVATS database. After propensity score matching, 134 left upper lobectomies and 67 trisegmentectomies were selected. Survival outcomes were similar, but differences were found for recurrence (21.5% for trisegmentectomies vs. 35.4% for left upper lobectomies, p=0.05). Moreover, the recurrence patterns differed, with the lobectomy group showing a greater tendency to distant dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: Trisegmentectomy and left upper lobectomy show similar 5-year survival rates. In our database, recurrence after trisegmentectomy was lower than after left upper lobectomy, while the recurrence pattern differed among the 2 surgical approaches, with a greater tendency to distant metastasis after left upper lobectomy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus in the literature on preoperative histological analysis for lung cancer. The objective of this study was to assess 4 diagnostic models used in different hospitals with differing practices regarding preoperative histological diagnosis and the consequences in terms of unnecessary surgery and futile major resection. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective observational study collected from 4 university hospitals in Spain over 3 years (January 2019 to December 2021). We included all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of primary lung cancer and any patients with suspected primary lung cancer who had undergone surgery. All patients underwent computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans. Each multidisciplinary committee was free to choose whether to perform flexible bronchoscopic or transthoracic lung biopsy. Decisions concerning whether to perform intraoperative sample analysis, the surgical approach and the type of resection were left to the surgical team. RESULTS: We included a total of 1642 patients. The use of flexible endoscopy and its diagnostic performance varied substantially between hospitals (range: 23.8-79.3% and 25-60.7%, respectively); and the same was observed for transthoracic biopsy and its performance (range: 16.9-82.3% and 64.6-97%, respectively). Regarding major resection surgery (lobectomy or more extensive resection), the lowest rate was observed in hospital C (1%) and the highest in hospital B (2.8%), with between-hospital differences not reaching significance (P = 0.173). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of histological sampling before lung cancer surgery still varies between hospitals. In spite of very diverse multidisciplinary management, the rate of futile lobectomy is not significantly higher in hospitals with lower rates of preoperative histological analysis.
