Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 142(1): 7-14, ene. 2014.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-117860

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivo: En España, donde las enfermedades cardiovasculares constituyen la primera causa de muerte, el control de factores de riesgo es bajo. Este estudio analiza la implantación de la valoración del riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) en la práctica clínica y la existencia de objetivos de control entre los indicadores de calidad asistencial y los sistemas de incentivación profesional. Método: Entre 2010 y 2011, mediante un cuestionario diseñado ad hoc, se recogió información de cada Comunidad Autónoma (CCAA) sobre prevalencia y control de los principales factores de RCV, y valoración del RCV y objetivos de control entre los indicadores de calidad y los sistemas de incentivación de Atención Primaria. Quince de las 17 CCAA respondieron al cuestionario. Resultados: El RCV se calcula con SCORE en 9 CCAA, REGICOR en 3 y Framingham en 3, con coberturas del 3,4 al 77,6%. El control de los factores de RCV fue en general bajo y variable: hipertensión (22,7-61,3%), dislipidemia (11-45,1%), diabetes (18,5-84%) y tabaquismo (20-50,5%). Muchas CCAA no incluyeron el RCV entre los indicadores de calidad asistencial o los sistemas de incentivación, escaseando las iniciativas sobre estilos de vida. Conclusiones: Existe variabilidad en las políticas de prevención cardiovascular entre las CCAA. Convendría extender la implantación de una guía consensuada de prevención cardiovascular, la valoración del RCV en la historia clínica electrónica, haciendo especial énfasis en los estilos de vida, y la incorporación de la valoración y control del RCV entre los indicadores de calidad asistencial y los sistemas de incentivación profesional (AU)


Background and objective: In Spain, where cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death, control of their risk factors is low. This study analyzes the implementation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) assessment in clinical practice and the existence of control objectives amongst quality care indicators and professional incentive systems. Method: Between 2010 and 2011, data from each autonomous community were collected, by means of a specific questionnaire concerning prevalence and control of major CVR factors, CVR assessment, and implementation of control objectives amongst quality care indicators and primary care incentive systems. Results: Fifteen out of 17 autonomous communities filled in the questionnaire. CVR was calculated through SCORE in 9 autonomous communities, REGICOR in 3 and Framingham in 3, covering 3.4 to 77.6% of target population. The resulting control of the main CVR factors was low and variable: hypertension (22.7-61.3%), dyslipidemia (11-45.1%), diabetes (18.5-84%) and smoking (20-50.5%). Most autonomous communities did not consider CVR assessment and control amongst quality care indicators or incentive systems, highlighting the lack of initiatives on lifestyles. Conclusions: Variability exists in cardiovascular prevention policies among autonomous communities. It is necessary to implement a common agreed cardiovascular prevention guide, to encourage physicians to implement CVR in electronic clinical history, and to promote CVR assessment and control inclusion amongst quality care indicators and professional incentive systems, focusing on lifestyles management (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Quality of Health Care/trends , Risk Factors , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
2.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 142(1): 7-14, 2014 Jan 07.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23433666

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In Spain, where cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death, control of their risk factors is low. This study analyzes the implementation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) assessment in clinical practice and the existence of control objectives amongst quality care indicators and professional incentive systems. METHOD: Between 2010 and 2011, data from each autonomous community were collected, by means of a specific questionnaire concerning prevalence and control of major CVR factors, CVR assessment, and implementation of control objectives amongst quality care indicators and primary care incentive systems. RESULTS: Fifteen out of 17 autonomous communities filled in the questionnaire. CVR was calculated through SCORE in 9 autonomous communities, REGICOR in 3 and Framingham in 3, covering 3.4 to 77.6% of target population. The resulting control of the main CVR factors was low and variable: hypertension (22.7-61.3%), dyslipidemia (11-45.1%), diabetes (18.5-84%) and smoking (20-50.5%). Most autonomous communities did not consider CVR assessment and control amongst quality care indicators or incentive systems, highlighting the lack of initiatives on lifestyles. CONCLUSIONS: Variability exists in cardiovascular prevention policies among autonomous communities. It is necessary to implement a common agreed cardiovascular prevention guide, to encourage physicians to implement CVR in electronic clinical history, and to promote CVR assessment and control inclusion amongst quality care indicators and professional incentive systems, focusing on lifestyles management.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Spain
3.
Clín. investig. arterioscler. (Ed. impr.) ; 25(3): 127-139, jul.-ago. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-115856

ABSTRACT

Las guías europeas de prevención cardiovascular contemplan 2 sistemas de evaluación de la evidencia (SEC y GRADE) y recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, interviniendo en todas las etapas de la vida, con la dieta como piedra angular de la prevención. La valoración del riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) incorpora los niveles de HDL y los factores psicosociales, una categoría de muy alto riesgo y el concepto edad-riesgo. Se recomienda el uso de métodos cognitivo-conductuales (entrevista motivadora, intervenciones psicológicas), aplicados por profesionales sanitarios, con la participación de familiares de los pacientes, para contrarrestar el estrés psicosocial y reducir el RCV mediante dietas saludables, entrenamiento físico, abandono del tabaco y cumplimiento terapéutico. También se requieren medidas de salud pública, como la prohibición de fumar en lugares públicos o eliminar los ácidos grasos trans de la cadena alimentaria. Otras novedades consisten en desestimar el tratamiento antiagregante en prevención primaria y la recomendación de mantener la presión arterial dentro del rango 130-139/80-85 mmHg en pacientes diabéticos o con RCV alto. Se destaca el bajo cumplimiento terapéutico observado, porque influye en el pronóstico de los pacientes y en los costes sanitarios. Para mejorar la prevención cardiovascular se precisa una verdadera alianza entre políticos, administraciones, asociaciones científicas y profesionales de la salud, fundaciones de salud, asociaciones de consumidores, pacientes y sus familias, que impulse la estrategia tanto poblacional como individual mediante el uso de toda la evidencia científica disponible, desde ensayos clínicos hasta estudios observacionales y modelos matemáticos para evaluar intervenciones a nivel poblacional, incluyendo análisis de coste-efectividad (AU)


Based on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence-SEC and GRADE-European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL levels and psychosocial factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g., motivational interviewing, psychological interventions, led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient's family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions-such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain-are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure (BP) within the 130-139/80-85 mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally, due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasis is given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed. In sum, improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage of the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyses


Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Premedication , Risk Factors , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
4.
Av. diabetol ; 29(4): 95-107, jul.-ago. 2013. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-116648

ABSTRACT

Las guías europeas de prevención cardiovascular contemplan 2 sistemas de evaluación de la evidencia (SEC y GRADE) y recomiendan combinar las estrategias poblacional y de alto riesgo, interviniendo en todas las etapas de la vida, con la dieta como piedra angular de la prevención. La valoración del riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) incorpora los niveles de HDL y los factores psicosociales, una categoría de muy alto riesgo y el concepto edad-riesgo. Se recomienda el uso de métodos cognitivo-conductuales (entrevista motivadora, intervenciones psicológicas), aplicados por profesionales sanitarios, con la participación de familiares de los pacientes, para contrarrestar el estrés psicosocial y reducir el RCV mediante dietas saludables, entrenamiento físico, abandono del tabaco y cumplimiento terapéutico. También se requieren medidas de salud pública, como la prohibición de fumar en lugares públicos o eliminar los ácidos grasos trans de la cadena alimentaria. Otras novedades consisten en desestimar el tratamiento antiagregante en prevención primaria y la recomendación de mantener la presión arterial dentro del rango 130-139/80-85 mmHg en pacientes diabéticos o con RCV alto. Se destaca el bajo cumplimiento terapéutico observado, porque influye en el pronóstico de los pacientes y en los costes sanitarios. Para mejorar la prevención cardiovascular se precisa una verdadera alianza entre políticos, administraciones, asociaciones científicas y profesionales de la salud, fundaciones de salud, asociaciones de consumidores, pacientes y sus familias, que impulse la estrategia tanto poblacional como individual mediante el uso de toda la evidencia científica disponible, desde ensayos clínicos hasta estudios observacionales y modelos matemáticos para evaluar intervenciones a nivel poblacional, incluyendo análisis de coste-efectividad


Based on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence (SEC and GRADE) European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL levels and psychosocial factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g., motivational interviewing, psychological interventions) led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient's family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions - such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain - are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure within the 130-139/80-85 mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally, due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasis is given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed. In sum, improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage of the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyses


Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Disease Prevention , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Risk Factors
5.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 87(2): 103-20, 2013.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23775101

ABSTRACT

Based on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence--SEC and GRADE--European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL levels and psychosocial factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g., motivational interviewing, psychological interventions, led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient's family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions--such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain--are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure (BP) within the 130-139/80-85 mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally, due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasis is given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed. In sum, improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage of the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyses.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/standards , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/psychology , Diet/economics , Humans , Public Health , Risk Factors , Smoking Cessation , Spain
6.
Clin Investig Arterioscler ; 25(3): 127-39, 2013.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726872

ABSTRACT

Based on the two main frameworks for evaluating scientific evidence (SEC and GRADE) European cardiovascular prevention guidelines recommend interventions across all life stages using a combination of population-based and high-risk strategies with diet as the cornerstone of prevention. The evaluation of cardiovascular risk (CVR) incorporates HDL levels and psychosocial factors, a very high risk category, and the concept of age-risk. They also recommend cognitive-behavioural methods (e.g., motivational interviewing, psychological interventions) led by health professionals and with the participation of the patient's family, to counterbalance psychosocial stress and reduce CVR through the institution of positive habits such as a healthy diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and adherence to treatment. Additionally, public health interventions - such as smoking ban in public areas or the elimination of trans fatty acids from the food chain - are also essential. Other innovations include abandoning antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention and the recommendation of maintaining blood pressure within the 130-139/80-85mmHg range in diabetic patients and individuals with high CVR. Finally, due to the significant impact on patient progress and medical costs, special emphasis is given to the low therapeutic adherence levels observed. In sum, improving cardiovascular prevention requires a true partnership among the political class, public administrations, scientific and professional associations, health foundations, consumer associations, patients and their families. Such partnership would promote population-based and individual strategies by taking advantage of the broad spectrum of scientific evidence available, from clinical trials to observational studies and mathematical models to evaluate population-based interventions, including cost-effectiveness analyses.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Prevention/methods , Age Factors , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Europe , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Risk Factors , Smoking Cessation , Spain
7.
BMC Fam Pract ; 14: 36, 2013 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23506390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The successful implementation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines relies heavily on primary care physicians (PCPs) providing risk factor evaluation, intervention and patient education. The aim of this study was to ascertain the degree of awareness and implementation of the Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines on CVD prevention in clinical practice (CEIPC guidelines) among PCPs. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of PCPs was conducted in Spain between January and June 2011. A random sample of 1,390 PCPs was obtained and stratified by region. Data were collected by means of a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: More than half (58%) the physicians were aware of and knew the recommendations, and 62% of those claimed to use them in clinical practice, with general physicians (without any specialist accreditation) being less likely to so than family doctors. Most PCPs (60%) did not assess cardiovascular risk, with the limited time available in the surgery being cited as the greatest barrier by 81%. The main reason to be sceptical about recommendations, reported by 71% of physicians, was that there are too many guidelines. Almost half the doctors cited the lack of training and skills as the greatest barrier to the implementation of lifestyle and behavioural change recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Most PCPs were aware of the Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines on CVD prevention (CEIPC guidelines) and knew their content. However, only one third of PCPs used the guidelines in clinical practice and less than half CVD risk assessment tools.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/standards , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Practice/education , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
8.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 41(8): 463e1-463e24, ago. 2009. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-74174

ABSTRACT

Presentamos la adaptación española realizada por el Comité Español Interdisciplinario para la Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIPC) de la Guía Europea de Prevención de las Enfermedades Cardiovasculares 2008. Esta guía recomienda el modelo SCORE de riesgo bajo para valorar el riesgo cardiovascular. El objetivo es prevenir la mortalidad y la morbilidad debidas a las enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV) mediante el tratamiento de sus factores de riesgo en la práctica clínica. La guía hace énfasis en la prevención primaria y en el papel del médico y el personal de enfermería de atención primaria en la promoción de un estilo de vida cardiosaludable, basado en el incremento de los grados de actividad física, la adopción de una alimentación saludable y, en los fumadores, el abandono del tabaco. La meta terapéutica para la presión arterial es en general<140/90mmHg; pero en pacientes con diabetes mellitus, enfermedad renal crónica o ECV el objetivo es 130/80mmHg. El colesterol debe mantenerse por debajo de 200mg/dl (colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad [cLDL]<130mg/dl); en los pacientes con ECV o diabetes mellitus el objetivo es cLDL<100mg/dl (80mg/dl si factible en individuos de riesgo muy alto). En pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y en pacientes con síndrome metabólico se debe reducir el peso y aumentar la actividad física y, en su caso, utilizar los fármacos indicados, para alcanzar los objetivos del índice de masa corporal y de perímetro de cintura. El objetivo en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 debe ser alcanzar una hemoglobina glucosilada<7%. La amplia difusión de las guías y el desarrollo de los programas destinados a favorecer su implantación, en los que se identifiquen barreras y se busquen soluciones, son objetivos prioritarios del CEIPC, como uno de los medios fundamentales para trasladar las recomendaciones establecidas a la práctica clínica diaria(AU)


The present CEIPC Spanish adaptation of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD by means of dealing with its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, changing dietary habits, and not smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure<140/90mmHg, but in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is<130/80mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be<200mg/dl and cLDL<130mg/dl, although in patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is<100mg/dl (80mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, with the objective guided by body mass index and waist circumference. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin<7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to put the recommendations into practice(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Cardiovascular Diseases , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Clinical Clerkship , Risk , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Primary Health Care
9.
Aten Primaria ; 41(8): 463.e1-463.e24, 2009 Aug.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19608301

ABSTRACT

The present CEIPC Spanish adaptation of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD by means of dealing with its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, changing dietary habits, and not smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure<140/90mmHg, but in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is<130/80mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be<200mg/dl and cLDL<130mg/dl, although in patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is<100mg/dl (80mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, with the objective guided by body mass index and waist circumference. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin<7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to put the recommendations into practice.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Humans
10.
Clín. investig. arterioscler. (Ed. impr.) ; 21(3): 124-150, mayo-jun. 2009. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-61602

ABSTRACT

Presentamos la adaptación española realizada Cardiovasculares 2008. Esta guía recomienda el por el Comité Español Interdisciplinario para la modelo SCORE de riesgo bajo para valorar el Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIPC) de la Guía riesgo cardiovascular. El objetivo es prevenir la Europea de Prevención de las Enfermedades mortalidad y la morbilidad debidas a las enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV) mediante el tratamiento de sus factores de riesgo en la práctica clínica. La guía hace énfasis en la prevención primaria y en el papel del médico y el personal de enfermería de atención primaria en la promoción de un estilo de vida cardiosaludable, basado en el incremento de los grados de actividad física, la adopción de una alimentación saludable y, en los fumadores, el abandono del tabaco. La meta terapéutica para la presión arterial es en general < 140/90 mmHg; pero en pacientes con diabetes mellitus, enfermedad renal crónica o ECV el objetivo es 130/80 mmHg. El colesterol debe mantenerse por debajo de 200 mg/dl (colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad [cLDL] < 130 mg/dl); en los pacientes con ECV o diabetes mellitus el objetivo es cLDL < 100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl si factible en individuos de riesgo muy alto). En pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y en pacientes con síndrome metabólico se debe reducir el peso y aumentar la actividad física y, en su caso, utilizar los fármacos indicados, para alcanzar los objetivos del índice de masa corporal y de perímetro de cintura. El objetivo en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 debe ser alcanzar una hemoglobina glucosilada < 7%. La amplia difusión de las guías y el desarrollo de los programas destinados a favorecer su implantación, en los que se identifiquen barreras y se busquen soluciones, son objetivos prioritarios del CEIPC, como uno de los medios fundamentales para trasladar las recomendaciones establecidas a la práctica clínica diaria (AU)


The present CEIPC Spanish adaptation of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD by means of dealing with its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, changing dietary habits, and not smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure < 140/90 mmHg, but in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is < 130/80 mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be < 200 mg/dl and cLDL < 130 mg/dl, although in patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is < 100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, with the objective guided by body mass index and waist circumference. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin < 7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to put the recommendations into practice (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Prevention/trends , Health Promotion , Obesity/prevention & control , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/prevention & control , Hypercholesterolemia/prevention & control , Body Mass Index
11.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 82(6): 581-616, 2008.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19180272

ABSTRACT

We present the Spanish adaptation from the CEIPC of the European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice 2008. This guide recommends the SCORE model for risk evaluation. The aim is to prevent premature mortality and morbidity due to CVD by means of dealing with its related risk factors in clinical practice. The guide focuses on primary prevention and emphasizes the role of the nurses and primary care medical doctors in promoting a healthy life style, based on increasing physical activity, change dietary habits, and non smoking. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a Blood Pressure <140/90 mmHg, but among patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or definite CVD, the objective is <130/80 mmHg. Serum cholesterol should be <200 mg/dl and cLDL <130 mg/dl, although among patients with CVD or diabetes, the objective is <100 mg/dl (80 mg/dl if feasible in very high-risk patients). Patients with type 2 diabetes and those with metabolic syndrome must lose weight and increase their physical activity, and drugs must be administered whenever applicable, with the objective guided by BMI -body mass index- and waist circumference. In diabetic type 2 patients, the objective is glycated haemoglobin <7%. Allowing people to know the guides and developing implementation programs, identifying barriers and seeking solutions for them, are priorities for the CEIPC in order to put the recommendations into practice.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cholesterol/blood , Diet , Europe , Exercise , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...