The need for speed in the management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Rapid control of bleeding is the key to reducing bleeding complications and thereby preserving joint and musculoskeletal function in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. However, this requires early diagnosis following the onset of bleeding and strategies for rapid treatment in an outpatient setting. Overarching themes on the need for speed in managing bleeds in haemophilia patients were examined by a panel of clinicians experienced in managing inhibitor patients and joint disease during the Third Zürich Haemophilia Forum on 8 May 2009. This report summarizes the opinions of the panel on how to achieve rapid bleeding control in inhibitor patients and areas that were identified by the panel for future research or as needing new consensus guidelines. The consensus was that home treatment should be established for haemophilia patients with inhibitors, as it is associated with a faster time to treatment, as well as improvements in the quality of life of patients and their carers. In addition, as improved haemostatic control now allows inhibitor patients to participate in a wider range of physical activities, specific guidelines are required on which types of sport and work are appropriate. It was agreed that clear, systematic approaches are needed for early diagnosis of joint and muscle bleeds in inhibitor patients, which could facilitate rapid treatment. There may be opportunities for exploiting new diagnostic techniques from osteoarthritis to enable earlier diagnosis of haemophilic arthropathy. Overall, it was concluded that greater emphasis should be placed on education and patients' psychological needs, to enable inhibitor patients to cope up more effectively with their disease.

The role of prophylaxis in bleeding disorders.

SUMMARY: The rationale for long-term prophylaxis in more severe forms of von Willebrand's disease (VWD) is obvious, as mucosal bleeding and haemophilia-like joint bleeds resulting in chronic morbidity may occur. However, the experience with prophylactic treatment in this group is scanty. An international VWD Prophylaxis Network (VWD PN) was established in 2006. The VWD PN will investigate prophylaxis with retrospective and prospective studies. Eighteen centres in Europe and North America are recruiting patients and an additional 40 centres are preparing for or evaluating participation. In the absence of randomized prospective studies for most rare bleeding disorders, guidelines for prophylaxis are a subject of controversy. In situations where there is a strong family history of bleeding, long-term prophylaxis is administered in selected cases. Short intervals of prophylaxis can also be given before some surgeries or during pregnancy. The benefits of prophylaxis must be balanced by the risk of side effects. Therefore, it is essential to delineate its management in a specialized comprehensive care environment. In haemophilia, decades of clinical experience and numerous retrospective and, recently, prospective studies clearly demonstrate that prophylactic treatment is superior to on-demand treatment, regardless of whether the outcome is the number of joint- or life-threatening bleeds, arthropathy evaluated by X-ray or MRI, or quality of life measured by generic or haemophilia-specific instruments. Optimal prophylactic treatment should be started early in life (primary prophylaxis) but various options exist for the dose and dose interval. These depend on the objective of treatment in the individual patient, which, in turn, is dependent on resources in the health care system.

Paediatric haemophilia with inhibitors: existing management options, treatment gaps and unmet needs.

Development of inhibitors is a severe complication of haemophilia posing many management challenges. While a long-term goal in inhibitor patients is eradication of inhibitors through immune tolerance induction, bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) are essential for control of bleeding episodes. Paediatric patients with haemophilia and inhibitors are at particular risk of recurrent haemarthroses, and management of these patients should seek to avoid joint damage and support the child's full social and physical development. Current options for management of bleeding complications include on-demand treatment of acute bleeding episodes, secondary prophylaxis to avoid recurrent bleeds and surgery to treat affected joints. There is also a rationale for adopting prophylactic approaches to prevent bleeding in inhibitor patients, allowing this group similar opportunities for protection against arthropathy development as are given to non-inhibitor patients. This paper, based on a roundtable meeting of haematology experts at the first Zürich Haemophilia Forum in May 2008, reviews the current evidence supporting more intense and prophylactic approaches to manage bleeding risk in paediatric haemophilia patients with inhibitors, and highlights the need for investigations of primary prophylaxis in this vulnerable patient group, to support best long-term outcome.

Why does the mutation G17736A/Val107Val (silent) in the F9 gene cause mild haemophilia B in five Swedish families?

The mutation G17736A/Val107Val (silent) was found in five of a total of 86 families with haemophilia B in Sweden. It is unlikely that five families with analogous clinical expression will have the same polymorphism, which is not found in other patients or normal subjects, or that they will be the only families in the population without any other causative mutation. All affected individuals in the five families were found to have factor IX (F9) coagulation activity 15-20 U dL(-1), corresponding F9 protein levels and the same clinical history of mild haemophilia. Lymphocyte mRNA was extracted from one of the haemophiliacs and from a healthy male. RT-PCR of the mRNA and subsequent PCR amplification produced cDNA fragments of the same length from the patient and the normal subject, indicating no exon skipping or retention of introns. Sequencing of cDNA from codon 68 in exon D to codon 180 in exon F revealed that the patient had the G17736A mutation but no other abnormalities. We conclude that G17736A/Val107Val causes mild haemophilia B. Although, exon skipping and retention of introns can be excluded as pathophysiological mechanisms, it is plausible that the studied mutation has more subtle effects on a splicing site or interferes with a splicing enhancer site. Also, changes to synonymous codons may reduce the translation rate and thereby alter F9 protein folding in vivo, which would explain the phenotype. Confirmation of these assumptions requires methods that are more sensitive than those available today, and our discussion illustrates the existing obstacles.

Secondary prophylaxis with recombinant activated factor VII improves health-related quality of life of haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Haemophilia patients with inhibitors characteristically have impaired joint function and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This analysis examined whether secondary prophylaxis with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) improves HRQoL vs. conventional on-demand therapy in patients with haemophilia with inhibitors and frequent bleeds. After a 3-month preprophylaxis period, 22 patients received daily rFVIIa prophylaxis (90 or 270 microg kg(-1)) for 3 months, followed by 3 months' postprophylaxis. Days of hospitalization, absence from school/work and mobility aids requirements were recorded. HRQoL was assessed by EuroQoL (EQ-5D) questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS), derived Time to Trade-Off (TTO) scores and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). rFVIIa prophylaxis significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced bleeding frequency vs. prior on-demand therapy. Hospitalization (5.9% vs. 13.5%; P = 0.0026) and absenteeism from school/work (16.7% vs. 38.7%; P = 0.0127) decreased during prophylaxis; these effects tended to be maintained during postprophylaxis. HRQoL (evaluated by EQ-5D) tended to improve during and after rFVIIa prophylaxis. Notably, pain decreased and mobility increased in 40.9% and 27.3% of patients, respectively, at the end of the postprophylaxis period vs. preprophylaxis. Median VAS score increased from 66 to 73 (P = 0.048), and TTO scores suggested better HRQoL (0.62 vs. 0.76; P = 0.054) during postprophylaxis than preprophylaxis. Small to moderate changes in effect sizes were reported for VAS and TTO scores. Median QALYs were 0.68 (VAS) and 0.73 (TTO). Reductions in bleeding frequency with secondary rFVIIa prophylaxis were associated with improved HRQoL vs. on-demand therapy.

Functional analysis of the EGF-like domain mutations Pro55Ser and Pro55Leu, which cause mild hemophilia B.

We studied the functional role of two mutations, Pro55Ser and Pro55Leu, located in the N-terminal Epidermal Growth Factor-like domain (EGF1) of coagulation factor (F) IX. Both mutations cause mild hemophilia B with habitual FIX coagulant activities of 10-12% and FIX antigen levels of 50%. We found that activation by FVIIa/TF and FXIa was normal for FIXPro55Ser, but resulted in proteolysis of FIXPro55Leu at Arg318-Ser319 with a concomitant loss of amidolytic activity, suggesting intramolecular communication between EGF1 and the serine protease domain in FIX. This was further supported by experiments using an anti-EGF1 monoclonal antibody. Activation of FX by FIXaPro55Ser was impaired in both the presence and the absence of phospholipid or FVIIIa, indicating that Pro55 is not directly involved in binding to FVIIIa. We also studied the effect of the two Pro55 mutations on Ca2+ affinity and found only small changes. Thus, the Pro55Ser mutation causes hemophilia primarily through to an impaired ability to activate FX whereas at least in vitro the Pro55Leu defect interferes with the activation of FIX.

Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: summary statement.

Participants in an international conference on prophylactic therapy for severe haemophilia developed a consensus summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. In the consensus, participants agreed upon revised definitions for primary and secondary prophylaxis and also made recommendations concerning the need for an international system of pharmacovigilance. Considerations on starting prophylaxis, monitoring outcomes, and individualizing treatment regimens were discussed. Several research questions were identified as needing further investigation, including when to start and when to stop prophylaxis, optimal dosing and dose interval, and methods for assessment of long-term treatment effects. Such studies should include carefully defined cohorts, validated orthopaedic and quality-of-life assessment instruments, and cost-benefit analyses.

Inhibitors in the Swedish population with severe haemophilia A and B: a 20-year survey.

AIM: To survey the entire population (n = 116) afflicted with severe haemophilia A or B born in Sweden over a 20-y period (1980-1999), and to examine the epidemiological, genetic and clinical aspects of development of inhibitors to factors VIII and IX (FVIII/FIX). METHODS: One hundred of the subjects had haemophilia A and 16 had haemophilia B. All of these subjects had received prophylactic treatment and had a check-up of inhibitor status at least twice a year. Sixty-one were born between 1980 and 1989 and 55 between 1990 and 1999. RESULTS: Nineteen percent (19/100) of those with haemophilia A and 37% (6/16) with haemophilia B developed inhibitors at 12-18 mo of age, after exposure to FVIII/FIX concentrates for an average of 14 d in the case of haemophilia A and 16 d in haemophilia B. All patients with inhibitors carried mutations that impaired protein synthesis. The high incidence of FIX inhibitors may have been due to the large number of complete deletions (13%) in the Swedish haemophilia B population. Patients with haemophilia A showed no significant increase (p = 0.65) in incidence of inhibitors (n = 10/48, total incidence 21%) in the 1990s, when they were treated mainly with recombinant products, as compared to the 1980s (n = 9/52, 17%), when they received intermediate/high-purity plasma-derived concentrates. CONCLUSION: Our population-based study verifies that genotype has a general impact on the incidence of FVIII/FIX inhibitors, and that recombinant FIII/FIX concentrates are not a predisposing factor for inhibitor development.

Breastfeeding does not influence the development of inhibitors in haemophilia.

Our aim was to test the hypothesis that breastfeeding may reduce development of inhibitors in male infants with haemophilia by inducing an oral immune tolerance to factor VIII. To achieve that goal, we performed a structured epidemiological survey comprising all males born with severe haemophilia A (in all 100 patients, 19 with inhibitors) or haemophilia B (in all 16 patients, six with inhibitors) in Sweden in 1980-99. Our results show no protective effect of breastfeeding.

Aspects of haemophilia prophylaxis in Sweden.

Prophylactic treatment of haemophilia has been gaining acceptance as the optimal therapeutic option in an increasing number of haemophilia centres in the developed world in recent years. This paper focus on three aspects of prophylactic therapy: when to start treatment, venous access and the dose/dose interval. Evidence is in favour of prophylactic treatment to be started at an early age using either a peripheral vein with 1-2 injections per week and a successive increase in the frequency depending on the child and the veins, or, using a Port-A-Cath which allows a better prophylactic coverage by infusions preferably every second day in haemophilia A and every third day in haemophilia B.

Factor VIII inhibitors in two families with mild haemophilia A: structural analysis of the mutations.

The development of inhibitory antibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in patients with mild haemophilia A is uncommon. We describe here two families in which three or two members have developed inhibitors, suggesting a familial predisposition. The mutations found, in the A2 (Arg593Cys) and C1 domains (Tyr2105Cys), have been reported to give rise to inhibitor development in single individuals in addition to the family cluster we describe, strongly suggesting that these amino acid substitutions give rise to a more immunogenic protein. The analysis of structural models of activated factor VIII revealed that Arg593 is solvent-exposed and involved in a network of electrostatic interactions while Tyr2105 is partially buried and has hydrophobic interactions essentially with Ile2144. All these residues are strictly conserved in the FVIII amino acid sequence from man, pig and mouse, suggesting, at least, that they have structural roles. We propose that the two mutations in these families could cause mild haemophilia A because they induce local conformational changes (and possible secretion or intermolecular interaction problems, e.g., with von Willebrand factor) compatible with immunogenicity and production of inhibitors against the infused wild-type FVIII.

Prophylactic infusion regimens in the management of hemophilia.

To summarize, prophylactic treatment of hemophilia begun at an early age has been gaining acceptance as the optimal therapeutic option in an increasing number of hemophilia centers in the developed world in recent years. In all too many parts of the world, however, this option must be viewed as a long-range goal in hemophilia care, since national economic resources are insufficient for regular prophylactic treatment to be feasible at the moment. The future development of prophylaxis seems to be focused on three different areas. First, research has focused on improving the cost-effectiveness of the current model by testing daily, frequent injections using novel devices for venous access or continuous infusion with portable or implantable mini-pumps and administration of bio-engineered concentrates with a prolonged half-life at a reduced price. Secondly, a break-through in gene therapy, which will enable us to introduce a gene producing an amount of clotting factor sufficient to provide a continuous prophylactic concentration in the blood. Finally, the most mind-challenging option makes most of the discussion in this chapter obsolete and focuses on the development of an oral compound, peptide, or peptidomimetic agent with the capacity to activate the coagulation cascade in a controllable way.

Origin of mutation in sporadic cases of haemophilia A.

The aim of this study was to define the origin of mutation in sporadic cases of severe haemophilia A. The series was composed of 31 families with sporadic severe haemophilia A in the geographical catchment area of the Malmö haemophilia centre. The mutation was characterized in 29/31 families: inversion type 1 (n = 11), inversion type 2 (n = 3), other inversion (n = 1), small or partial deletion (n = 6), insertion (n = 2), non-sense mutation (n = 4) and mis-sense mutation (n = 2). Of 29 probands, eight carried a de novo mutation, whereas the proband's mother was found to carry the mutation in 21/29 families. Of the 21 carrier mothers, 16 had de novo mutations (i.e. the proband's maternal grandfather and grandmother were non-carriers). Owing to the lack of samples from the grandparents, origin could not be determined in the remaining five families. Polymorphisms of the FVIII gene were used to determine whether the de novo mutation of the carrier mother was of paternal or maternal origin. In 15/16 cases the mutation was of paternal origin and in 1/16 cases of maternal origin. In the series as a whole, mutation frequency was 6-fold higher in males than in females, but no differences in the ratio of sex-specific mutations rates was found among different types of mutation.

Haemophilia B carrier detection by factor IX:C analysis; no impact of the type of mutation or severity of disorder.

Haemophilia B, an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder characterized by lack or deficiency of factor IX, has been shown to be caused by any of a variety of DNA abnormalities (partial or total deletions, nonsense or missense mutations). Since in most countries carrier detection is based on factor IX coagulant activity (FIX:C) assay, this study was designed to determine whether carriers' FIX:C values are dependent on the severity of haemophilia (mild, moderate or severe) or on the genetic anomaly in the family. FIX:C concentrations were studied in 28 obligate carriers, 39 women known to carry the mutation and 33 verified noncarriers subgrouped by severity of disorder or genetic anomaly. No significant subgroup differences in FIX:C values were found, thus suggesting the level of FIX:C concentrations in carriers to be unaffected by the severity of haemophilia, or by its expression (i.e. deficient or dysfunctional factor IX). The specificity and sensitivity of FIX:C analysis for the purpose of carrier diagnosis was judged by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, where an FIX:C cut-off level of 75 IU dL-1 was found to be optimal (sensitivity 93% and specificity 88%).

Prenatal diagnosis of haemophilia.

Genotype assessment based on direct identification of the pathogenic mutation in a chorionic villi sample obtained in the 11-12th gestational week is the most reliable method for prenatal diagnosis and should be used if available. Genetic linkage studies of polymorphisms should be the second choice in the assessment of carriers and in prenatal diagnosis. Carriers of haemophilia should be offered adequate psychosocial support before, during and after the prenatal diagnostic procedures.

Prophylactic treatment in Sweden--overtreatment or optimal model?

At the haemophilia centre in Malmö, Sweden, regular prophylactic treatment is begun at 1-1 1/2 years of age, before the onset of joint bleeds. The dose and dose interval are optimised by means of pharmacokinetic studies to determine the individual patient's FVIII or IX metabolism, the goal of maintaining a level > 1% of normal being taken as a guideline which experience has shown to yield satisfactory control of bleeding diathesis. An optimal model for prophylactic treatment needs to be applicable to haemophiliacs and acceptable to health authorities in a majority of the countries in the world. To fulfill these criteria, the Swedish model, which has been shown to yield most satisfactory outcome, can hopefully be further refined in the future. Were continuous infusion, using a recombinate concentrate with a prolonged half-life, technically feasible and socially acceptable to the child, we would probably have attained the optimal model of prophylactic treatment.

Prenatal diagnosis of haemophilia.

Prenatal diagnosis of haemophilia A or B is possible by means of chorionic villus biopsy in the first trimester which traces the mutation or informative genetic markers. If possible, direct gene analysis of the mutation is preferred. The natural starting point in haemophilia A is to ascertain whether the disease is due to inversion in the X-chromosome, which is the case in almost half of the severe cases. In haemophilia B, most families carry a unique mutation which needs to be characterized. In the immediate future, much of the prenatal diagnosis will be based on indirect genetic markers, repeats or polymorphisms, of the F.VIII and IX genes. Today chorionic villus sampling is the most widely used method but amniotic fluid, fetal blood and pre-implantation genetic diagnostics can also be used in selected cases. Prenatal diagnosis must be preceded by adequate genetic counselling and risk assessment of the potential carrier and subsequent support during the diagnostic process.

Factor VIII gene inversions in severe hemophilia A: results of an international consortium study.

Twenty-two molecular diagnostic laboratories from 14 countries participated in a consortium study to estimate the impact of Factor VIII gene inversions in severe hemophilia A. A total of 2,093 patients with severe hemophilia A were studied; of those, 740 (35%) had a type 1 (distal) factor VIII inversion, and 140 (7%) showed a type 2 (proximal) inversion. In 25 cases, the molecular analysis showed additional abnormal or polymorphic patterns. Ninety-eight percent of 532 mothers of patients with inversions were carriers of the abnormal factor VIII gene; when only mothers of nonfamilial cases were studied, 9 de novo inversions in maternal germ cells were observed among 225 cases (approximately 1 de novo maternal origin of the inversion in 25 mothers of sporadic cases). When the maternal grandparental origin was examined, the inversions occurred de novo in male germ cells in 69 cases and female germ cells in 1 case. The presence of factor VIII inversions is not a major predisposing factor for the development of factor VIII inhibitors; however, slightly more patients with severe hemophilia A and factor VIII inversions develop inhibitors (130 of 642 [20%]) than patients with severe hemophilia A without inversions (131 of 821 [16%]).