ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognosis during hospitalization and maximum follow-up of 4 years in patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. METHOD: Prospective observational study practiced in a coronary Care Unit managed by cardiologists. We included patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock who received early coronary revascularization. Patients were divided into two groups: older than 75 years (group A) and lower (group B), and we compared the evolution during hospitalization and maximum follow-up of 4 years. Primary end point was mortality rate in the maximum follow-up of 4years. Secondary end point was mortality rate during hospitalization. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included, 45% Group A. Patients of Group B were mostly men (81% vs. 57%; P=.014), diabetics (48% vs. 21%; P=0.006), and smokers (39.6% vs. 5%). Mortality rate during hospitalization was higher in Group A (54.5%) vs. 30.2% in Group B (P=.022). Mortality rate during follow-up (primary variable) was 73% in Group A vs. 38% in Group B (P=.007). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock in elderly patients is an entity with high mortality during hospitalization and continues to worsen during long term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Survival Rate , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Objetivo: Comparar la evolución durante el ingreso y a largo plazo de pacientes con choque cardiogénico de origen isquémico. Método: Estudio observacional prospectivo unicéntrico llevado a cabo en la unidad coronaria de un hospital terciario manejada por cardiólogos. Se incluyen pacientes con choque cardiogénico de origen isquémico que recibieron revascularización coronaria precoz. Dividimos a los pacientes en 2 grupos: mayores de 75 anos (grupo A) y menores (grupo B), y comparamos la evolución durante el ingreso y en un seguimiento máximo de 4 años. El objetivo principal fue estimar la mortalidad a los 4 años. El objetivo secundario se definió como la mortalidad intrahospitalaria. Resultados: Incluimos a 97 pacientes, 44 del grupo A (45%). Los pacientes del grupo B eran con más frecuencia varones (81 vs. 57%, p = 0.014), diabéticos (49 vs. 21%, p: 0.006) y fumadores (39.6 vs. 4.5%, p < 0.05). La mortalidad hospitalaria fue superior en el grupo A (54.5 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.022). El objetivo principal ocurrió en 32 pacientes del grupo A frente a 20 del grupo B (73 vs. 38%, p = 0.007). Conclusión: El choque cardiogénico de origen isquémico en paciente mayores de 75 anos presenta una alta mortalidad durante la estancia hospitalaria y en el seguimiento a largo plazo.
Objective: To compare the prognosis during hospitalization and maximum follow-up of 4 years in patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. Method: Prospective observational study practiced in a coronary Care Unit managed by cardiologists. We included patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock who received early coronary revascularization. Patients were divided into two groups: older than 75 years (group A) and lower (group B), and we compared the evolution during hospitalization and maximum follow-up of 4 years. Primary end point was mortality rate in the maximum follow-up of 4years. Secondary end point was mortality rate during hospitalization. Results: Ninety-seven patients were included, 45% Group A. Patients of Group B were mostly men (81% vs. 57%; P =.014), diabetics (48% vs. 21%; P = 0.006), and smokers (39.6% vs. 5%). Mortality rate during hospitalization was higher in Group A (54.5%) vs. 30.2% in Group B(P = .022). Mortality rate during follow-up (primary variable) was 73% in Group A vs. 38% in Group B (P =.007). Conclusions: Myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock in elderly patients is an entity with high mortality during hospitalization and continues to worsen during long term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Age Factors , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 79 años que ingresa en el servicio de Cardiología tras acudir a Urgencias con síntomas sugerentes de un síndrome coronario agudo, llegando a un diagnóstico cada vez más frecuente y quizá infradiagnosticado años atrás. El Síndrome de Takotsubo es una entidad clínica predominante en mujeres postmenopáusicas y se presenta típicamente tras un estrés físico o psíquico intenso. El cuadro clínico remeda el de un síndrome coronario agudo, sin embargo es característica la ausencia de lesiones angiográficas coronarias y un patrón ecocardiográfico de "balonización" del ventrículo izquierdo por hipercontractilidad de los segmentos basales y discinesia apical. Estas alteraciones suelen recuperarse completamente en el transcurso de unas semanas. Exponemos además una pequeña revisión sobre el estado actual del diagnóstico y tratamiento (AU)
We report a case of a 79 year old woman admitted to our Cardiology department for symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome, eventually reaching an increasingly common diagnosis of a syndrome that was perhaps under-diagnosed in previous years. Takotsubo syndrome is a clinical entity predominantly occurring in postmenopausal women typically after severe physical or psychological stress. The symptoms mimic an acute coronary syndrome, however the absence of coronary angiographic lesions and an echocardiographic pattern of "apical ballooning" in the left ventricle because of hyperkinesis of the basal segments and apical dyskinesia are characteristic of this syndrome. These symptoms are usually fully resolved within a few weeks. We also present a brief review of the current state of its diagnosis and treatment (AU)
