Zone of proximal development (ZPD) as an ability to play in psychotherapy: a theory-building case study of very brief therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This theory-building case study examined the zone of proximal development (ZPD) in psychotherapy within the assimilation model. Theoretically, the ZPD is the segment of the continuum of therapeutic development within which assimilation of problematic experiences can take place. Work within a problem's current ZPD may be manifested as a Winnicottian ability to play, that is, an ability to adopt a flexible reflexive stance to the presenting problem and be involved in joint examination of possible alternatives. Play may be recognized in the client's receptivity to and creative use of the therapist's formulations of the presenting problems. DESIGN AND METHODS: A case was selected from a comparative clinical trial of two very brief psychotherapies for mild to moderate depression, the Two-Plus-One Project (Barkham, Shapiro, Hardy, & Rees, 1999, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 67, 201). Martha, a woman in her late forties, received two sessions of psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy 1 week apart and a follow-up ('plus one') session approximately 3 months later. Dialogical sequence analysis was used to analyse the transcripts of the three sessions. RESULTS: The analysis revealed Martha's problematic action pattern, which remained unchanged throughout the three sessions. Her ability to use and elaborate the therapist's formulations depended on the referential object that the therapist addressed; in particular, she seemed unable to play with the therapist's formulations of her more problematic experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The case helped elucidate how the ZPD is content dependent. Winnicott's conception of playing emphasizes the quality of client response as an indicator of this content sensitivity. Differing breadths of major problems' ZPD, manifested as differing abilities to play with therapists' formulations may explain why some clients improve in psychotherapy while some do not. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Accessing very problematic content may be very difficult even though the client's ability to mentalize other material appears ordinary. Mildly depressed clients who have developed powerful care-taking coping strategies may not respond to very brief therapeutic interventions. A client's minimal acknowledgements may mislead the therapist into supplementing the client's failing self-reflection rather than addressing the issue that provokes this failure.

Helpful aspects of bereavement support for adults following an expected death: volunteers' and bereaved people's perspectives.

Helpful and unhelpful aspects of bereavement support were investigated from the perspectives of 24 bereaved adults and their volunteer bereavement support workers. Most commonly reported themes were the provision of hope and reassurance, and the opportunity for continued sharing and support. Significantly more clients than volunteers reported provision of information, and talking to someone outside their social network as helpful, and both groups scored higher on helpfulness ratings than comparative groups of psychotherapists and clients. Clients' grieving styles and the quality of the helping relationship were also related to what was seen as helpful.

Rupture resolution in cognitive analytic therapy for adolescents with borderline personality disorder.

BACKGROUND: Ruptures are potential change events in therapy that might result in positive or negative consequences for the therapeutic alliance and outcome. Alliance ruptures and premature drop-out are common with clients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, limiting treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To test a nine stage model of rupture resolution in cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) with adolescents. METHOD: The validation phase of task analysis was employed to test the rupture resolution model and to relate handling of ruptures to outcome using quantitative and qualitative analysis of transcripts. Eighteen ruptures and resolution attempts were intensively examined across three good and two poor outcome sessions, as rated by clients. The number of model stages employed by therapists was related to outcome. RESULTS: Sessions evaluated as poor or good by clients could be distinguished according to the extent to which therapists used model stages. Treatment outcome was significantly associated with number of model stages included by therapists. CONCLUSION: Competent resolution of ruptures in CAT is dependent on therapists' inclusion of stages of the model, providing validation for the model, and demonstrating that effective rupture resolution might be related to treatment outcome. Ruptures and their resolution are likely to be key events in psychotherapy process.

Alliance ruptures and rupture resolution in cognitive-behavior therapy: a preliminary task analysis.

An initial ideal, rational model of alliance rupture and rupture resolution provided by cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) experts was assessed and compared with empirical observations of ruptures and their resolution in two cases of successful CBT. The initial rational model emphasized nondefensive acknowledgment and exploration of the rupture. Results indicated differences between what therapists think they should do to resolve ruptures and what they actually do and suggested that the rational model should be expanded to emphasize client validation and empowerment. Therapists' ability to attend to ruptures emerged as an important clinical skill.