Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Neurol ; 42(6): 404-8, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20472191

ABSTRACT

In this retrospective cohort study, a clinical and administrative database of children hospitalized at Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2006, was used to identify those with laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infections and at least one seizure. In all, 59 children were identified, 34 of whom (58%) had no other potential medical explanation for their seizures. Of these 34 children, 23 (68%) were afebrile at seizure onset and 11 were febrile. Electroencephalography was performed for 21 of the 34 children (62%); all findings were normal, except for a child with slowing related to cerebral edema. Twenty-six of the 34 children (76%) had neuroimaging studies; all findings were normal, except for the child with cerebral edema and a child with an incidental arachnoid cyst. Twenty of the 34 children (59%) had a lumbar puncture; again, all findings were normal. All 34 children recovered uneventfully, including the 6 children who spent at least 1 day in an intensive care unit. Follow-up data on 27 of these children identified 2 children (7%) who required chronic anticonvulsant therapy. The results indicate that seizures associated with rotavirus infection are a relatively benign neurologic condition in young children. With few exceptions, neurodiagnostic studies do not influence management or outcome.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/complications , Rotavirus Infections/complications , Seizures/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Electroencephalography , Female , Gastroenteritis/virology , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Male , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/virology , Spinal Puncture , Utah
2.
Vaccine ; 21(25-26): 3746-50, 2003 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12922107

ABSTRACT

Since 1966, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recommended tetanus-diphtheria toxoid (Td) be used instead of single antigen tetanus toxoid (TT) because, while both vaccines protect against tetanus, only Td protects against diphtheria. Despite this recommendation, approximately 2.5 million doses of TT were distributed annually from 1991 to 1997. One possible explanation for the continued use of TT is concern about the relative safety of Td. Small clinical trials found Td to be associated with a higher rate of local vaccine-associated adverse events (VAEs) than TT. To determine if the findings from the trials would hold up on a larger scale, we compared the rate of reporting to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive reporting system, after either vaccine from 1991 to 1997. There were 40 reports per million doses of Td, and 27 reports per million doses of TT, for a reporting rate ratio of 1.4. Reporting rates to VAERS are lower than the rates of VAEs identified in the clinical trials, but the magnitude of the difference in VAEs following TT versus Td is similar. While reporting rates are lower after TT than Td, rates of reported VAEs after both vaccines are low.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine/adverse effects , Tetanus Toxoid/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...