Effect of Work: Rest Ratio on Cycling Performance Following Sprint Interval Training: A Randomized Control Trial.

Lloyd Jones, MC, Morris, MG, and Jakeman, JR. Effect of work: Rest ratio on cycling performance following sprint interval training: A randomized control trial. J Strength Cond Res 33(12): 3263-3268, 2019-Sprint interval training (SIT) has been shown to improve performance measures in a range of individuals, and it is understood that different responses can be elicited from different training protocols. However, consideration of changes in work to rest ratios could offer important insight into optimizing training programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 3 different work to rest ratios on exercise performance. Thirty-six male and female subjects were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 training groups or a nontraining control group. Training consisted of 10 × 6 second "all-out" sprints on a cycle ergometer, with a 1:8, 1:10, or 1:12 work-to-rest ratio. Performance data, including peak power output, performance decrement, and 10-km time trial performance data were collected before and after 2 weeks of SIT. There were significant (p ≤ 0.05) improvements in all parameters for the training groups, but no changes were observed in the control condition. Peak power increased by 57.2, 50.7, and 53.7 W in the 1:8, 1:10 and 1:12 groups, respectively, with no significant differences in response between conditions. Time trial performance improved significantly in all 3 training conditions (29.4, 8.7, and 25.1 seconds in the 1:8, 1:10, and 1:12 groups), while worsening in the control group. All training conditions resulted in significant improvements in performance, but there were no significant differences in improvement for any of the groups. Any of the 3 stated that work to rest ratios would be appropriate for use with athletes and allow some level of personal preference for those interested in using the protocol.

Impact of time and work:rest ratio matched sprint interval training programmes on performance: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of a short training intervention using two repeated sprint protocols matched for total sprint duration and work:rest ratio. DESIGN: Randomised-controlled trial. METHODS: Thirty physically active males were randomly allocated to one of two sprint training groups: a 6s group, a 30s group or a non-exercising control. The training groups were matched for work:rest ratio and total sprint time per session, and completed 6 training sessions over a 2-week period. Before and after the 2 week training period, participants completed a VO2max test and a 10km time trial on a cycle ergometer. RESULTS: Time trial performance increased significantly by 5.1% in 6s (630±115s to 598±92s; p<0.05) and 6.2% in 30s (579±68s to 543±85s; p<0.05) from baseline testing, but there was no significant change in the control group (p>0.05), and no significant difference between exercise groups (p>0.05). The 6s group increased peak power output by 9.0% (from 1092±263W to 1181±248W; p<0.05) from sprint session 1 to 6, and the 30s group by 20.0% (1041±161W to 1237±159W; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that both 6 and 30s bouts of repeated sprint exercise, matched for total sprint duration and W:R can improve athletic performance.