ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Determining the BRAF mutation status of patients with advanced metastatic melanoma is essential in order to assess patients' eligibility for targeted BRAF inhibitor therapy. The aim of this study was to validate the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) to rapidly obtain the BRAF status in the UK cancer centre setting. METHODS: All samples sent for molecular testing for detection of the BRAF mutation over a 26-month period were prospectively tested using the VE1 monoclonal antibody IHC stain. RESULTS: Two-hundred and nineteen samples from 214 patients were identified. All patients were AJCC stage III/IV, except one. There was an overall 95.0% (208/219) concordance rate, with a sensitivity of 94.4% (84/89) and a specificity of 95.4% (124/130) when using genomic assays as the gold standard. Discordance resulted from the inability of the molecular technique to detect the V600E2 mutation and an inability of the IHC staining technique to detect non-V600E mutations. Molecular testing on smaller tumour deposits was also unreliable. CONCLUSIONS: IHC staining has good sensitivity and excellent specificity for BRAF V600E mutations. BRAF IHC can be incorporated into a BRAF mutation testing algorithm for UK cancer centres to as a feasible first-line assay and identify a subset of cases that require subsequent genomic testing. It has the additional major advantages of reduced cost and rapid turnaround time.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Melanoma/genetics , Mutation , Neoplasm Metastasis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Melanoma/pathology , United KingdomABSTRACT
Medical photographs are used in many clinical settings; however, there are significant risks associated with using the camera feature on mobile devices, namely, breaches of security. PicSafe Medi is an app that allows healthcare professionals to take clinical photographs using smart devices whilst addressing the concerns of patient confidentiality. We review the app to assess its functionality in a UK clinical setting, taking into account UK guidelines such as those offered by the General Medical Council, UK legislation, the Institute of Medical Illustrators and the Department of Health.
