Green dialysate and gallbladder perforation in a peritoneal dialysis patients: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder perforation is a rare but lethal condition and its diagnosis is usually difficult and delayed. Frequently, gallbladder rupture is associated with cholecystitis, but spontaneous perforation was ever described. However, spontaneous rupture of gallbladder has never been reported in patients underwent peritoneal dialysis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 62-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain for 2 days to clinic. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis was diagnosed initially. It was followed by spontaneous gallbladder perforation with greenish dialysate. The patient was managed successfully by antibiotic treatment and primary closure of gallbladder perforation with external drainage. He recovered from this critical condition and stayed on dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention yields a good prognosis in PD patients with gallbladder perforation. Surgical intervention and antibiotic treatment are the mainstay of treatment. Both of them should take place promptly.

Endoscopic hemoclip versus triclip placement in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Hemoclip placement is an effective endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding. Triclip is a novel clipping device with three prongs over the distal end. So far, there is no clinical study concerning the hemostatic effect of triclip placement. AIM: To determine the hemostatic effect of the triclip as compared with that of the hemoclip. METHODS: A total of 100 peptic ulcer patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels received endoscopic therapy with either hemoclip (N = 50) or triclip placement (N = 50). After obtaining initial hemostasis, they received omeprazole 40 mg intravenous infusion every 12 h for 3 days. The main outcome assessment was hemostatic rate and rebleeding rate at 14 days. RESULTS: Initial hemostasis was obtained in 47 patients (94%) of the hemoclip group and in 38 patients (76%) of the triclip group (P= 0.011). Rebleeding episodes, volume of blood transfusion, the hospital stay, numbers of patients requiring urgent operation, and mortality were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Hemoclip is superior to triclip in obtaining primary hemostasis in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. In bleeders located over difficult-to-approach sites, hemoclip is more ideal than triclip.

Effects of 3-day IV pantoprazole versus omeprazole on 24-hour intragastric acidity at 3 days in Chinese patients with duodenal ulcer: A single-center, prospective, randomized, comparative, pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Pantoprazole and omeprazole are irreversible proton pump inhibitors that have been found to significantly reduce intragastric acidity in patients with peptic ulcer and/or esophagitis. It has been reported that gastric acid secretion is lower in the Chinese patients compared with the Western population. Based on a MEDLINE search, no studies of the treatment of intragastric acidity with IV pantoprazole have been conducted in the Chinese population to date. OBJECTIVE: This trial was performed to compare the effects of IV pantoprazole versus omeprazole on 24-hour intragastric acidity in Chinese patients with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, pilot study was conducted at the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Chinese patients aged 18 to 80 years with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer were randomly assigned to receive a continuous IV infusion of pantoprazole or omeprazole 160 mg/d for 3 days. On days 4 to 14, patients received pantoprazole 40 mg/d or omeprazole 20 mg/d orally. During endoscopic examination at enrollment, an antral biopsy specimen was obtained for rapid urease test, with each patient's agreement, by a blinded investigator. The primary end point was 24-hour intragastric pH on day 3. Secondary end points were percentage of the total time during the 24-hour period (%t) pH <3 and <4 and proportions of patients with healed ulcers on day-14 endoscopy. Endoscopic examination for monitoring of adverse effects of both drugs was repeated 8 weeks after study completion. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled (35 men, 5 women; mean age, 63.3 years; 20 per treatment group). Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH was not significantly different between the omeprazole and pantoprazole groups (mean [SD], 6.61 [1.27] vs 6.84 [0.78]). The %t pH <3 (mean [SD], 8.01% [19.60%] vs 2.70% [7.18%]) and pH <4 (mean [SD], 9.28% [21.41%] vs 3.87% [9.79%]) were not significantly different between the omeprazole and pantoprazole groups. On day-14 endoscopy, ulcers were found to be healed in 3 (15%) patients in each group. In the omeprazole group, 1 (5%) patient experienced mild diarrhea, and 1 (5%) experienced mild abdominal fullness. These adverse effects were considered treatment related. No adverse effects were reported in either treatment group at 8 weeks after the study. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study of 3-day treatment with a continuous IV infusion of pantoprazole or omeprazole 160 mg/d found that these 2 treatments had similar effects on 24-hour intragastric pH in this small population of Chinese patients with duodenal ulcer. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Role of intravenous omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection: a prospective randomized comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine injection is the most common endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding. Controversy exists concerning the optimal dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after successful endoscopic therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal dose of PPI after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS: A total of 200 peptic ulcer patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels (NBVV) who had obtained initial hemostasis with endoscopic injection of epinephrine were randomized to receive omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 6 h, omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 12 h or cimetidine (CIM) 400 mg infusion every 12 h. Outcomes were checked at 14 days after enrollment. RESULTS: Rebleeding episodes were fewer in the group with omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 6 h (6/67, 9%) as compared with that of the CIM infusion group (22/67, 32.8%, p < 0.01). The volume of blood transfusion was less in the group with omeprazole 40 mg every 6 h than in those groups with omepraole 40 mg infusion every 12 h (p= 0.001) and CIM 400 mg infusion every 12 h (p < 0.001). The hospital stay, number of patients requiring urgent operation, and death rate were not statistically different among the three groups. CONCLUSION: A combination of endoscopic epinephrine injection and a large dose of omeprazole infusion is superior to combined endoscopic epinephrine injection with CIM infusion for preventing recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcers with active bleeding or NBVV.

Mucosal polymerase chain reaction for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.

AIM: Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) has been linked to chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric cancer and MALT-lymphoma. Conventional invasive tests are less sensitive than non-invasive tests in diagnosing H pylori infection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. Polymerase chain reaction is a sensitive and accurate method for diagnosing H pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic role of mucosal polymerase chain reaction for H pylori infection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS: In patients with bleeding, non-bleeding peptic ulcers and chronic gastritis, we checked rapid urease test, histology, bacterial culture and mucosal polymerase chain reaction for detecting H pylori infection. Positive H pylori infection was defined as positive culture or both a positive histology and a positive rapid urease test. For mucosal polymerase chain reaction of H pylori, we checked vacA (s1a, s1b, s1c, s2, m1, m1T, m2), iceA1, iceA2 and cag A. RESULTS: Between October 2000 and April 2002, 88 patients with bleeding peptic ulcers (males/females: 60/28, gastric ulcers/duodenal ulcers: 55/33), 81 patients with non-bleeding peptic ulcers (males/females: 54/27, gastric ulcers/duodenal ulcers: 45/36) and 37 patients with chronic gastritis (males/females: 24/13) were enrolled in this study. In patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, non-bleeding peptic ulcers and chronic gastritis, 45 patients (51%), 71 patients (88%) and 20 patients (54%) respectively were found to have positive H pylori infection (P<0.001). In patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, non-bleeding peptic ulcers and chronic gastritis, polymerase chain reaction for H pylori infection was positive in 54 patients (61%), 70 patients (86%) and 20 patients (54%) respectively (P<0.001). The sensitivity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of mucosal polymerase reaction for H pylori infection were significantly lower in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers (84%, 79% and 81%) than in patients with non-bleeding peptic ulcers (99%, 99% and 98%) (P<0.001, P<0.01 and P<0.001 respectively). The sensitivity, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of mucosal polymerase reaction for H pylori were significantly lower in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers (84%, 83% and 81%) than in patients with chronic gastritis (100%, 100% and 100%) (P = 0.02, P = 0.02 and P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Mucosal polymerase chain reaction for detecting H pylori infection is not reliable in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.

Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori has been linked to chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Invasive tests are less sensitive than noninvasive tests in diagnosing H. pylori infection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. The H. pylori stool antigen test has been useful in diagnosing H. pylori in patients with peptic ulcers before and after eradication of H. pylori. The aim of this study was to evaluate the H. pylori stool antigen test in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS: Patients with bleeding and nonbleeding peptic ulcers underwent a rapid urease test, histology, bacterial culture and H. pylori stool antigen test. Positive H. pylori infection was defined as a positive culture or both a positive histology and a positive rapid urease test. Helicobacter pylori stool antigen was assessed with a commercial kit (Diagnostec H. pylori antigen EIA Kit, Hong Kong). RESULTS: Between October 2000 and April 2002, 93 patients with bleeding peptic ulcers (men/women: 78/15, gastric ulcer/duodenal ulcer: 58/35) and 59 patients with nonbleeding peptic ulcers (men/women: 47/12, gastric ulcer/duodenal ulcer: 30/29) were enrolled in this study. Forty-seven (50.5%) patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and 30 (50.8%) patients with nonbleeding peptic ulcers, were found to be infected with H. pylori (p > .1). Helicobacter pylori stool antigen tests were positive in 54 (58.1%) and 30 (50.8%) patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and nonbleeding peptic ulcers, respectively (p > .1). The sensitivity (82% vs. 93%), specificity (68% vs. 93%), positive predictive value (74% vs. 93%), negative predictive value (77% vs. 93%) and diagnostic accuracy (75% vs. 93%) were all lower in patients with bleeding vs. nonbleeding peptic ulcers. The specificity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the H. pylori stool antigen test in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers were significantly lower than those in patients with nonbleeding peptic ulcers (p = .01, p = .02 and p = .003, respectively). CONCLUSION: The H. pylori stool antigen test is not reliable for diagnosing H. pylori infection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.

Helicobacter pylori cagA, iceA and vacA genotypes in patients with gastric cancer in Taiwan.

AIM: Helicobacter pylori (H pylori ) has been linked to chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and MALT-lymphoma. The link of genotypes of H pylori to gastric cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the H pylori vacA alleles, cagA and iceA in patients with gastric cancer in Taiwan. METHODS: Patients with gastric cancer, peptic ulcer and chronic gastritis were enrolled in this study. We obtained biopsy specimens from the stomach at least 2 cm away from the tumor margin in patients with gastric cancer, and from the antrum of stomach in patients with peptic ulcer or chronic gastritis. DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction were used to detect the presence or absence of cagA and to assess the polymorphism of vacA and iceA. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients (gastric ulcer: 77, duodenal ulcer: 66, and chronic gastritis: 25) were found to have positive PCR results of the biopsy specimens from patients with peptic ulcer and chronic gastritis. We found positive cagA (139/168, 83%), m2 (84/168, 50%) and iceA1 (125/168, 74%) strains in the majority of patients. In patients with gastric cancer, the vacA s1a and s1c subtypes were less commonly found than those in non-cancer patients (35/66 vs 127/168, P = 0.0001 for s1a and 13/66 vs 93/168, P<0.0001 for s1c). In the middle region, the m1T strain in patients with gastric cancer was more than that of non-cancer patients (23/66 vs 33/168, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In Taiwan, H pylori with positive vacA s1a, cagA and iceA1 strains are found in the majority of patients with gastric cancer or non-cancer patients. In patients with gastric cancer, the vacA s1a and s1c subtypes are less and m1T is more than in patients with peptic ulcer and chronic gastritis.

Poor responders to intravenous omeprazole in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although proton pump inhibitors are highly effective in raising intragastric pH, there still remains a small group of patients who resist acid suppression. A high dose of omeprazole has been shown to reduce rebleeding rate in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after endoscopic therapy. The primary objective of this study was to assess the incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding patients who were resistant to intravenous omeprazole. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between intragastric pH and rebleeding rate in studied patients after successful endoscopic therapy. METHODOLOGY: Between Oct. 1996 and Aug. 1999, 88 bleeding peptic ulcer patients who had obtained initial hemostasis with endoscopic therapy were enrolled in this study. In these patients, 40 mg of omeprazole was given as intravenous bolus followed by 40 mg intravenously every 6 h for 3 days. Thereafter, omeprazole was given 20 mg orally once daily for 2 months. The intragastric pH was recorded for 24 hours after the first dose of omeprazole. The occurrence of rebleeding was observed for 14 days. RESULTS: The mean intragastric pH value of these 88 patients was 6.07, (95% CI: 5.91-6.23). Four patients (5%) were found to have omeprazole resistance (pH < 4.0, 50% of the time). By the 3rd days after entering the study, more patients with a mean pH < 6 rebled (5/25 vs. 3/63, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: About five percent of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding respond poorly to intravenous omeprazole. Rebleeding rate is higher in patients with a mean intragastric pH of less than 6.

Genotypes of Helicobacter pylori in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.

AIM: Helicobacter pylori causes chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and MALT-lymphoma. Different genotypes of Helicobacter pylori are confirmed from diverse geographic areas. Its association with bleeding peptic ulcer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the Helicobacter pylori vacA alleles, cagA and iceA in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. METHODS: We enrolled patients with bleeding, non-bleeding peptic ulcers and chronic gastritis. Biopsy specimens were obtained from the antrum of the stomach for rapid urease test, bacterial culture and PCR assay. DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction were used to detect the presence or absence of cagA and to assess the polymorphism of vacA and iceA. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients (60.4%) (25 patients with chronic gastritis, 26 patients with bleeding gastric ulcer, 51 patients with non-bleeding gastric ulcer, 26 patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer, and 40 patients with non-bleeding duodenal ulcer) were found to have positive PCR results between January 2001 and December 2002. Concerning genotypes, we found cagA (139/278, 50%), vacA s1a (127/278, 45.7%), and ice A1 (125/278, 45%) predominated in all studied patients. In patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, vacA s1a and m1T were fewer than those in patients with non-bleeding peptic ulcers (37/106 vs 69/135, P=0.017, and 4/106 vs 21/135, P =0.002). CONCLUSION: In patients with peptic ulcers, H pylori vacA s1a and m1T prevent bleeding complication.

Surgical resection of duodenal lymphangiectasia: a case report.

Intestinal lymphangiectasia, characterized by dilatation of intestinal lacteals, is rare. The major treatment for primary intestinal lymphangiectasia is dietary modification. Surgery to relieve symptoms and to clarify the etiology should be considered when medical treatment failed. This article reports a 49-year-old woman of solitary duodenal lymphangiectasia, who presented with epigastralgia and anemia. Her symptoms persisted with medical treatment. Surgery was finally performed to relieve the symptoms and to exclude the existence of underlying etiologies, with satisfactory effect. In conclusion, duodenal lymphangiectasia can present clinically as epigastralgia and chronic blood loss. Surgical resection may be resorted to relieve pain, control bleeding, and exclude underlying diseases in some patients.