Ligilactobacillus salivarius PS11610 exerts an effect on the microbial and immunological profile of couples suffering unknown infertility.

PROBLEM: Unknown or idiopathic infertility has been associated with urogenital tract dysbiosis, reducing pregnancy and delivery ratios during assisted reproductive treatments (ART). The Ligilactobacillus salivarius PS11610 strain has shown extraordinary antimicrobial activity in vitro against urogenital pathogens as well as other probiotic characteristics. Therefore, an intervention study was performed to evaluate the effect of L. salivarius PS11610 on the microbial composition of urogenital tract in infertile couples with bacterial dysbiosis. METHOD OF STUDY: Seventeen couples undergoing ART diagnosed with unknown infertility were selected. After confirming urogenital dysbiosis, they started a 6-month treatment with L. salivarius PS11610 (1 dose/12 h for female and 1 dose/24 h for male). Vaginal, seminal, glans, uterine and plasma samples were collected for determination of the microbiome and immune profile at the beginning and the end of the treatment. RESULTS: Supplementation with L. salivarius PS11610 significantly modified the urogenital microbiome composition in male and female samples, solving dysbiosis of 67% of the couples. Pathogens disappeared from the vaginal samples whereas Lactobacilli percentage increased after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Moreover, L. salivarius PS11610 changed the uterine microbiome that could be associated with a change of the uterine immune profile. Additionally, the probiotic intake could be associated with the observed change in the systemic immunological profile of couples. Finally, the pregnant and delivery ratio were improved. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic supplementation with L. salivarius PS11610 improved the male and female urogenital tract microbiome, modulating the immune system and increasing pregnancy success in couples undergoing ART.

Use of steroid pre-treatments in IVF-ICSI cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol and their impact on gestational outcomes.

Different steroid pre-treatments have been used to schedule the start of the ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles. Currently, there is controversy about their effects on gestational outcomes. We designed a three-armed randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eighty-six normoresponder patients undergoing IVF treatment with antagonist GnRH protocol were allocated to three different groups. In the group 1, 34 patients received oral contraceptive pill (OCP) from the first day of the cycle to five days before starting ovarian stimulation, in the group 2, 25 patients received 2 mg/12 hours of oral E2 valerate from day 25 of the previous cycle until the day before starting stimulation, and finally, in the group 3, 27 patients did not receive any treatment. There are no statistically significant differences neither in clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (40.9% OCP vs. 28.6% E2 vs. 53.3% no treatment group, p=.388) nor live birth rate (LBR) (31.8% OCP vs. 28.6% E2 vs. 46.7% no treatment group, p=.537) between groups in fresh embryo transfer. Likewise, no differences were found in the cumulative CPR, nor in cumulative LBR. However, there is a tendency to worst outcomes in the E2 group. In this E2 group, we observed better results with longer exposition, although no significant differences are reached (E2 mean days in the pregnant group 8.29 vs. 6.83 in the non-pregnant group, p=.08). Our study shows no significant differences in pregnancy rates between groups, but the E2 group is trending at worse gestational results. Trial registration number: Eudra-CT registration number is 2014-001809-40.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Nowadays, there is much controversy about how pregnancy rates could be affected by the selection of steroid pre-treatments used in order to schedule IVF cycles. However, these treatments are widely utilised in clinical practice.What the results of this study add? The results support the clinical findings of most of the studies previously published. No significant differences in gestational outcomes were found between the groups treated with steroid pre-treatments and the control group. Additionally, oestrogen pre-treatment seems to be related to better pregnancy outcomes when the exposition is longer. Thus, an earlier start of this treatment in the luteal phase could be the optimal approach.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study pretends to provide clarity about the treatment guidelines of steroid pre-treatments to schedule the clinical work without impact on gestational outcomes.

Effects of progesterone variation on IVF Progesterone variation during controlled ovarian stimulation: effects on in vitro results.

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the progesterone variation (PV) between early progesterone and preovulatory progesterone on pregnancy rate (PR), number of oocytes, and embryo quality. Three hundred and thirty-eight cycles of in vitro fertilisation were included and progesterone was measured on 5th day of stimulation GnRH as well as on the day of induction of ovulation. Fresh embryo transfer (ET) on the second-third day after follicular puncture was made in 152/338 cycles, with positive pregnancies in 61/152 (40%). In the cycles in which ET was cancelled (186/338) higher levels of estradiol and P2 were detected, as well as greater PV and number of oocytes obtained than those made in with fresh transfer. A greater PV was not associated with a worse clinical PR but with a minor embryo quality in the group of 35-37 years old patients.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Preovulatory progesterone (P2) elevation has been linked to worse results in IVF cycles. It has also been described been reported that there is a lower pregnancy rate (PR) in patients with high progesterone in the early follicular phase (P1). In our study, we measured P1 and P2 to evaluate the possible repercussion of progesterone variation (PV) (ratio of P2 to P1) on PR, a variable that has not previously been analysed.What do the results of this study add? Negative correlation between preovulatory progesterone and embryo quality was found, according to the literature. In the present study, a negative significant correlation between PV and embryo quality was also found, however, only in the group of 35-37 years old women.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This could indicate that a rapid increase in progesterone levels after the early follicular phase is related to a lower quality of the obtained embryos, although further studies are required to achieve greater statistical significance.