Manejo perioperatorio y periprocedimiento del tratamiento antitrombótico: documento de consenso de SEC, SEDAR, SEACV, SECTCV, AEC, SECPRE, SEPD, SEGO, SEHH, SETH, SEMERGEN, SEMFYC, SEMG, SEMICYUC, SEMI, SEMES, SEPAR, SENEC, SEO, SEPA, SERVEI, SECOT y AEU / Perioperative and periprocedural management of antithrombotic therapy: consensus document of SEC, SEDAR, SEACV, SECTCV, AEC, SECPRE, SEPD, SEGO, SEHH, SETH, SEMERGEN, SEMFYC, SEMG, SEMICYUC, SEMI, SEMES, SEPAR, SENEC, SEO, SEPA, SERVEI, SECOT and AEU

En los últimos años, el número de pacientes anticoagulados y antiagregados está aumentando significativamente. Al ser un tratamiento crónico, es de esperar que a lo largo de su vida necesiten un procedimiento quirúrgico o intervencionista que pueda requerir la interrupción del fármaco antitrombótico. La decisión de retirar o mantener dicho tratamiento estará determinada, por un lado, por el riesgo trombótico y, por otro, por el hemorrágico. De la interacción entre estos 2 factores dependerá la actitud ante la anticoagulación y la antiagregación. El objetivo de este documento de consenso, coordinado desde el Grupo de Trabajo de Trombosis Cardiovascular de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología y certificado por un amplio número de sociedades científicas que participan en el proceso asistencial del paciente durante el periodo perioperatorio o periprocedimiento, consiste en proponer una serie de recomendaciones prácticas y sencillas con el fin de homogeneizar la práctica clínica diaria

During the last few years, the number of patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy has increased worldwide. Since this is a chronic treatment, patients receiving it can be expected to need some kind of surgery or intervention during their lifetime that may require treatment discontinuation. The decision to withdraw antithrombotic therapy depends on the patient's thrombotic risk versus hemorrhagic risk. Assessment of both factors will show the precise management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in these scenarios. The aim of this consensus document, coordinated by the Cardiovascular Thrombosis Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and endorsed by most of the Spanish scientific societies of clinical specialities that may play a role in the patient-health care process during the perioperative or periprocedural period, is to recommend some simple and practical guidelines with a view to homogenizing daily clinical practice

Perioperative and Periprocedural Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: Consensus Document of SEC, SEDAR, SEACV, SECTCV, AEC, SECPRE, SEPD, SEGO, SEHH, SETH, SEMERGEN, SEMFYC, SEMG, SEMICYUC, SEMI, SEMES, SEPAR, SENEC, SEO, SEPA, SERVEI, SECOT and AEU.

During the last few years, the number of patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy has increased worldwide. Since this is a chronic treatment, patients receiving it can be expected to need some kind of surgery or intervention during their lifetime that may require treatment discontinuation. The decision to withdraw antithrombotic therapy depends on the patient's thrombotic risk versus hemorrhagic risk. Assessment of both factors will show the precise management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in these scenarios. The aim of this consensus document, coordinated by the Cardiovascular Thrombosis Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and endorsed by most of the Spanish scientific societies of clinical specialities that may play a role in the patient-health care process during the perioperative or periprocedural period, is to recommend some simple and practical guidelines with a view to homogenizing daily clinical practice.

Perception of Patients Regarding Burdens and Benefits of Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Achieving a good satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment should be a target in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the perception of patients regarding burdens and benefits of anticoagulation with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA). METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional/retrospective study conducted throughout Spain, in which AF patients taking VKA during the last year, attended at primary care setting were included. The Anti-Clot-Treatment Scale (ACTS) was used to determine perceived burdens and benefits with anticoagulation. RESULTS: Overall, 1,386 patients (mean age 77.4 ± 8.7 years; 48.6% women; 64.2% permanent AF; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.9 ± 1.5; HAS-BLED 1.6 ± 0.9) were analyzed. The adequate anticoagulation control was achieved by 56.9/60.6% of patients according to direct method/Rosendaal method, respectively. Overall, mean ACTS Burdens scale score was 49.4 ± 8.8 and mean ACTS Benefits scale score 11.2 ± 2.2. Active patients, polymedication, elderly and visits to the nurse were associated with higher scores in the ACTS Burdens scale (lower perceived burden), whereas visits to the emergency department and primary care physician were associated with lower scores in the ACTS Burdens scale (higher perceived burden). Active patients, number of INR determinations, visits to the nurse, and an adequate INR control were associated with higher scores in the ACTS Benefits scale (higher perceived benefit), whereas visits to the emergency department and to the primary care physician were associated with lower scores in the ACTS Benefits scale (lower perceived benefit). CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with treatment was high among patients with AF chronically anticoagulated with VKA, suggesting that quality of life is not impaired in this population.

Blood pressure control in anticoagulated patients with hypertension and atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical profile and blood pressure (BP) control rates of anticoagulated patients with hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: The PAULA study was a multicenter cross-sectional/retrospective observational study conducted throughout Spain. The study included patients with nonvalvular AF who were receiving vitamin K antagonist therapy during the past year and were attended at primary care setting. Adequate BP control was defined according to 2013 ESC/ESH guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 1,222 hypertensive patients were included (mean age 77.9 ± 8.3 years; 51.2% women; CHADS2 2.5 ± 1.1; CHA2DS2-VASc 4.2 ± 1.4; HAS-BLED 1.6 ± 0.9). 33.5% of patients had diabetes, 24.9% heart failure and 14.0% prior stroke/transient ischemic attack. Mean BP was 131.4 ± 14.5/74.9 ± 9.8 mm Hg. With regard to antihypertensive treatment, most of patients were on combined therapy (67.9%). The commonest prescribed antihypertensive drugs were diuretics (64.4%), followed by angiotensin receptor blockers (30.1%), and beta blockers (29.4%). 75.2% of hypertensive patients achieved BP control targets; 86.6% of patients ≥80 years and 67.6% of diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: More than 75% of hypertensive patients with AF achieved BP goals, and this rate was higher in elderly. More than 2 thirds of patients were on combined therapy. BP control appears to be better in AF patients than in general hypertensive population.

Documento de consenso del uso clínico de la Polypill en la prevención secundaria del riesgo cardiovascular / Consensus document for the use of the Polypill in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

La enfermedad cardiovascular suele estar en fase avanzada cuando aparecen los primeros síntomas. El hecho de que la presentación clínica inicial pueda ser letal o altamente incapacitante enfatiza la necesidad de la prevención primaria y secundaria. Se estima que la proporción de pacientes con buena adherencia en prevención secundaria de la enfermedad cardiovascular es baja y disminuye progresivamente en el tiempo. La Polypill para la prevención cardiovascular secundaria es el primer tratamiento combinado en dosis fija de ácido acetilsalicílico, atorvastatina y ramipril aprobada en España. El propósito de este documento de consenso fue definir y recomendar, a través de la evidencia en la literatura y la opinión clínica de expertos, el impacto de la adherencia al tratamiento de prevención cardiovascular secundaria y el uso en la práctica clínica de la Polypill integrado en una estrategia global que incluye modificaciones en el estilo de vida. Para la realización de este consenso se ha utilizado la metodología RAND/UCLA que está basada en la evidencia científica y en el juicio colectivo y experiencia clínica de un panel de expertos. Como resultado se ha elaborado un informe final de recomendaciones sobre el impacto de la falta de adherencia al tratamiento de la prevención cardiovascular secundaria y el efecto del uso de una Polypill en la adherencia terapéutica de los pacientes. Las recomendaciones de este documento se orientan a todos aquellos especialistas, cardiólogos, médicos internistas y médicos de atención primaria con competencia en la prescripción y seguimiento de los pacientes de alto y muy alto riesgo cardiovascular y que requieran prevención secundaria (AU)

Cardiovascular disease is a chronic disorder which is usually already at an advanced stage when the first symptoms develop. The fact that the initial clinical presentation can be lethal or highly incapacitating emphasizes the need for primary and secondary prevention. It is estimated that the ratio of patients with good adherence to secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is low and also decreases gradually over time. The Polypill for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is the first fixed-dose combination therapy of salicylic acid, atorvastatin and ramipril approved in Spain. The purpose of this consensus document was to define and recommend, through the evidence available in the literature and clinical expert opinion, the impact of treatment adherence in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and the use of the Polypill in daily clinical practice as part of a global strategy including adjustments in patient lifestyle. A RAND/UCLA methodology based on scientific evidence, as well as the collective judgment and clinical expertise of an expert panel was used for this assessment. As a result, a final report of recommendations on the impact of the lack of adherence to treatment of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and the effect of using a Polypill in adherence of patients was produced. The recommendations included in this document have been addressed to all those specialists, cardiologists, internists and primary care physicians with competence in prescribing and monitoring patients with high and very high cardiovascular risks (AU)

Consensus document for the use of the Polypill in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. / Documento de consenso del uso clínico de la Polypill en la prevención secundaria del riesgo cardiovascular.

Cardiovascular disease is a chronic disorder which is usually already at an advanced stage when the first symptoms develop. The fact that the initial clinical presentation can be lethal or highly incapacitating emphasizes the need for primary and secondary prevention. It is estimated that the ratio of patients with good adherence to secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is low and also decreases gradually over time. The Polypill for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is the first fixed-dose combination therapy of salicylic acid, atorvastatin and ramipril approved in Spain. The purpose of this consensus document was to define and recommend, through the evidence available in the literature and clinical expert opinion, the impact of treatment adherence in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and the use of the Polypill in daily clinical practice as part of a global strategy including adjustments in patient lifestyle. A RAND/UCLA methodology based on scientific evidence, as well as the collective judgment and clinical expertise of an expert panel was used for this assessment. As a result, a final report of recommendations on the impact of the lack of adherence to treatment of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and the effect of using a Polypill in adherence of patients was produced. The recommendations included in this document have been addressed to all those specialists, cardiologists, internists and primary care physicians with competence in prescribing and monitoring patients with high and very high cardiovascular risks.

Péptidos natriuréticos: consenso y uso necesarios / Natriuretic peptides: consensus call for use

No disponible

Puntuación SAMe-TT 2R2: ¿es útil en todos los pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular? / SAMe-TT 2R2 Score: Useful in all patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

No disponible

Un paso más allá en la prevención secundaria del riesgo cardiovascular. Documento de consenso del uso clínico del policomprimido / A step ahead in secondary prevention of cardiovascular risk. Consensus document on clinical use of the polypill

No disponible

Grado de control de la anticoagulación en pacientes con fibrilación auricular en España: necesidad de minimizar sesgos y contextualizar resultados. Respuesta de Barrios et al / Degree of anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation in Spain: need to minimize biases and contextualize results. Response Barrios et al

No disponible

Self-administered versus interview-based questionnaires among patients with intermittent claudication: Do they give different results? A cross-sectional study / Questionários autoadministrados versus administrados por entrevistador para pacientes com claudicação intermitente: Os resultados são diferentes? Um estudo transversal

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Many clinical investigations use generic and/or specific questionnaires to obtain information about participants and patients. There is disagreement about whether the administration method can affect the results. The aim here was to determine whether, among patients with intermittent claudication (IC), there are differences in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) scores with regard to: 1) the questionnaire administration method (self-administration versus face-to-face interview); and 2) the type of interviewer (vascular surgeon, VS, versus general practitioner, GP). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional observational multicenter epidemiological study carried out within the Spanish National Health Service. METHODS: 1,641 evaluable patients with IC firstly completed the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires and then were interviewed by their doctor on the same day. Pearson correlations and Chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation (r > 0.800; P < 0.001) between the two methods of administering the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires, and between the VS and GP groups. Likewise, there was a high level of concordance (P > 0.05) between the different dimensions of the WIQ-distance and EQ-5D (self-administration versus face-to-face) in the VS and GP groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the different methods of administering the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires, among the patients with IC. Similarly, the two types of interviewers (VS or GP) were equally valid. Therefore, it seems unnecessary to expend effort to administer these questionnaires by interview, in studies on IC.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Muitas investigações clínicas usam questionários genéricos e/ou específicos para obter informações sobre os participantes e pacientes. Não se sabe se o modo de administração pode afetar os resultados. O objetivo foi determinar se, nos pacientes com claudicação intermitente (CI), existem diferenças nas pontuações do Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) e do European Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) no que diz respeito a: 1) a forma de administrar o questionário (autoadministrado versus entrevista presencial); e 2) o tipo de entrevistador: cirurgião vascular (CV) ou médico generalista (MG). TIPO DE ESTUDIO E LOCAL: Estudo epidemiológico observacional, transversal, multicêntrico realizado no Serviço Nacional de Saúde espanhol. METODO: 1.641 pacientes avaliáveis com CI completaram inicialmente o WIQ e questionários EQ-5, e depois, no mesmo dia, foram entrevistados pelo seu médico. Foram utilizados correlações de Pearson e testes de qui-quadrado. RESULTADOS: Houve forte correlação (r > 0,800; P < 0,001) entre os dois métodos de administração do WIQ e EQ-5D; e entre os grupos CV e MG. Também houve alto nível de concordância (P > 0,05) entre as diferentes dimensões do WIQ-distância e EQ-5D (autoadministrado versus entrevista presencial), nos grupos CV e MG. Conclusão: Em pacientes com CI, não há diferenças entre as diferentes formas de administrar os questionários WIQ e EQ-5D. Da mesma forma, os dois tipos de entrevistador (CV ou MG) foram igualmente válidos. Portanto, não parece necessário despender esforço para administrar esses questionários através de entrevista, em estudos de CI.

Self-administered versus interview-based questionnaires among patients with intermittent claudication: Do they give different results? A cross-sectional study.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Many clinical investigations use generic and/or specific questionnaires to obtain information about participants and patients. There is disagreement about whether the administration method can affect the results. The aim here was to determine whether, among patients with intermittent claudication (IC), there are differences in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) scores with regard to: 1) the questionnaire administration method (self-administration versus face-to-face interview); and 2) the type of interviewer (vascular surgeon, VS, versus general practitioner, GP). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional observational multicenter epidemiological study carried out within the Spanish National Health Service. METHODS: 1,641 evaluable patients with IC firstly completed the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires and then were interviewed by their doctor on the same day. Pearson correlations and Chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation (r > 0.800; P < 0.001) between the two methods of administering the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires, and between the VS and GP groups. Likewise, there was a high level of concordance (P > 0.05) between the different dimensions of the WIQ-distance and EQ-5D (self-administration versus face-to-face) in the VS and GP groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the different methods of administering the WIQ and EQ-5D questionnaires, among the patients with IC. Similarly, the two types of interviewers (VS or GP) were equally valid. Therefore, it seems unnecessary to expend effort to administer these questionnaires by interview, in studies on IC.

Control de la anticoagulación con warfarina o acenocumarol en España. ¿Hay diferencias? / Control of anticoagulation with warfarin or acenocoumarol in Spain. Do they Differ?

No disponible

Control de la anticoagulación en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular asistidos en atención primaria en España. Estudio PAULA / Anticoagulation control in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation attended at primary care centers in Spain: the PAULA study

Introducción y objetivos: Conocer la situación actual del control de la anticoagulación en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular tratados con antagonistas de la vitamina K en atención primaria en España. Métodos: PAULA es un estudio observacional transversal/retrospectivo y multicéntrico de ámbito nacional. Se incluyó a pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular en tratamiento con antagonistas de la vitamina K durante el último año atendidos en las consultas de atención primaria. Se registraron los valores de la razón internacional nomalizada (INR) durante los últimos 12 meses. El grado de control de la anticoagulación se determinó mediante el tiempo en rango terapéutico, tanto por el método directo (mal control < 60%) como por el método de Rosendaal (mal control < 65%).Resultados: Se evaluó a 1.524 pacientes (media de edad, 77,4 ± 8,7 años; el 48,6% mujeres; el 64,2% en fibrilación auricular permanente; media de CHADS2, 2,3 ± 1,2; de CHA2DS2-VASc, 3,9 ± 1,5, y de HAS-BLED, 1,6 ± 0,9). El número medio de determinaciones de la INR registradas por paciente fue 14,4±3,8. El 56,9% de los pacientes tenían un adecuado control por la INR según el método directo y el 60,6% según el método de Rosendaal. En el análisis multivariable, fueron predictores de mal control de la INR el sexo femenino, los hábitos dietéticos que pudieran afectar a la anticoagulación con antagonistas de la vitamina K, la polimedicación y los antecedentes de INR lábil. Conclusiones: Aproximadamente el 40% de los pacientes (el 43,1% por el método directo y el 39,4% por el método de Rosendaal) con fibrilación auricular no valvular anticoagulados con antagonistas de la vitamina K en atención primaria en España presentan un control de la anticoagulación inadecuado durante los 12 meses previos (AU)

Introduction and objectives: To determine the current status of anticoagulation control in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with vitamin K antagonists in the primary care setting in Spain. Methods: The PAULA study was a multicenter cross-sectional/retrospective observational study conducted throughout Spain. The study included patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who had been receiving vitamin K antagonist therapy during the past year and were attended at primary care centers. International normalized ratio (INR) values over the past 12 months were recorded. The degree of anticoagulation control was defined as the time the patient had remained within the therapeutic range and was determined by both the direct method (poor control < 60%) and by the Rosendaal method (poor control < 65%). Results: The study assessed 1524 patients (mean age, 77.4 8.7 years; 48.6% women; 64.2% in permanent atrial fibrillation; CHADS2 mean, 2.3 1.2; CHA2DS2-VASc, 3.9 1.5, and HAS-BLED, 1.6 0.9). The mean number of INR readings recorded per patient was 14.4 3.8. A total of 56.9% of patients had adequate INR control according to the direct method and 60.6% according to the Rosendaal method. The multivariate analysis identified the following predictors for poor INR control: female sex, dietary habits potentially affecting anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists, multidrug therapy, and a history of labile INR. Conclusions: Approximately 40% of patients (43.1% by the direct method and 39.4% by the Rosendaal method) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were receiving anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists in primary care in Spain had poor anticoagulation control during the previous 12 months (AU)