Fetal head size and effect of manual perineal protection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a previously identified modification of Viennese method of perineal protection remains most effective for reduction of perineal tension in cases with substantially smaller or larger fetal heads. METHODS: A previously designed finite element model was used to compare perineal tension of different modifications of the Viennese method of perineal protection to "hands-off" technique for three different sizes of the fetal head. Quantity and extent of tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery at the time when the suboccipito-bregmatic circumference passes between the fourchette and the lower margin of the pubis was determined. RESULTS: The order of effectiveness of different modifications of manual perineal protection was similar for all three sizes of fetal head. The reduction of perineal tension was most significant in delivery simulations with larger heads. The final position of fingers 2cm anteriorly from the fourchette (y = +2) consistently remains most effective in reducing the tension. The extent of finger movement along the anterior-posterior (y-axis) contributes to the effectiveness of manual perineal protection. CONCLUSION: Appropriately performed Viennese manual perineal protection seems to reduce the perineal tension regardless of the fetal head size, and thus the method seems to be applicable to reduce risk of perineal trauma for all parturients.

The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Comparison of the modifications of the Viennese method of manual perineal protection (VMPP) and hands-off delivery techniques by applying basic principles of mechanics with assessments of tensions within perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. Evaluation of the role of the precise placements of the accoucheur's posterior (dominant) thumb and index finger in perineal tissue tension when performing a modified Viennese method of MPP. METHODS: We carried out an experimental study on a biomechanical model of the perineum at NTIS (New Technologies for Information Society, Pilsen, Czech Republic). Hands-off and 38 variations of VMPP were simulated during vaginal delivery with the finite element model imitating a clinical lithotomy position. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were quantity and extent of strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Stress distribution between modifications of VMPP showed a wide variation in peak perineal tension from 72 to 102 % compared with 100 % for the "hands-off" technique. Extent of reduction depended on the extent of finger movement across a horizontal, transverse x-axis, and on final finger position on a vertical, antero-posterior y-axis. The most effective modification of VMPP was initial position of fingers 12 cm apart (x = ±6) on the x-axis, 2 cm anteriorly from the posterior fourchette (y = +2) on the y-axis with 1cm movement of both finger and thumb toward the midline on the x-axis (Δx = 1) with no movement on the y-axis (Δy = 0). CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with simulation of vaginal delivery, exact placement of fingertips on the perineal skin, together with their co-ordinated movement, plays an important role in the extent of reduction of perineal tension.

Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared hands-on manual perineal protection (MPP) and hands-off delivery techniques using the basic principles of mechanics and assessed the tension of perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. We also measured the effect of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominant-posterior hand on perineal tissue tension when a modified Viennese method of MPP is performed. METHODS: Hands-off and two variations of hands-on manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery were simulated using a biomechanical model, with the main outcome measure being strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Stress distribution with the hands-on model shows that when using MPP, the value of highest stress was decreased by 39 % (model B) and by 30 % (model C) compared with the hands-off model A. On the cross section there is a significant decrease in areas of equal tension throughout the perineal body in both hands-on models. Simulation of the modified Viennese MPP significantly reduces the maximum tension on the inner surface of the perineum measured at intervals of 2 mm from the posterior fourchette. CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with a finite element model of vaginal delivery, appropriate application of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominant-posterior hand to the surface of the perineum during the second stage of delivery significantly reduces tissue tension throughout the entire thickness of the perineum; thus, this intervention might help reduce obstetric perineal trauma.

Stereophotogrammetry of the perineum during vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze deformation of the perineum during normal vaginal delivery in order to identify clinical steps that might be beneficial when executing manual perineal protection. METHODS: The present prospective study at Charles University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic, enrolled 10 primiparous women at term undergoing non-instrumental vaginal delivery assisted by the same obstetrician between September 2009 and September 2010. A modified hands-poised technique performed concurrently with stereophotogrammetry was used to analyze and quantify perineal deformation and strain at the final stage of delivery. RESULTS: The highest tissue strain (mean, 177%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 106.3-248.5) was in a transverse direction and occurred at the level of the fourchette (i.e. 1cm was transversely stretched and deformed to 2.77 cm during the final stage of vaginal delivery). This strain was more than 4 times higher than the maximum anteroposterior strain (mean, 43%; 95% CI, 28.6-57.4). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these stereophotogrammetry data, a technique of perineal protection executed by fingers of the posterior (right) hand can be proposed. Further experimental and clinical studies are needed to evaluate whether this technique might assist in reducing obstetric perineal trauma.

The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relevance of the suture angle when evaluating mediolateral episiotomy, and the safety of the accepted lower limit of 40 degrees for the incision angle. METHOD: The angles formed by the incision and suture lines with the midline were measured, and any perineal tear noted, in 50 consecutive women undergoing their first vaginal delivery. RESULTS: The angles were significantly different (40 degrees and 22.5 degrees , respectively; P<0.001). The only variable significantly linked to the difference was the timing of the episiotomy. CONCLUSION: The suture angle cannot currently be used to assess the adequacy of the incision angle; moreover, an incision angle of 40 degrees is probably too acute to prevent potential sphincter damage.