Pregnancy and post-partum outcomes of obese women after bariatric surgery: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery (BS) is known to reduce several obesity-related complications during pregnancy, but there is concern that it may increase the risk of maternal-fetal morbidity because of the malabsorption. This study aimed to investigate the impact of restrictive BS on several pregnancy outcomes in comparison with different grades of obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective case-control study. All primiparous singleton pregnant women who underwent BS between the previous 1-5 years or with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 delivering in our center were included. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall, 90 women were included: 30 underwent BS and 60 were obese. The mean pre-pregnancy BMI was 31.0 ± 4.2 kg/m2 in the BS group and 38.1 ± 4.3 kg/m2 in the control group (p < 0.001). The obese group experienced higher rate of fetal macrosomia (25% vs 6.7%; p = 0.049), gestational hypertension (23.3% vs 3.3%; p = 0.04), preeclampsia (23.3% vs 0%; p = 0.04), gestational diabetes (33.3% vs 6.7%; p = 0.01), and cesarean section (68.3% vs 20%; p < 0.0001). The BS group showed higher frequency of small for gestational age (SGA) (46.7% vs 18.3%; p = 0.006), late preterm delivery (PTD) (33.3% vs 10%; p = 0.009), cholestasis (13.3% vs 1.7%; p = 0.049). Breastfeeding ≥ 6 months was higher among BS mothers (36.7% vs 11.7%; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the positive impact of BS on several obstetric outcomes, at the expense of a higher frequency of SGA and PTD. BS mothers more frequently achieved the recommended goal of breastfeeding for 6 months compared to obese women.

Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in pregnancy with diagnosis of chorionic bump on first-trimester sonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between the presence of the sonographic finding of chorionic bump (CB) during first trimester and miscarriage rate or other perinatal outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Clinicaltrials.gov databases, from inception to April 8, 2021 were explored utilizing combinations of the relevant medical subject heading (MeSH) terms, key words, and word variants for "CB" and "pregnancy." Prospective and retrospective case-control studies were eligible for inclusion. Odds ratios (ORs) comparing obstetrical outcomes among pregnancies with CB and normal pregnancies were determined with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Primary outcome of interest was miscarriage rate. Secondary outcomes were: alive newborns (ANB) rate, adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) and vaginal bleeding. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Five studies including 173 pregnant women with CB (study group) and 1,263 pregnant women without CB (control group) were included. Pregnancies affected by CB resulted to be associated with a significantly higher miscarriage rate (43.3% vs 20.7%; OR 2.95 95% CI 2.02-4.31, p < .00001), and conversely with a significantly lower rate of ANB (60.3% vs 82%; OR 0.35 95% CI 0.20-0.63, p = .0004). In addition, the risk of APO was around three-fold higher in the study group (52.2% vs 4.12%; OR 2.98 95% CI 1.04-8.51, p = .04), while the rate of vaginal bleeding was higher in the study group, without reaching a statistical significance (48% vs 16.4%; OR 2.21 95% CI 0.64-7.65 p = .21). DISCUSSION: The presence of CB at first trimester ultrasound significantly increases the risk of miscarriage and APO, and intact the rate of ANB. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Key message: The presence of CB on early first trimester ultrasound increases three-fold the risk of miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcomes and reduces the rate of alive newborns. It is important to consider CB as an ultrasound marker that requires a close surveillance throughout pregnancy to prevent long-term complications and provide adequate counseling to the patient.

Behcet's disease and pregnancy: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Behcet's disease (BD) is a rare inflammatory, multisystemic, autoimmune disorder with unknown origin. BD is included in vasculitic disorders with a more frequent onset characterized by oral and genital ulcers associated with eye inflammation. However, BD has several clinical manifestations, and the most fearful complication is thrombotic involvement. BD occurs mainly in women of childbearing age, therefore it is important to identify the potential risks of pregnancy on the mother and fetus. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The aim of our review is to identify, through the study of existing literature, the possible consequences of pregnancy on the course of this disease, the potential risks for the mother and fetus in gestation period and in puerperium, in order to identify a correct pregnancy management in patient affected by BD. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Currently, there are few studies that have analyzed the consequences of the disease on the course of pregnancy and pregnancy on the activity of the pathology. Some authors believe that pregnancy may worsen the symptoms of the disease, while others may even improve the course. Many authors believe that thromboembolic events are the main problems for which focus attention on these patients, both in pregnancy and in puerperium. Different opinions exist about pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes, although events such as abortion, intrauterine growth restriction and C-section appear to have a higher incidence in BD patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are no contraindications for the onset of pregnancy in BD patients. In most cases pregnancy can improve the course of the disease. However, in view of the potential adverse events, a thorough follow-up of the pregnancy is necessary in order to minimize any risks to the mother and fetus.