Prognostic value of health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a random forest methodology.

PURPOSE: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) is currently an important parameter in the choice of treatment strategy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPA) patients. However, previous research has shown that patients' self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scales provided additional prognostic information in homogeneous groups of patients with respect to ECOG-PS. The aim of this study was to identify HRQOL scales with independent prognostic value in mPA and to propose prognostic groups for these patients. METHODS: We analysed data from 98 chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven mPA recruited from 2007 to 2011 in the FIRGEM phase II study which aimed to compare the effectiveness of two chemotherapy regimen. HRQOL data were assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. A random survival forest methodology was used to impute missing data and to identify major prognostic factors for overall survival. RESULTS: Baseline HRQOL assessment was completed by 60 % of patients (59/98). Twelve prognostic variables were identified. The three most important prognostic variables were fatigue, appetite loss, and role functioning, followed by three laboratory variables. The model's discriminative power assessed by Harrell's C statistic was 0.65. Fatigue score explained almost all the survival variability. CONCLUSION: HRQOL scores have prognostic value for mPA patients with good ECOG-PS. Moreover, the patient's fatigue, appetite loss, and self-perception of daily activities were more reliable prognostic indicators than clinical and laboratory variables. These HRQOL scores, especially the fatigue symptom, should be urgently included for prognostic assessment of mPA patients (with good ECOG-PS).

Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine alone or alternating with FOLFIRI.3 (irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil) in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an AGEO randomised phase II study (FIRGEM).

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil and irinotecan-based, and gemcitabine-based regimens, are the standard of care in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. New approaches are needed to improve survival and quality of life. Whether a sequential approach alternating irinotecan, fluorouracil and gemcitabine may be effective and tolerable in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is unknown. METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status 0-1, and bilirubin levels <1.5 upper limit of normal values (ULN) were randomised 1:1 to receive as first-line treatment either FOLFIRI.3 (irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil) alternating with fixed-dose rate gemcitabine as 2-month periods (FIRGEM, arm A), or fixed-dose rate gemcitabine alone (arm B). Treatment was continued until disease progression or limiting toxicity. The primary end-point was the crude progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. The study is registered with EudraCT (N° 2006-005703-34). RESULTS: Between October 2007 and March 2011, 98 patients were enroled. The observed 6-month PFS rate was 43.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), [28.6-58.4%]) in arm A reaching the Fleming decision rules criteria to reject H0 and 26.1% (95% CI [12.9-39.3%]) in arm B. Objective response rates were 37% (23-51%) in arm A and 10% (1-19%) in arm B. Median PFS (5.0 versus 3.4 months, hazard ratio (HR)=0.59 [0.38-0.90]) and overall survival (11.0 versus 8.2 months, HR=0.71 [0.46-1.10]) were higher in arm A compared to arm B. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (49%/24%; febrile neutropenia, 4%/0% in arms A/B), diarrhoea (arm A, 12% and arm B, 0%), and nausea/vomiting (8%/4%). No toxic deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The FIRGEM strategy appears to be effective and feasible in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

A Reappraisal of Chemotherapy-Induced Liver Injury in Colorectal Liver Metastases before the Era of Antiangiogenics.

Background and Aims. Chemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases can induce hepatotoxicity in noncancerous liver. We describe these lesions and assess risk factors and impacts on postresection morbidity and mortality in naive patients to chemotherapy before the era of bevacizumab. Methods. Noncancerous liver tissue lesions were analysed according to tumour, chemotherapy, surgery, and patient characteristics. Results. Fifty patients aged 62 ± 9.3 years were included between 2003 and 2007. Thirty-three (66%) received chemotherapy, with Folfox (58%), Folfiri (21%), LV5FU2 (12%), or Xelox (9%) regimens. Hepatotoxicity consisted of 18 (36%) cases of severe sinusoidal dilatation (SD), 13 (26%) portal fibrosis, 7 (14%) perisinusoidal fibrosis (PSF), 6 (12%) nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), 2 (4%) steatosis >30%, zero steatohepatitis, and 16 (32%) surgical hepatitis. PSF was more frequent after chemotherapy (21% versus 0%, P = 0.04), especially LV5FU2 (P = 0.02). SD was associated with oxaliplatin (54.5% versus 23.5%, P = 0.05) and low body mass index (P = 0.003). NRH was associated with oxaliplatin (P = 0.03) and extensive resection (P = 0.04). No impact on mortality and morbidity was observed, apart postoperative elevation of bilirubin levels in case of PSF (P = 0.03), longer hospitalization in case of surgical hepatitis (P = 0.03), and greater blood loss in case of portal fibrosis (P = 0.03). Conclusions. Chemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases induces sinusoidal dilatation related to oxaliplatin and perisinusoidal fibrosis related to 5FU, without any impact on postoperative mortality.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy screening in advanced hepatocarcinoma: A multi-center French study.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been reported for receptor (SSTR) screening in advanced hepatocarcinoma (aHC) prior to somatostatin analogue treatment. AIMS: To evaluate SSTR screening with SRS in aHC patients. RESULTS: Seventy aHC patients (63 men) aged 65 +/- 11 y were included, with alcohol, viral or other causes cirrhosis in 35 (50%), 23 (33%), 12 (17%) cases respectively. CLIP score was 2.7 +/- 1.7, with more than three nodules in 37 (53%) cases. Largest nodule measured 7.6 +/- 4.5 cm. Median alpha-fetoprotein was 574 UI/mL. SRS was positive in 25/70 (35.7%) livers and 7/17 (41.2%) metastatic sites. Positive SRS patients differed from others for tumor size (9.2 +/- 4 vs. 6.7 +/- 4.6 cm, p = 0.03), prothrombin time (PT) (75.2 +/- 15.2 vs. 61.9 +/- 19%, p = 0.005), albumin (34.1 +/- 5.9 vs. 30.5 +/- 7.2 g/L, p = 0.04) and Child-Pugh (6.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 7.7 +/- 2.3, p = 0.04). After multivariate analysis, only PT was associated with positive SRS (p = 0.028). Immunohistochemistry was positive for SSTR2s in 6/7 tumors (SRS uptake in 5/6 cases). METHODS: SRS was performed prior treatment, with images at 4, 24 and 48 h. For seven tumors, SSTR2 subtype was detected immunohistochemically. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced hepatocarcinoma, we report SRS uptake in 35.7% of livers and 41.2% of metastatic sites. SRS value in screening patients for somatostatin analogue treatment remains to be assessed.

[Premalignant gastric lesions (except lymphomas)]. / Etats et lésions précancéreux de l'estomac (en dehors des lymphomes).

Atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, autoimmune corpus atrophic gastritis, gastric remnant man 15 years after gastrectomy, hyperplastic or adenoma polyps and gastric ulcer are conditions associated with an increased risk of gastric carcinoma of intestinal or diffuse type. The role of Helicobacter pylori infection is major but the usefulness of H. pylorieradication to revert precancerous lesions is questionable. Except for patients with dysplasia, no consensus exists for endoscopic surveillance of these premalignant conditions in countries with low incidence of gastric cancer.