[Role of nitric oxide in the SOS response in Escherichia coli]. / Rol' oksida azota v formirovanii SOS-indutsiruiushchego signala u Escherichia coli.

Having one electron with unpaired spin, nitric oxide (NO) shows high reactivity and activates or inhibits free radical chain reactions. NO toxic and genotoxic effects appear to be the result of intracellular formation of peroxinitrite that can induce some cellular damages, including DNA strand breaks, DNA base oxidation, destruction of the key enzymes, etc. Taking into account the character of DNA damages being formed under NO activity, we proposed a formation of the SOS signal and induction the SOS DNA repair response in E. coli cells treated with NO physiological donors--DNIC and GSNO. The ability of NO donor compounds to induce the SOS DNA response in E. coli PQ37 with sfiA::lacZ operon fusion is reported here at the first time. So, the SOS DNA repair response induction is one of the function of nitric oxide.

Activation of the Escherichia coli SoxRS-regulon by nitric oxide and its physiological donors.

Activation of the Escherichia coli SoxRS-regulon by nitric oxide (NO) and its physiological donors (S-nitrosothiol (GS-NO) and dinitrosyl iron complexes with glutathione (DNIC(glu)) and cysteine (DNIC(cys)) ligands) has been studied. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of signal transduction via nitrosylation of Fe-S-centers in SoxR, the ability of pure NO and NO-producing agents to activate the SoxRS-regulon in E. coli cells bearing a soxS::lacZ operon (promoter) fusion has been compared. EPR spectroscopy of whole cells has been used to monitor the formation of inducible protein-DNIC complexes. DNIC(cys), GS-NO, and pure NO appeared to be potent inducers of soxS expression, whereas DNIC(glu) was considerably less efficient. Thus, lower in vitro stability of DNIC(cys) was in contrast with its higher biological activity. Pretreatment of the cells with o-phenanthroline, a chelating agent for iron, prevented soxS expression by GS-NO. Treatment of intact E. coli cells with DNIC, GS-NO, and NO at equimolar concentration 150 microM resulted in formation of a single EPR-detectable DNIC-type signal with g = 2.03. The initial stage in the SoxR transcription activity is supposed to include two steps: first, DNIC primers are formed from exogenous NO and free iron, and then these DNIC disintegrate SoxR [2Fe-2S] clusters and thus activate SoxRS-regulon transcription.

A role of iron ions in the SOS DNA repair response induced by nitric oxide in Escherichia coli.

An induction of the SOS DNA repair response by physiological nitric oxide donors (dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNIC) with thiols and S-nitrosothiols (RSNO)) was studied in E. coli cells. DNIC with thiols were the most effective SOS-inducers. Being more toxic, RSNO mediated a similar response at 10-100 microM, but they were inactive at concentrations above 0.5 mM. Pretreatment of the cells with chelating agents, o-phenanthroline and picolinic acid, prevented induction of the SOS response by all NO-donors used and led to a decrease in the DNIC-type EPR signal that appeared after incubation of the cells with DNIC or S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO). Analysis of these effects revealed a dual role of iron ions in reactivity and toxicity of the NO-donating agents. On one hand, they could stabilize GSNO in the form of less toxic DNIC, and, on the other hand, they took part in the formation of the SOS-inducing signal by NO-donating agents.

Induction of the SOS DNA repair response in Escherichia coli by nitric oxide donating agents: dinitrosyl iron complexes with thiol-containing ligands and S-nitrosothiols.

The ability of nitric oxide (NO) donor compounds to induce the SOS DNA repair response in Escherichia coli is reported. Dinitrosyl iron complexes with glutathione and cysteine (DNIC) are the most potent SOS-inducers. S-Nitrosothiols (RSNO) mediate a similar response at 10-100 microM, but the response decreases sharply at concentrations above 0.5 mM. Pretreatment of the cells with the chelating agent o-phenanthroline (OP) prevents induction of the SOS response by all agents used. On the other hand, the toxicity of S-nitrosothiols is higher than that of DNIC. The EPR study shows the appearance of an EPR DNIC-type signal after incubation of the cells with S-nitrosoglutathione because of mutual transformation between RSNO and DNIC in the presence of accessible iron inside the cells. Pretreatment of the cells with OP leads to a decrease in this signal. Analysis of NO donor effects reveals a dual role of the iron ions in reactivity and toxicity of the compounds studied, i.e. (i) stabilization of the cytotoxic RSNO and (ii) generation of the SOS signal.

Interaction of peroxynitrite and hydrogen peroxide with dinitrosyl iron complexes containing thiol ligands in vitro.

The interaction of peroxynitrite with thiolate dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNIC) has been examined and compared with the interaction with H2O2. Peroxynitrite oxidized DNIC containing various thiolate ligands--cysteine, glutathione, and bovine serum albumin. Analysis of the oxidation suggested a two-electron reaction and gave third-order rate constants of (9.3 +/- 0.5).109 M-2.sec-1 for DNIC with BSA, (4.0 +/- 0.3).108 M-2.sec-1 for DNIC with cysteine, and (1. 8 +/- 0.3).107 M-2.sec-1 for DNIC with glutathione at 20 degrees C and pH 7.6. Peroxynitrite was more reactive towards DNIC than towards sulfhydryls. Addition of sodium dithionite after the reaction led to significant restoration of the EPR signal of DNIC with cysteine. The reaction of glutathione DNIC with H2O2 was about 600 times slower than with ONOO- and not reversed by sodium dithionite. Thus peroxynitrite, in contrast to hydrogen peroxide, changes the pool of nitrosocompounds which can be responsible for interconversion, storage, and transportation of nitric oxide in vivo.