Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 80(2): 176-84, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23877307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pediatric craniosynostosis repair (CR) involves wide scalp dissections with multiple osteotomies and has been associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to document the impact of perioperative complications on prolonged mechanical ventilation after CR. METHODS: Data were collected from the anesthesia records, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) progress notes and discharge summaries. All the patients were transferred from the operating room sedated and on mechanical ventilation to the PICU. To highlight the determinants of prolonged mechanical ventilation we performed a logistic regression analysis.. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent CR, but 6 were excluded due to incomplete records. The main intraoperative complications were: metabolic acidosis (32%), hypotension (20%), dural tears laceration (22%) and altered coagulation (18%). Metabolic acidosis (46%) and relative polycythemia (24%) were detected on arrival to the PICU. All children received intraoperative blood products and 23 (46%) were transfused in the postoperative period too. No infective complications were detected. The only determinant associated significantly with a prolonged mechanical ventilation was to have surgery in the first 5 years of the program (P=0.05) (95% CI 0.358-0.996). CONCLUSION: All life-threatening complications were intraoperative whereas only milder ones, such as hypercloremic and lactic acidosis were noticed in PICU. All children are alive without any neurological deficit. Even though we deal on a daily basis with complex surgical cases, only time, hence experience, showed an impact on prolonged mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Respiration, Artificial , Anesthesia , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Postoperative Care , Retrospective Studies
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 100(5): 701-6, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18344552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ketamine is used increasingly in paediatric anaesthetic practice to prolong the action of a caudal block. This study was designed to determine if adding S(+)-ketamine 0.5 mg kg(-1) allows a lower concentration of levobupivacaine to be used for caudal anaesthesia without loss of clinical effectiveness. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four children (ASA I or II) aged 3 months-6 yr were randomly allocated to receive 1 ml kg(-1) of levobupivacaine 0.15% with 0.5 mg kg(-1) S(+)-ketamine (Group 1), levobupivacaine 0.175% with 0.5 mg kg(-1) S(+)-ketamine (Group 2), or levobupivacaine 0.2% (Group 3) by the caudal route. Pain, motor block, sedation, and requirement for postoperative analgesia were assessed up to 6 h after operation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in effectiveness at first surgical incision. Significantly lower analgesic requirements were reported in Group 2 compared with Group 3 at wakeup, 180 and 360 min after operation. Time to first rescue analgesia was longer in Group 2 compared with Group 1 or 3. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of analgesia free time demonstrated a significant advantage of Group 2 over Groups 1 and 3 (log rank P=0.05). The incidence of postoperative motor block was not significantly different between the groups. No excess sedation or dysphoric reactions were observed in the ketamine groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 0.5 mg kg(-1) S(+)-ketamine to levobupivacaine 0.175% for caudal analgesia for lower abdominal and urological surgery is significantly more effective in providing postoperative analgesia than levobupivacaine 0.15% with 0.5 mg kg(-1) S(+)-ketamine or levobupivacaine 0.2%.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Caudal/methods , Anesthetics, Combined/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Dissociative , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Ketamine , Abdomen/surgery , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/analogs & derivatives , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Infant , Levobupivacaine , Male , Motor Activity/drug effects , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Urologic Surgical Procedures
3.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 17(3): 255-62, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17263741

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare the effect of propofol and sevoflurane on effectiveness of regional anesthesia. As a secondary objective, we aimed at evaluating the influence of age on neuraxial block profile. METHODS: One hundred and thirteen healthy children aged <10 years, scheduled for general or urological surgical procedures were randomly allocated to receive either propofol or sevoflurane induction and maintenance. Children received caudal or lumbar epidural block depending on their weight and expected surgery. Time to onset of surgical anesthesia, intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, residual motor blockade, postoperative pain, and adverse effects were evaluated. To assess the influence of age on these measures children were further divided into three age groups: 0-24, 25-60 and >60 months. RESULTS: The mean time to onset of surgical anesthesia was significantly shorter in the sevoflurane group than the propofol group (3.1 vs 4.7 min, P < 0.01), independent of the type of regional technique employed. Distress on arousal in recovery was increased in children receiving sevoflurane (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in residual motor blockade between the groups but children between 0 and 24 months receiving sevoflurane had a higher incidence of residual motor blockade 3 h after local anesthetic injection (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that general anesthesia with sevoflurane decreases the time to onset of surgical anesthesia relative to propofol anesthesia. This effect was most marked when sevoflurane anesthesia preceded caudal epidural blockade. The basis for this effect is most likely to be related to differential binding of the two anesthetic agents to receptors in the spinal cord that mediate immobility in response to surgical stimuli.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural , Anesthetics, Local , Bupivacaine , Adolescent , Age Factors , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Anesthesia, General , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Methyl Ethers , Propofol , Prospective Studies , Sevoflurane , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...