The incidence and morphological features of pyramidal lobe on thyroid ultrasound.

The aim of this article is to document the incidence and appearances of the pyramidal lobe of the thyroid gland, and discuss the clinical relevance of this entity in sonographic practice. A prospective study was undertaken over a period of 10 months. A total of 416 consecutive patients attending head and neck ultrasound lists were scanned by a single experienced radiologist or an advanced practitioner sonographer. At the time of reporting, the presence of a pyramidal lobe was recorded. The anatomical morphology was classified into five subgroups devised for the purposes of the study. Appearances were documented in both normal and pathological glands. Of the total number of patients scanned, 90 patients were found to have pyramidal lobes, giving an overall incidence of 21%. In all, 51% were found to originate from the right of the isthmus, 46% from the left and 2% from the midline. One patient had two pyramidal lobes. A significant number of patients having routine neck ultrasounds have an incidental finding of a pyramidal lobe. Ultrasound is an effective modality for the demonstration and classification of the pyramidal lobe, as well as identification of pathology. It is important for radiologists to be aware of this normal variation, as it may be the site of primary or recurrent thyroid pathology. Radiologists should report it where relevant to ensure adequate surgical treatment of pathological glands.

Outcome of fetal talipes following in utero sonographic diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between fetal talipes and other defects, and outcome in relation to postnatal surgery. METHODS: All cases of talipes presenting to the fetal medicine unit between 1993 and 1998 and cases of isolated talipes presenting to the ultrasound department between 1991 and 1998 were examined. The infants were followed-up to determine the number of cases that had structural or positional talipes and the number of cases requiring surgery. RESULTS: There were 76 cases, 59 of which attended the fetal medicine unit and 17 the ultrasound department. Postnatal follow-up details were available in 31 of the 40 live births. There were three neonates with unilateral talipes at birth who were thought to have bilateral talipes on prenatal ultrasound and one neonate had bilateral talipes at birth who had been thought to have unilateral talipes prenatally. In two (6.4%) neonates in whom talipes was not confirmed at birth the abnormality was diagnosed prenatally. Of the 29 neonates with confirmed talipes at birth, the defect was structural in 26 (90%) cases and positional in three. Surgery was necessary in 21 (72%) of the 29 cases and 18 (86%) of those undergoing surgery required only one operation. When live births with associated anomalies were excluded, there were 24 cases with confirmed isolated talipes and 18 (75%) required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides long-term outcome data which can be used to complement current prenatal counseling and shows that in cases of fetal talipes diagnosed prenatally, 90% have a structural rather than a positional deformity. For isolated talipes three quarters of children will require surgery and in the majority of cases only one operation on the foot is necessary. Parents should be made aware of the small possibility of a false-positive diagnosis and discrepancy between the ultrasound and postnatal diagnoses of laterality.

Who should be performing routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective double-blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologist and radiographer.

AIM: To compare the accuracy of radiographers and radiologists in routine abdominal ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients attending for routine abdominal ultrasound were included. Each patient was examined by both a radiographer and radiologist. Both operators noted their findings and wrote a concluding report without conferring. Reports were compared. Where there was disagreement the patient was either re-examined by another radiologist or had further investigation. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 52 were men and 48 were women. The age range was 19-88 years (median 52 years). Thirty-seven patients had renal tract ultrasound, one had an aortic ultrasound and 62 had general upper abdominal ultrasound. In 44 cases both operators reported the examination as normal. In 49 cases both operators reported the examinations as abnormal and there was complete agreement between the operators. In seven cases there was not complete agreement between operators. Three of these disagreements were considered minor and four major. In three of the seven cases the radiographer was correct, and in four the radiologist was correct. CONCLUSION: Experienced radiographers and radiologists are highly accurate in performing and interpreting routine abdominal sonography. Both operators missed a small minority of abnormalities. There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of radiographers and radiologist.