Non-canonical anchor motif peptides bound to MHC class I induce cellular responses.

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on the surface of antigen presenting cells functions to display peptides to the T cell receptor (TCR). Recognition of peptide-MHC by T cells initiates a cascade of signals, which results in the initiation of a T cell dependent immune response. An understanding of how peptides bind to MHC molecules is important for determining the structural basis for T cell dependent immune responses and facilitates the structure-based design of peptides as candidate vaccines to elicit a specific immune response. To date, crystal structures, immunogenicity and in vivo biological relevance have mainly been characterized for high affinity peptide-MHC interactions. From the crystal structures of numerous peptide-MHC complexes it became apparent what canonical sequence features were required for high affinity binding, which led to the ability to predict in most instances peptides with high affinity for MHC. We previously identified the crystal structures of non-canonical peptides in complex with MHC class I (one bound with low affinity and the other with high affinity, but utilizing novel peptide anchors and MHC pockets). It is becoming increasingly evident that other non-canonical peptides can also bind, such as long-, short- and glyco-peptides. However, the in vivo role of non-canonical peptides is not clear and we present here the immunogenicity of two non-canonical peptides and their affinity when bound to MHC class I, H2K(b). Comparison of the three-dimensional structures in complex with MHC suggests major differences in hydrogen bonding patterns with H2K(b), despite sharing similar binding modes, which may account for the differences in affinity and immunogenicity. These studies provide further evidence for the diverse range of peptide ligands that can bind to MHC and be recognized by the TCR, which will facilitate approaches to peptide-based vaccine design.

Mannan-mediated gene delivery for cancer immunotherapy.

Recent years have seen a resurgence in interest in the development of efficient non-viral delivery systems for DNA vaccines and gene therapy. We have previously used oxidized and reduced mannan as carriers for protein delivery to antigen-presenting cells by targeting the receptors that bind mannose, resulting in efficient induction of cellular responses. In the present study, oxidized mannan and reduced mannan were used as receptor-mediated gene transfer ligands for cancer immunotherapy. In vivo studies in C57BL/6 mice showed that injection of DNA encoding ovalbumin (OVA) complexed to oxidized or reduced mannan-poly-L-lysine induced CD8 and CD4 T-cell responses as well as antibody responses leading to protection of mice from OVA+ tumours. Both oxidized and reduced mannan delivery was superior to DNA alone or DNA-poly-L-lysine. These studies demonstrate the potential of oxidized and reduced mannan for efficient receptor-mediated gene delivery in vivo, particularly as DNA vaccines for cancer immunotherapy.

Enhanced major histocompatibility complex class I binding and immune responses through anchor modification of the non-canonical tumour-associated mucin 1-8 peptide.

Designing peptide-based vaccines for therapeutic applications in cancer immunotherapy requires detailed knowledge of the interactions between the antigenic peptide and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in addition to that between the peptide-MHC complex and the T-cell receptor. Past efforts to immunize with high-affinity tumour-associated antigenic peptides have not been very immunogenic, which may be attributed to the lack of T cells to these peptides, having been deleted during thymic development. For this reason, low-to-medium affinity non-canonical peptides represent more suitable candidates. However, in addition to the difficulty in identifying such antigens, peptide binding to MHC, and hence its ability to induce a strong immune response, is limited. Therefore, to enhance binding to MHC and improve immune responses, anchor modifications of non-canonical tumour-associated peptides would be advantageous. In this study, the non-canonical tumour-associated peptide from MUC1, MUC1-8 (SAPDTRPA), was modified at the MHC anchor residues to SAPDFRPL (MUC1-8-5F8L) and showed enhanced binding to H-2Kb and improved immune responses. Furthermore, the crystal structure of MUC1-8-5F8L in complex with H-2Kb was determined and it revealed that binding of the peptide to MHC is similar to that of the canonical peptide OVA8 (SIINFEKL).

Delivery of tumor associated antigens to antigen presenting cells using penetratin induces potent immune responses.

Cytoplasmic delivery of proteins or CTL epitopes is crucial for the presentation of antigen for the generation of CTL. We previously described the use of the 16-amino acid peptide penetratin from the Drosophila Antennapedia domain (Int) to transport CTL epitopes into cells. Here we show that, Int, incorporating MUC1 CTL epitopes in tandem is able to facilitate their rapid uptake by macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) in an energy-dependent endocytic pathway. We also demonstrate for the first time that Int conjugated proteins are also able to be efficiently taken up by DC. Furthermore, C57BL/6 and HLA-A2 transgenic mice immunized with the Int-peptides or Int-proteins induce strong IFN-gamma secreting T cells and weak IgG1 antibodies. Immunized C57BL/6 mice were protected against the growth of a MUC1(+) tumor cell line.

Mannan Mucin-1 Peptide Immunization: Influence of Cyclophosphamide and the Route of Injection.

SUMMARY: The mucin MUC1 is greatly increased in breast cancer and is a potential target for immunotherapy. In mice, MUC1 conjugated to oxidized mannan (MUC1-mannan fusion protein [M-FP]) targets the mannose receptor and induces a high frequency of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and anti-tumor responses. On this basis, three phase I trials were performed in patients with adenocarcinoma to evaluate the tnxicity and the immunologic responses to mannan MUC1. Forty-one patients with metastatic or locally advanced carcinoma of the breast (trial 1), colon (trial 2), and various adenocarcinomas (trial 3) received increasing doses of M-FP (1 to 300 &mgr;g). The immunizations were given at weekly intervals (weeks 1 to 3) and repeated in weeks 7 to 9. Cyclophosphamide (to increase cellular immunity) was given on weeks 1 and 4. M-FP was given intramuscularly in trial 1 and intraperitoneally in trial 2. No toxic effects occurred, and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses were present only as a microscopic lymphocytic infiltration. Overall, approximately 60% of the patients had high-titer MUC1 immunoglobulin G1 antibody responses, with the intraperitoneal route yielding approximately 10-fold higher responses. Cellular responses (proliferation, cytotoxic T cells, or CD8 T cells secreting tumor necrosis factor-alpha alphand interferon-gamma in response to MUC1 stimulation in vitro) were found in 28% of the patients, which was similar to that seen without cyclophosphamide. In most patients, disease progressed, but in five it remained stable. In addition, there were no objective responses. M-FP is not toxic and induces immune responses that were amplified by the intraperitoneal route of immunization. Cyclophosphamide was of no benefit.