Understanding social dynamics and patient experience in out of hospital care: validation of a co-responsibility questionnaire (CoReCare).

Patient experiences are commonly assessed through patient reported experience measures (PREMs). Ambulatory care models extend traditional care into the patients' home, meaning that a triangle of health care professionals, patients, and their families need to be considered when assessing the remote care experience. These intertwined responsibilities are described by co-responsibility. Currently, PREMs don't reflect how elements to remote care impact this remote care experience. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a questionnaire assessing perceived patient-partner co-responsibility as a PREM in remote care. A 30-item questionnaire was assessed among 1000 individuals aged between 18 and 65 years that tried to lose weight with a partner, friend or family member supporting them. Pairwise item correlations, Exploratory Factor Analysis, and Cronbach's alpha were used for validation. 29-items were identified to reflect co-responsibility across 6 factors: empowerment and support, relational aspects, lack of sympathy, co-participation, accepting help and awareness. Cronbach's alpha ranged between 0.66 and 0.93, showing good internal consistency. We present a validated CoReCare Questionnaire to understand the impact of social dynamics on achieving desired health outcomes in a remote care setting. The CoReCare Questionnaire extends current PREMs when aiming to assess and improve the patient experience of a care episode outside of the hospital.

Patient's Preference for Same-Day Discharge or Hospitalization After Bariatric Surgery.

PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery protocols have proven to be effective in reducing complication rates and length of stay. Guidelines do not include a recommendation on the length of hospital stay whereas same-day discharge is currently widely investigated on safety and feasibility. However, none of these studies takes patient preferences into account. The study aimed to reveal the patient's preference for outpatient surgery (OS) in patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center preference-based randomized trial was performed between March and December of 2021. Adult patients planned for primary bariatric surgery were able to choose their care pathway, either OS with remote heart and respiratory rate monitoring by a wearable data logger or standard care with at least one-night hospitalization. RESULTS: Out of the 202 patients, nearly everyone (98.5%) had a preference. Of 199 patients, 99 (49.7%) chose inpatient surgery. Of the 100 with a preference for OS, 23 stayed in the hospital due to medical reasons and 12 patients changed their preference. Based on both initial preference and changed preference, there were no differences between sex, age, body mass index, and co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation, nor in the use of anticoagulants or type of surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients seemed to have a strong preference for their stay after a bariatric procedure. The preference is equally divided between outpatient and inpatient surgery and is not influenced by any patient characteristics.

Additional preparation program for bariatric surgery: Two-year results of a large cohort study.

Background: Multidisciplinary screening of bariatric surgery candidates is recommended, and some centers provide an additional preparation program (APP) to optimize patients preoperatively. Objective: To compare patients with APP to standard care 2 years after primary bariatric surgery regarding postoperative weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for patients undergoing primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy between September 2017 and March 2019. The first 12 months patients received an APP, after September 2018, the APP was no longer part of the weight loss trajectory. A multivariable linear regression model was built. Results: Of the 384 patients receiving an APP advice, 50 were lost to follow up. In total, 192 (57%) received the APP and 142 (43%) received standard care. Percentage total weight loss after 2 years was significantly different, 28.8% for the APP group versus 32% for the standard group (p = 0.001). Postoperative weight loss after 2 years was increased in patients who had a gastric bypass, a higher baseline body mass index, and female gender in multivariable analysis. An APP was predictive for decreased postoperative weight. Diabetes mellitus was in remission significantly more often in the preparation group (84.1% of the cases) compared with the standard group (61.9%, p = 0.028). Conclusion: A weight loss trajectory is at least as effective without additional preparation in terms of 2 years postoperative %TWL for primary gastric bypass and sleeve procedures. For comorbidities, diabetes mellitus was in remission more often in the APP group.

Sleep Quality Before and After Bariatric Surgery.

PURPOSE: Sleep deprivation is associated with growth hormone deficiency and an elevated cortisol level, both of which have been linked to obesity. However, assessing sleep quality is often not established in the multidisciplinary peribariatric evaluation program. This study aimed to determine sleep quality in patients who are seeking or underwent bariatric surgery by using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational study, patients who underwent or were seeking bariatric surgery between April and November 2021 were included. Self-reported patients' demographics, operative techniques, and sleep quality measured by PSQI were collected. Baseline characteristics were compared between the preoperative group (PRE), patients who underwent surgery < 1.5 years ago (EARLY), and > 1.5 years ago (LATE). A multivariate linear regression model was built. RESULTS: In total, 270 patients filled out the questionnaire of which 100 (37.1%) were preoperative, 87 (32.2%) early, and 83 (30.7%) late postoperative. The PSQI significantly improved in the EARLY group compared to PRE (4.8 vs 6.1). This effect disappeared in the LATE group (6.1) even though their body mass index was less. Linear regression revealed that age (p = 0.004) and body mass index (p = 0.003) predicted worse sleep quality. CONCLUSION: Sleep quality improves early after bariatric surgery; however, this benefit does not seem to last in the long term. Other factors than weight regain should be considered for this finding, future studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended, including other variables associated with sleep quality such as health conditions and socioeconomic status.

A broad focus on additional programmes prior to bariatric surgery: A systematic review.

Additional preoperative programmes may be beneficial for candidates who seek bariatric surgery, but there is no consensus on the optimal preparation. This systematic review aimed to summarize the effects of a preoperative programme on weight loss. A literature search was performed for Embase, Cinahl, PubMed and Cochrane Library. Studies on preoperative exercise, behaviour and/or diet programmes administered in adult patients in a bariatric trajectory measuring weight loss were included. Initial results yielded 2148 titles, 70 of which were thoroughly analysed and 37 articles were included, comprising 10 333 patients. Eleven out of 37 studies included postoperative weight loss as an outcome in interventions focused on diet (n = 5), behaviour (n = 2), exercise (n = 2) and a combination of interventions (n = 2). Only one study (9%) which administered exercise as a preoperative programme showed a significant effect on postoperative weight loss. In total, 33 studies included preoperative weight loss as an outcome, which was significant in 64% of the cases. It is difficult to draw conclusions from the investigated data as it was extremely heterogeneous concerning the intensity, duration and administration of a programme. Nevertheless, it seems that a preoperative weight loss programme seems beneficial in terms of preoperative weight loss, postoperative physical activity and improved mental health postinterventional. The use of a core outcome set is recommended for future studies.

Additional preconditioning program for bariatric surgery: Any benefits? A large cohort study.

Postbariatric outcomes may improve by providing an additional preconditioning program (APP) in targeted patients. However, APPs are a demand for health resources while only little and inconsistent evidence consists to support their effectiveness. This cohort study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of APP, by comparing outcomes of patients with and without such APP. We carried out a retrospective single-centre cohort study in a before-after design. Patients signing up for primary gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy and eligible for surgery were included if screened as vulnerable patients. Vulnerable patients screened between September 2017 and March 2018 followed an APP and formed the APP-group. Due to a policy change, APPs were no longer performed since September 2018. Vulnerable patients screened between September 2018 and March 2019 thus did not receive an APP (comparator-group). Multidisciplinary follow-up remained unchanged. Endpoints included percentage total weight loss (%TWL), bodyweight, evolution of comorbidities, protein intake, and number of no-shows. The APP-group comprised 231 patients and the comparator-group 153. %TWL differed statistically significantly at 7 (Δ1.5%, p = .01) and 12 months postoperative (Δ2.8%, p < .01) in favour of the comparator-group, as did bodyweight 12 months postoperative (Δ1.8 kg, p < .01). Statistically significant differences were also found in the evolution of comorbidities, protein intake, and the number of no-shows, most in favour for the comparator-group. APP proofed not to be superior to Non-App. It is debatable whether statically significant differences are clinically relevant given their small magnitude. A care pathway without an APP seems at least as effective as a care pathway without.

Bariatric Tele-screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Holding Back for Direct Approval?

PURPOSE: Many bariatric centers were restricted from providing routine care for outpatients. Telehealth visits allowed the continued care for outpatients and thus the preoperative screening for bariatric candidates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of tele-screening on the multidisciplinary obesity team's decision (MDD) for bariatric surgery: disapproval, direct approval, or a recommendation for a prehabilitation program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital data were collected from patients who underwent face-to-face or tele-screening for bariatric surgery between April and December 2020. The tele-screening cohort was then compared with a propensity-matched cohort of patients with face-to-face consultations. A chi-square and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 396 patients remained for analysis. The majority received preoperative prehabilitation advice in both the tele-screening and face-to-face group (51% versus 50%). Although not significant, there were more direct approvals and fewer denials in the face-to-face group (p = 0.691). The multinomial logistic regression analysis showed no significant impact of tele-screening on the MDD result. CONCLUSION: Tele-screening in bariatric centers is feasible; the multidisciplinary team's decision was not significantly different between tele-screening and face-to-face screening which encourages the use of tele-screening in the future. An insignificant amount of fewer direct approvals and more denials were observed in the tele-screening group, which should be taken into account in future and larger case studies.

Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss on Postoperative Weight Loss Revealed from a Large Nationwide Quality Registry.

PURPOSE: Weight loss before bariatric surgery is not mandatory, but questions remain as to whether preoperative weight loss has an impact on weight loss after surgery. Most studies have small sample sizes. The objective was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative and successful postoperative weight loss defined as ≥25% total weight loss (TWL) at 1 and 2 years after primary bariatric surgery with regard to the obesity-related comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from a large nationwide quality registry of patients who underwent a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or gastric bypass (GBP) between January 2015 and January 2018. Patients with completed screening and preoperative and postoperative data were included. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for each technique and follow-up years separately. RESULTS: In total, 8751 were included in the analysis. Patients with preoperative weight loss were more likely to achieve ≥25% postoperative TWL in both procedures. Patients with higher preoperative weight loss of 5-10% had an increased likelihood for achieving 25% TWL compared to 0-5%, OR 1.79 (CI (1.42-2.25), p < 0.001) vs 1.25 (CI (1.08-1.46), p < 0.004) for the GBP group for year 2 postoperative. This was the same for the SG group at year 2, OR 1.30 (CI (1.03-1.64), p < 0.029) vs 1.14 (CI (0.94-1.38), p < 0.198). CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative weight loss were more likely to achieve ≥25% postoperative TWL at 1 and 2 years after surgery in both procedures; moreover, the extent of preoperative weight loss contributes to the significance and odds of this success.